Kangaroos in Manhattan? Enought to fill a court apparently.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: Threadbarer

You don't see that noone has been convicted in this way ever before? They used a nonexistent crime as evidence to charge another crime.

A coverup of a crime that hasn't even been charged is ridiculous.

To continue with your murder comparison, can you convict a person of lying about not committing a murder if they have not committed that murder and have not even been charged with murder?

Are you saying Cohen lied and Trump really had no idea his money was being used to cover up a scandal prior to his campaign, which is illegal in New York? Because that's the issue. If Cohen lied, prove it. Appellate court exists for a reason.

But if he didn't....

From what I understand, the payment of the 'hush money' was made long before Trump ever considered running for president and without his involvement. I do not understand how it is relivent to his presidential campaign.

The same year he was elected was "long before" he ever considered campaigning for office? 🤔

Ok, I will look into it that part more.

Still, Trump did not know about the payment until the reimbursement and then it was just an invoice from his lawyer. I did a lot of purchasing in my previous job and was responsible for coding the invoices. Leagle expenses sounds reasonable to be because it was a invoice from his lawyer. How else was the expense to be categorized.

Here is leaked video of a real life kangaroo Court !!

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: Threadbarer

You don't see that noone has been convicted in this way ever before? They used a nonexistent crime as evidence to charge another crime.

A coverup of a crime that hasn't even been charged is ridiculous.

To continue with your murder comparison, can you convict a person of lying about not committing a murder if they have not committed that murder and have not even been charged with murder?

Are you saying Cohen lied and Trump really had no idea his money was being used to cover up a scandal prior to his campaign, which is illegal in New York? Because that's the issue. If Cohen lied, prove it. Appellate court exists for a reason.

But if he didn't....

From what I understand, the payment of the 'hush money' was made long before Trump ever considered running for president and without his involvement. I do not understand how it is relivent to his presidential campaign.

These people on the left won't let "No stinking facts" get in their way. What you gonna believe the facts or the "truth" as they see it?

originally posted by: Euronymous2625

originally posted by: Lumenari
Speaking of being in a cult...

Look into a mirror.

If Morgan Freeman runs for president, I'm quitting my job and campaigning.

The truth is that you're going to vote for a felon, and he'll lose.

The truth is he isn't a felon until the appeals are done.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Euronymous2625

originally posted by: Lumenari
Speaking of being in a cult...

Look into a mirror.

If Morgan Freeman runs for president, I'm quitting my job and campaigning.

The truth is that you're going to vote for a felon, and he'll lose.

The truth is he isn't a felon until the appeals are done.

LOL
Tell that to all the felons sitting in federal prisons waiting for their appeals.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Euronymous2625

originally posted by: Lumenari
Speaking of being in a cult...

Look into a mirror.

If Morgan Freeman runs for president, I'm quitting my job and campaigning.

The truth is that you're going to vote for a felon, and he'll lose.

The truth is he isn't a felon until the appeals are done.

LOL
Tell that to all the felons sitting in federal prisons waiting for their appeals.

The NY case isn't Federal 😃

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Euronymous2625

originally posted by: Lumenari
Speaking of being in a cult...

Look into a mirror.

If Morgan Freeman runs for president, I'm quitting my job and campaigning.

The truth is that you're going to vote for a felon, and he'll lose.

The truth is he isn't a felon until the appeals are done.

LOL
Tell that to all the felons sitting in federal prisons waiting for their appeals.

The NY case isn't Federal 😃

Okay. Tell it to all the felons sitting in state prisons, waiting for their appeals.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Euronymous2625

originally posted by: Lumenari
Speaking of being in a cult...

Look into a mirror.

If Morgan Freeman runs for president, I'm quitting my job and campaigning.

The truth is that you're going to vote for a felon, and he'll lose.

The truth is he isn't a felon until the appeals are done.

LOL
Tell that to all the felons sitting in federal prisons waiting for their appeals.

The NY case isn't Federal 😃

Okay. Tell it to all the felons sitting in state prisons, waiting for their appeals.

That's more like it 😊

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: Euronymous2625

originally posted by: Lumenari
Speaking of being in a cult...

Look into a mirror.

If Morgan Freeman runs for president, I'm quitting my job and campaigning.

The truth is that you're going to vote for a felon, and he'll lose.

The truth is he isn't a felon until the appeals are done.

LOL
Tell that to all the felons sitting in federal prisons waiting for their appeals.

The NY case isn't Federal 😃

Okay. Tell it to all the felons sitting in state prisons, waiting for their appeals.

You mean the ones who have had made up charges for a crime not committed? Well, there are none.
/s

So, what are we going to do about it?
My guess is nothing effective.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: Threadbarer

You don't see that noone has been convicted in this way ever before? They used a nonexistent crime as evidence to charge another crime.

A coverup of a crime that hasn't even been charged is ridiculous.

To continue with your murder comparison, can you convict a person of lying about not committing a murder if they have not committed that murder and have not even been charged with murder?

Are you saying Cohen lied and Trump really had no idea his money was being used to cover up a scandal prior to his campaign, which is illegal in New York? Because that's the issue. If Cohen lied, prove it. Appellate court exists for a reason.

But if he didn't....

From what I understand, the payment of the 'hush money' was made long before Trump ever considered running for president and without his involvement. I do not understand how it is relivent to his presidential campaign.

The same year he was elected was "long before" he ever considered campaigning for office? 🤔

The lawyer made the payoff long before the election. Then he billed Trump after he became president. You are half right.

originally posted by: Disgusted123
LOL! I'm sorry but that argument is ridiculous.

