It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha
I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.
It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.
I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.
Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?
Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?
The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.
If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.
I'm hearing rumors that Merchan's daughter is getting donators seats in the courtroom....
The trial is a politically-motivated s#it circus.
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: EndTime
Because he would be talking about something the judge felt was irrelevant however the prosecution are basing all of their arguments on election interference.
I would call it judicial interference. They did not allow someone for the defense to testify who could have an impact on the Prosecution.
Arn't the charges falsifying business records, concealing crimes, etc.?
Sorta. But election fraud / illegal campaign contributions is being used to take it up a notch to a felony? 34 counts of a felony?
you're invested in this case, while I'm not.
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha
I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.
It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.
I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.
Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?
Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?
The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.
If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.
Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha
I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.
It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.
I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.
Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?
Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?
The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.
If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.
Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?
In at least TWO separate court filings (June '23 and April '24).
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: Sookiechacha
you're invested in this case, while I'm not.
That’s a flat out lie.
Just stop.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
"Cooking the books" is always illegal.
ok, explain what he "cooked". Explain it like you understand it.
I already told you that I'm not going to argue the evidence, that was presented at trial and on which the jury currently deliberating. I'm not going to relitigate the evidence with you.
Again, Donald Trump made the claim that even Mother Terressa would be found guilty. So, he thinks the evidence is compelling.
But hey, hope springs eternal! There's a good chance that there's someone just like you one the jury!
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
"Cooking the books" is always illegal.
ok, explain what he "cooked". Explain it like you understand it.
I already told you that I'm not going to argue the evidence, that was presented at trial and on which the jury currently deliberating. I'm not going to relitigate the evidence with you.
Again, Donald Trump made the claim that even Mother Terressa would be found guilty. So, he thinks the evidence is compelling.
But hey, hope springs eternal! There's a good chance that there's someone just like you one the jury!
so you are trolling and factually ignorant. Noted. Expected. Typical.
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha
I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.
It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.
I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.
Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?
Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?
The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.
If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.
Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?
In at least TWO separate court filings (June '23 and April '24).
And I believe the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct rejected them correct?
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha
I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.
It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.
I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.
Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?
Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?
The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.
If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.
Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?
In at least TWO separate court filings (June '23 and April '24).
And I believe the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct rejected them correct?
Both times, Merchan refused to recuse himself...and the NY Appellate Division upheld his decision.
originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: EndTime
Except the statue of limitations has expired for that crime.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: wAnchorofCarp
Whatever, you're invested in this case, while I'm not.
This case isn't going to change anything. And, even if Trump is found guilty, he will appeal, and it'll drag on for years. There is absolutely no F*ing way that Donald Trump will be sentenced to a prison cell. Even Ferdinand Marcos didn't go to prison, the USA put him up in Hawaii.
Now, the RICO case and the Classified Documents case, those I'm interested in.
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: EndTime
Except the statue of limitations has expired for that crime.
That is one area I am very unsure of. I am not familiar enough with the latest justification.
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: wAnchorofCarp
a reply to: Sookiechacha
I always enjoy when you double down on the factual evidence against your opinions.
It's like a snapshot into the current day mental health crisis.
I will accept the jury's verdict, regardless.
Even if the jury's verdict is based upon the direction of a irreparably conflicted and biased judge?
Should registered republicans only be judged by other republicans?
The Judge donated to an organization called 'STOP TRUMP'.
His daughter is making millions working to elect democrats.
If a republican judge in a trial against a democrat had that amount of confliction and wouldn't recuse themselves, I'd feel the same way.
Did the defense file a motion to disqualify the judge?
In at least TWO separate court filings (June '23 and April '24).
And I believe the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct rejected them correct?
Both times, Merchan refused to recuse himself...and the NY Appellate Division upheld his decision.
So i guess there was not enough of a basis to disqualify him then correct?
so you are trolling and factually ignorant. Noted. Expected. Typical.
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: Lazy88
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: EndTime
Because he would be talking about something the judge felt was irrelevant however the prosecution are basing all of their arguments on election interference.
I would call it judicial interference. They did not allow someone for the defense to testify who could have an impact on the Prosecution.
Arn't the charges falsifying business records, concealing crimes, etc.?
Sorta. But election fraud / illegal campaign contributions is being used to take it up a notch to a felony? 34 counts of a felony?
So there is still the matter at hand of whether or not Trump is guilty of falsifying business records and and tried to conceal other actions correct? If so, how would someone from the FEC be able to testify to that?
originally posted by: EndTime
originally posted by: SomeStupidName
a reply to: EndTime
Except the statue of limitations has expired for that crime.
That is one area I am very unsure of. I am not familiar enough with the latest justification.