Breaking--Hamas Accepts New Cease Fire

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: jofafot

I am genuinely confused. If you think all germans were nazis why haven't you killed all nazis?

Because they surrendered.

Duh.

Hamas pig-dogs have 4 battalions left in Rafah...they should surrender too.

That's all they need to do.

How 'bout if Hamass surrenders...but promises to kill LESS Jews?
They seem to really love killing Jews.

Isn't that Biden's position?

Exactly.

There was peace in the middle east during the Ottoman empire....after the crusades and before WWI. Left to themselves, the Muslims were peaceful and not just with each other but with everyone.

While the imperial-capitalists are projecting THEIR sh@t ,
. . they are AVOIDING Lol: FACT
THAT ZIONISTS ARE KILLING CHRISTIANS TOO.
Are the Christians terrorists ?
By the zionists definition yes, non-jews are ALL 'enemies',
including their own who are NOT on board with Jingoism,
nor support western imperial-capitalism.

_____________________

a reply to: ToneD

Zi·on·ism
[ˈzīəˌnizəm]
noun
a movement for (originally) the re-establishment and (now) the development and protection of a Jewish nation in what is now Israel. It was established as a political organization in 1897 under Theodor Herzl, and was later led by Chaim Weizmann.

You really need to stop making up definitions.

a reply to: AliceTheSmall

Yes, there was a time when Jews and Muslims lived peacefully.

www.historytoday.com...

Most people, Jews/Muslims/Christians aren't interested in killing anyone.

They just want food, freedom and a safe place.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: jofafot

I am genuinely confused. If you think all germans were nazis why haven't you killed all nazis?

Because they surrendered.

Duh.

So I see, if there was never an official surrender, then you would have killed every German?

Honey, that's not war - it's genocide.

So if someone was 75% German and 25% Jewish - kill them?
What about the bi-racial people in Southern Germany - kill them too?

I believe the cut-off percentage for Hitler was 25% - what's yours?

a reply to: Daughter2v2

We would have killed every enemy in that country until they surrendered.

This is what war is.

Don't you understand?

a reply to: DBCowboy

When you define "enemy" as everyone belonging to an ethnic or religious group

That's not war.

The word is genocide!

a reply to: DBCowboy

Not according to the/ Geneva Convention.

You must be actively taking part in the hostilities. Even soldiers without weapons are considered civilians"

1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.

It doesn't say "support' /voted for - active part. How are little four year old girls taking active parts?

originally posted by: Daughter2v2
a reply to: DBCowboy

When you define "enemy" as everyone belonging to an ethnic or religious group

That's not war.

The word is genocide!

Umm, then have everyone from that "ethic group" stop killing jews.

a reply to: Daughter2v2

Whats the Geneva Convention say about fighting cowardly pussy terrorists?

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Daughter2v2

Whats the Geneva Convention say about fighting cowardly pussy terrorists?

Last I checked, cowardly pussy terrorists like pig-dog Hamass don't hold the Geneva Convention in very high regard.

I forget...how many civilian hostages did they take, rape, torture and kill?

a reply to: CarlLaFong

But my tax dollars are funding Israel and not Hamas, so yeah I want it to apply......

Though I agree it's morally wrong there's also a self serving reason not to use Israel's moral standard,

In the US, we all pretty much agree we had crazy leaders who could possibly lead us into WWIII.

I don't want to have bombs dropped on my neighbor because some country deems me a terrorist supporter.

I don't want a war and I really, really don't want wars that target civilians.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Daughter2v2

We would have killed every enemy in that country until they surrendered.

This is what war is.

Don't you understand?

Depends on what you define enemy.

I think you are admitting war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Israel has no issue killing tens of thousands of innocent people and how many more are missing or used the rubble?

The posters on your side can't answer whether Israel occupies Palestine or it's the other way around.

a reply to: ToneD

Noice.

Going on the hate train because we don't support the elimination of der joos.

lol

a reply to: Demorish

Child?

Have you ever #ing fought in a war?

If not, don't dare lecture us that have.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Daughter2v2

We would have killed every enemy in that country until they surrendered.

This is what war is.

Don't you understand?

No, they don’t get it. They are incapable of grasping simple 1st grade logic and it’s a complete waste of time trying to explain anything to them. They/them/it will ask questions that have already been answered multiple times and they’re always deflecting. Their spiel is all the same from one to the next with the same ignorant arguments. Although, I do find the fact that they star themselves with their sock accounts or anyone that has the same narrative amusing and cheap entertainment. Definitely setting new ban records😂

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Multiple accounts just to promote hamas.