Guilty-NOT Guilty-Hung Jury---Last Chance to Make Your NY v. Trump Verdict Prediction

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.


It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.

I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.

Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?

Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?

The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.

If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.

Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?

In at least TWO separate court filings (June '23 and April '24).

And I believe the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct rejected them correct?

Both times, Merchan refused to recuse himself...and the NY Appellate Division upheld his decision.

So i guess there was not enough of a basis to disqualify him then correct?

It means they are simpatico with Merchan and his agenda.

Does it? They must all be in on it because they disagree with assertion?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: EndTime

Except the statue of limitations has expired for that crime.

That is one area I am very unsure of. I am not familiar enough with the latest justification.

If it was a misdemeanor, it would be past the statute of limitations. But Braggs is charging Trump with felony charges, so it's not.

How is he doing that exactly?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude

so you are trolling and factually ignorant. Noted. Expected. Typical.

Again. Donald Trump declared that Mother Teressa couldn't beat these charges. Yet here you are, trying to challenge me, because of my post citing Donald Trump's view, wanting ME to relitigate and defend the evidence that Donald Trump is convinced would convict Mother Teressa.

I'm not going to do it. Me thinks you're the troll.

why don't you post his exact words and a link to them so you can show the group what you are lying about now. Because you are totally lying, but it's just what you do. Prove me wrong.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Too me, those people were demonstrating TDS. I just wanted to remind them that Donald Trump seems to think that the prosecution made their case.

That is not what Donald Trump thinks or has said at all.

It is very clear that Donald Trump thinks the judge and DA have staked the deck against him; and that any innocent person would be found guilty with this corrupt judge and DA.

Trump can certainly be wrong ....

But your subjectivity is clearly clouded if you think Donald Trump thinks the prosecutors made their case. Nothing Trump has said or has done suggestes he thinks they made their case.

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.


It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.

I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.

Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?

Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?

The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.

If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.

Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?

In at least TWO separate court filings (June '23 and April '24).

And I believe the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct rejected them correct?

Both times, Merchan refused to recuse himself...and the NY Appellate Division upheld his decision.

So i guess there was not enough of a basis to disqualify him then correct?

Say your name is 'BOB' and you are being tried by a judge who financially supports an organization called 'STOP Guys Named BOB'.

Would you consider that grounds for the judge's recusal?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: EndTime

Except the statue of limitations has expired for that crime.

That is one area I am very unsure of. I am not familiar enough with the latest justification.

If it was a misdemeanor, it would be past the statute of limitations. But Braggs is charging Trump with felony charges, so it's not.

Thank you, I think most are for 3-6 years, with a few exceptions for heinous crimes like murder, rape, etc. It does seem like a fine line for me that I could not find a complete answer to for this specific trial.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.


It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.

I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.

Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?

Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?

The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.

But the New York state commission on judicial conduct has not revealed who lodged the complaint against Merchan that stems from a $35 donation to the Democratic group ActBlue that included $15 earmarked for Biden for President and $10 each to Progressive Turnout Project and Stop Republicans.

Source

It was $35 donation, $10 going to Stop Republicans, not Stop Trump… although at this point the Republican Party might as well be called the Trump party.

Also, I highly doubt his daughter is making millions as a Democratic political consultant. The company she works for might be, but not her personally. Either way, Judge Merchan has nothing to do with the company.

a reply to: JadedGhost

She's the president of the company.....

Why are you guys so slim on factual knowledge?

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.


It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.

I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.

Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?

Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?

The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.

If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.

Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?

In at least TWO separate court filings (June '23 and April '24).

And I believe the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct rejected them correct?

Both times, Merchan refused to recuse himself...and the NY Appellate Division upheld his decision.

So i guess there was not enough of a basis to disqualify him then correct?

Say your name is 'BOB' and you are being tried by a judge who financially supports an organization called 'STOP Guys Named BOB'.

Would you consider that grounds for the judge's recusal?

Would it be specifically a "stop bob" fund or some else a little bit more general?

a reply to: Dandandat3

That is not what Donald Trump thinks or has said at all.

That's exactly what he said.

“Mother Teresa could not beat these charges,” Trump said to a gaggle of reporters in the hallway. “These charges are rigged. The whole thing is rigged.”

www.politico.com...

It doesn't matter if he thinks the charges are rigged. He said Mother Teressa couldn't beat them. Why? Because the rigged charges have been proven!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Dandandat3

That is not what Donald Trump thinks or has said at all.

That's exactly what he said.

“Mother Teresa could not beat these charges,” Trump said to a gaggle of reporters in the hallway. “These charges are rigged. The whole thing is rigged.”

www.politico.com...

It doesn't matter if he thinks the charges are rigged. He said Mother Teressa couldn't beat them. Why? Because the rigged charges have been proven!

Do I see a breakthrough in that post?

You are finally admitting that it’s rigged against Trump.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Would you feel the same way about a Trump appointed judge or a Republican judge who donated $35 to a political non-profit to buy a t-shirt that supports Republican ideas?

