It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: burritocat
I can only see him using a tactical nuke if backed into a corner. Would that mean WW3? I don't know.
Would Xi let him? Doubt it.
It's all rhetoric and sabre rattling.
As for a first strike, against the West, what would be the point?
It would be suicide. China would lose it's huge export market and in Russia, China is the Boss.
Putin is Xi's lapdog. He just keeps yapping. He needs muzzling.
I think it is time to end the human race.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Scratchpost
Another cheerleader for WW3?
Altogether, I think it would be best avoided.
You want OTHER people to go fight and die, not your "precious self"....
Continuing the fight at this point is just genocide of the remianing Ukrainians
The latest version of the R-36 intercontinental ballistic missile (called SS-18 by NATO) could hit anywhere in the U.S. with at least 10 18-25 megaton nuclear warheads.
originally posted by: Yubyub
I thought we were all meant to be wiped out last week in a nuclear strike?
Are Russiab threats empty or something
This has not happened, the same goes for Crimea.In fact most of the inhabitants , are glad to get out of the Dystopian #hole which the Ukraine has become, along with a high proportion of the population leaving and prefering to be any where else but there.
A very high amount of the Western public will not be going to war with Russia.I suggest that if it happens there will be so much turmoil it would be akin to a revolution starting in the West that will get out of control, much like what happened to Russia during the first world war.