Kangaroos in Manhattan? Enought to fill a court apparently.

a reply to: Threadbarer

It wasn't even thin, it was non existant.

The 2 star witnesses, Daniels had signed 2 statements saying the engagement never took place. And had also sent threatening blackmail messages that were not allowed to be presented by the defense.

Cohen, a convicted perjurer, admitted Trump had no knowledge of his actions and admitted he would continue to lie in court for his own gain.

The original alleged charge was an FEC violation, and the judge barred the FEC director from testifying.

The DOJ and FEC had already previously refused to press charges.

Keep in mind Hillary only had to pay an $8,000 fine for hiding that she had paid for the bogus Steele dossier.

The Judge donated to Biden's 2020 campaign, against NY law. The judge specifically earmarked his donation to Biden's campaign for

“resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy”His daughter has made $100 million+ fundraising for democrats using this case.

And the State didn't even disclose what the underlying non-existent crime was until the closing arguments.

You're a clown. Everyone knows it.

a reply to: Boomer1947
yeah ok. I've seen a bunch of democrat criminals running around with ZERO consequences

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Trump was accused of falsifying business records. The prosecution presented enough evidence that convinced a jury that business records were not only falsified at the direction of Trump but that the intent behind it was to cover up other crimes.

Ok, you read Merchan's instructions, right?

You know the part that if they are not unanimous, some vote guilty and others innocent, he would consider that unanimous Guilty?

So back to the murder scenario,

you are innocent of that murder, one jury person votes guilty, the others innocent. If you had this judge, he would consider it a unanimous guilty verdict. Off to the prison for ya.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: rdambroso

Should Presidential candidates be immune from the consequences of their actions? If declare my candidacy and then murder someone is it political persecution if I'm tried and convicted?

explain his actions. I really want to know what he did and what documents he falsified. Every time I ask you this, you scamper off, you likely will this time again. And no, I don't want to see the court papers, I want to hear a leftie who thinks this is all on the up and up explain the crime, and then the fellony that allowed a very old (not crime) to be charged well beyond the statue of limitations.

Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

called that one.

originally posted by: rdambroso
a reply to: Boomer1947
yeah ok. I've seen a bunch of democrat criminals running around with ZERO consequences

Day in, and day out.

This summer is going to sizzle.

a reply to: theatreboy

Those weren't the instructions. If we take my murder example, this is like the jury voting unanimously that the accused was guilty of first degree murder due to being a felony murderer but not unanimous in what crime was being committed when the murder was committed.

a reply to: VariedcodeSole
good..I pray to the Lord above that the criminals running things feel some heat for once

a reply to: network dude

It's been explained to you multiple times over the course of this trial. It's not my fault you don't understand. I'm done banging my head against the wall.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Trump was accused of falsifying business records. The prosecution presented enough evidence that convinced a jury that business records were not only falsified at the direction of Trump but that the intent behind it was to cover up other crimes.

what records did he falisify, and what was his intent? Remember, I don't want to hear what flimsy evidence says, I want to hear from you. Man up sport, pretend you got a pair.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: theatreboy

Those weren't the instructions. If we take my murder example, this is like the jury voting unanimously that the accused was guilty of first degree murder due to being a felony murderer but not unanimous in what crime was being committed when the murder was committed.

Ivy league graduate?

Seems you skipped reading comprehension

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: Threadbarer

The crimes have been layed out time and time again over the past 24hrs. If they agree or not is up to them as they are adults and can make decisions. If they choose to put blinders on for this case then so be it.
I swear it's like the world is ending If you ask some people here.
It will be appealed almost guaranteed IMO. And really this isn't all that bad, Trump just made it bad by violating a judges orders, more than a few times. He wanted the charges on him for political points and to play the vitom card. I mean $34mil is no chump change.