Should Ailene Cannon recuse herself? She donated money to Trump's campaign. Also, she's from Columbia, just like Merchan!

a reply to: Dandandat3

Exactly: "Mother Theresa would be found guilty" of these charges, with this judge in charge.

“I would say, in listening to the charges from the judge, who’s, as you know, very conflicted, and corrupt, because of the confliction, very very corrupt, Mother Teresa could not beat these charges,” Trump said.

DJT on 5.29.2024: newrepublic.com...

His statement makes liberals angry, which is a good thing. Prepares them for easier achievement of CARDIAC events, after the election.

a reply to: JadedGhost

Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case

Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations — and used the case in their solicitation emails — raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.

The judge’s daughter, Loren Merchan, is president of Authentic Campaigns, a Chicago-based progressive political consulting firm whose top clients include Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who was the lead prosecutor in Trump’s first impeachment trial, and the Senate Majority PAC, a major party fundraiser.

Merchan's daughter works for Adam Schiff ...

Loren Merchan — who worked for Vice President Kamala Harris’ 2020 presidential campaign as “director of digital persuasion” — has said her father detests politicians using Twitter, an apparent reference to Trump.

...and worked for Kamala Harris in 2020.

nypost.com...

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Dandandat3

That is not what Donald Trump thinks or has said at all.

That's exactly what he said.

“Mother Teresa could not beat these charges,” Trump said to a gaggle of reporters in the hallway. “These charges are rigged. The whole thing is rigged.”

www.politico.com...

It doesn't matter if he thinks the charges are rigged. He said Mother Teressa couldn't beat them. Why? Because the rigged charges have been proven!

Do I see a breakthrough in that post?

You are finally admitting that it’s rigged against Trump.

Phffft! NO I'm quoting Trump. Trump said that Mother Teressa couldn't beat the charges. It doesn't matter that he thinks the charges are rigged. The only reason Mother Teressa wouldn't be able to beat them is if the jury believed that the charges were proven to be true, regardless of whether or not Trump thought the charges were rigged.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude

so you are trolling and factually ignorant. Noted. Expected. Typical.

Again. Donald Trump declared that Mother Teressa couldn't beat these charges. Yet here you are, trying to challenge me, because of my post citing Donald Trump's view, wanting ME to relitigate and defend the evidence that Donald Trump is convinced would convict Mother Teressa.

I'm not going to do it. Me thinks you're the troll.

Only Stepford Humans don't understand what a metaphoric reference is. 😃

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Dandandat3

That is not what Donald Trump thinks or has said at all.

That's exactly what he said.

“Mother Teresa could not beat these charges,” Trump said to a gaggle of reporters in the hallway. “These charges are rigged. The whole thing is rigged.”

www.politico.com...

It doesn't matter if he thinks the charges are rigged. He said Mother Teressa couldn't beat them. Why? Because the rigged charges have been proven!

Do I see a breakthrough in that post?

You are finally admitting that it’s rigged against Trump.

Phffft! NO I'm quoting Trump. Trump said that Mother Teressa couldn't beat the charges. It doesn't matter that he thinks the charges are rigged. The only reason Mother Teressa wouldn't be able to beat them is if the jury believed that the charges were proven to be true, regardless of whether or not Trump thought the charges were rigged.

I figured you wouldn’t man up and tell the truth.

Carry on.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Dandandat3

That is not what Donald Trump thinks or has said at all.

That's exactly what he said.

“Mother Teresa could not beat these charges,” Trump said to a gaggle of reporters in the hallway. “These charges are rigged. The whole thing is rigged.”

www.politico.com...

It doesn't matter if he thinks the charges are rigged. He said Mother Teressa couldn't beat them. Why? Because the rigged charges have been proven!

Do I see a breakthrough in that post?

You are finally admitting that it’s rigged against Trump.

Phffft! NO I'm quoting Trump. Trump said that Mother Teressa couldn't beat the charges. It doesn't matter that he thinks the charges are rigged. The only reason Mother Teressa wouldn't be able to beat them is if the jury believed that the charges were proven to be true, regardless of whether or not Trump thought the charges were rigged.

...that moment the abyss stares back.

originally posted by: Dandandat3

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Too me, those people were demonstrating TDS. I just wanted to remind them that Donald Trump seems to think that the prosecution made their case.

That is not what Donald Trump thinks or has said at all.

It is very clear that Donald Trump thinks the judge and DA have staked the deck against him; and that any innocent person would be found guilty with this corrupt judge and DA.

Trump can certainly be wrong ....

But your subjectivity is clearly clouded if you think Donald Trump thinks the prosecutors made their case. Nothing Trump has said or has done suggestes he thinks they made their case.

This is correct.

Trump had planned on testifying in this trial.
The prosecution offered up nothing so Trump didn’t even need to defend himself.
That’s how weak the prosecution’s case ended up.

All they have is a biased judge putting his thumbs on the scales of justice and a politically biased jury.
That’s their whole case.