Why in the world do you think Trump is taking one for all of you. That if they can go after him, you're next? It's laughable.

Trump doesn't need to come between me and the government. Why? I pay my taxes. I'm not a criminal.

So no. Some of us actually don't get up every day expecting the government to take us away. Didn't we take that a bit far with Obama when he was supposed to declare martial law, take everyone's guns, and put you all in FEMA camps. Oh how soon we forget. NOT ME.

Live your lives people. And realize, it is YOU who is making your life miserable. YOUR PERSPECTIVE IS THE PROBLEM.
Oh and your stubborn willingness to believe EVERY SINGLE PERSON is corrupt EXCEPT Trump! Hahahahahah! What in the world?

a reply to: rdambroso

To be fair, he couldn’t override the second amendment, much as he would like to have, but he did give it a go to get some people to let go of their guns voluntarily for a fee….kind of like how they give free beer and donuts to people if they vote for democrats in the polls.
But every time they try to force people, gun sales just go up.

originally posted by: texas thinker
So, what are we going to do about it?
My guess is nothing effective.

So, any actual suggestions? Or did you just wanna point whiny fingers?

a reply to: tanstaafl

I think I shouldn't suggest what comes to mind, but I will say that it is my opinion we have lost the Republic as it was intended. And winning the right to have it the first time was a long ugly war.
Contrary to the genius talk radio people supposedly on my side (not) we cannot correct course at the ballot box. That course crashed a couple of generations ago.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: rdambroso

Should Presidential candidates be immune from the consequences of their actions? If declare my candidacy and then murder someone is it political persecution if I'm tried and convicted?

No, but there are a few issues. They hold no other political figures to the same standards. They get away with obviously illegal stuff very frequently. Often, for similar things they just convicted Trump of. Often, for much worse things. Banana Republic.

I'm not so sure he was guilty. The jury selection was very suspicious. Can't have anyone who openly likes Trump, but they can have a judge who openly holds disdain for him. Everyone knew how they were ruling before opening statements.

Kangaroo court.

Really the entire country needs to shut up about pronouns and black people being snipered by police and go into the box thinking just one thing. They have a candidate who is happily making every move he can in step with the war mongering globalists and his intentions are to start and participate in Workd War III. And for the first time ever, a World War will be fought which wasn't at all inevitable. And then, the other candidate is going to try and use diplomacy and healthy threats and a strong character to quiet down the nations bickering and under no circumstances will he allow us to participate if World War 3 breaks out. That is the ONLY thing you should be considering this November.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

It's been explained to you multiple times over the course of this trial. It's not my fault you don't understand. I'm done banging my head against the wall.

no, it has not. It's not been explained one #ing time.

You explain it, or at the very least, admit you don't know either. It's a really simple question, what records did he falsify? There was evidence that showed this according to you, what was it?

If you don't know, just say that. Pretending to know makes you look like an idiot.

Funny they can never quite find that supposed post to cite and quote it’s been explained before?

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: rdambroso

Hi. I'm here to attempt a little of this excoriation that you say you are expecting for speaking your mind, ok?

First though, let's take a peek at what Webster's has to say about excoriation. They define it as ''to censure scathingly''.
That makes sense to me as that is the definition I have always attributed to the word though I suppose you must have a different definition in mind. After all you HAVE been here for at least a couple of weeks and for one reason or another come to these forums for a purpose, right? Having seen your posts before I can see that you pretty much are in line with a majority of political positions as well as out right opinions that fill these political forums day in and day out. Right?

I also notice that at the time of this typing, only one member has, it seems, made an attempt to offer a reply that varies with not only your OP but the general course of the thread. So, at least so far, your expectations have been totally incorrect. I wonder why this is.

Could it be that you have missed the general tone of the majority of posters on these forums? I seriously doubt that, no one could be that dumb. So it must be something else. Maybe it is that you share this martyr complex that Trump has been pushing for so long, this idea that he, and all his followers are victims and none of the problems this nation faces are their faults at all. Yeah, that might explain your expectations of censure ship on a Pro Trump website. It fits right in.

That aside though, I agree with you that Trump does have flaws and faults, though I think that we might appreciate the severity of those shortcomings of his to a wildly varying degree. As for the, what did you call it, ''weaponized judicial system'' (isn't that what Trump calls it ?) I think that Boomer addressed that pretty well, it was law enforcing law whether or not criminals like it or not.

So I hope that this hasn't been to ''scathing'' for your persecution complex to handle and who knows, this post may even make it past the, oh, dare I say it, censors?

gee bingo..hardly have a 'martyr complex'. I guess offhandedly you are calling me stupid as well. If YOU think this whole lawfare thing isn't weaponized justice and election interference, then perhaps you should take a fresh set of standardized tests to test the capacity of your brain pan

a reply to: rdambroso

Hi rdam. No, I clearly made it a point that I did not think you are dumb. Dumb would have been to think that a post such as you offered would be excoriated by the Trumpian membership here. Therefore, you might recall, my further reflections on your statements were just that, speculation. Indeed you may not have a martyr complex but that does not mean you do not have a persecution complex, those today are rampant with little affiliation to political persuasion though as everything else that is not excluded from possibilities.

There are though, other motives that might have come in to play in using that word, excoriation. It might be that you just wanted to fit in with the crowd here, to gain stars and flags and be treated as one of the happy gang, again, I don't know. And of course it could be as simple as this, that you had learned a new word and just wanted to see how it feels to your fingers to type it out. I know, I had never typed excoriation on my key board and it was and remains an interesting coordination of digital gymnastics.