Then explain them to me. I don't get it. If you don't get it also, just say that, but if you pretend to know, but act like a douche, that's not getting it done. Explain what records he falisified. Remember, "I don't know" is an answer.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

It's been explained to you multiple times over the course of this trial. It's not my fault you don't understand. I'm done banging my head against the wall.

no, it has not. It's not been explained one #ing time.

You explain it, or at the very least, admit you don't know either. It's a really simple question, what records did he falsify? There was evidence that showed this according to you, what was it?

If you don't know, just say that. Pretending to know makes you look like an idiot.

LOL! I'm sorry but that argument is ridiculous.

Why in the world do you think Trump is taking one for all of you. That if they can go after him, you're next? It's laughable.

Trump doesn't need to come between me and the government. Why? I pay my taxes. I'm not a criminal.

So no. Some of us actually don't get up every day expecting the government to take us away. Didn't we take that a bit far with Obama when he was supposed to declare martial law, take everyone's guns, and put you all in FEMA camps. Oh how soon we forget. NOT ME.

Live your lives people. And realize, it is YOU who is making your life miserable. YOUR PERSPECTIVE IS THE PROBLEM.
Oh and your stubborn willingness to believe EVERY SINGLE PERSON is corrupt EXCEPT Trump! Hahahahahah! What in the world?

a reply to: rdambroso

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: Threadbarer

The crimes have been layed out time and time again over the past 24hrs. If they agree or not is up to them as they are adults and can make decisions. If they choose to put blinders on for this case then so be it.
I swear it's like the world is ending If you ask some people here.
It will be appealed almost guaranteed IMO. And really this isn't all that bad, Trump just made it bad by violating a judges orders, more than a few times. He wanted the charges on him for political points and to play the vitom card. I mean $34mil is no chump change.

Then explain them to me. I don't get it. If you don't get it also, just say that, but if you pretend to know, but act like a douche, that's not getting it done. Explain what records he falisified. Remember, "I don't know" is an answer.

I don't see the victim in the crime so there is that. But the State of NY does, so I guess "I don't know".

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3

Trump was accused of falsifying business records. The prosecution presented enough evidence that convinced a jury that business records were not only falsified at the direction of Trump but that the intent behind it was to cover up other crimes.

what records did he falisify, and what was his intent? Remember, I don't want to hear what flimsy evidence says, I want to hear from you. Man up sport, pretend you got a pair.

"Intent" being the magic word.
How many times has the left used "intent" (or lack thereof) to let one of their own off the hook?

originally posted by: Boomer1947
a reply to: rdambroso

Election interference is conventionally defined as an illegal attempt to influence the outcome of an election--with the emphasis on "illegal". That would include things like putting forth slates of fake electors, asking the Secretary of State of a swing state to "find" thousands of votes that don't exist, or whipping up a crowd to stop a Joint session of Congress convened to certify the election. In the State of New York, it also includes attempting to influence the outcome of an election by the illegal means of falsifying official records, as we have just been seen.

That's not what happened here. Bringing a criminal suspect to trial is not illegal, even if that suspect is a candidate for President. Quite the opposite, actually. Bringing a Presidential candidate to trial might very well affect the OUTCOME of an election, especially if that candidate is found guilty. In fact I hope it would--but AFFECTING the outcome of an election by legal means is not the same as INTERFERING with an election by illegal means.

Or getting former intelligence chiefs to sign a statement that a laptop they never saw first hand was Russian disinformation. Or taking hammers to supeonaed hard drives from a government post. Stop acting as if different standards miraculously start applying once the person of interest has an R next to their name. That is what more and more people are starting to see. Selective application of the law aka lawfare.

Never mind. WatchItBurn beat me to it.

a reply to: Disgusted123

yeah just keep on being the frog in the pot as your liberties, possessions and freedoms dwindle.
Great plan. I'm astounded you don't find this situation an extreme overstep by our government and the judicial system.
Kick back and have a pizza and laugh it all off. Hopefully it won't be under a bridge in a tent in the not too distant future.

a reply to: rdambroso

Well , what Else is there to say about All this >? It's NYC , Nuff said....