DEI is a mens movement

originally posted by: Threadbarer
What about someone that has androgen insensitivity syndrome that presents in every physical way as female but has an XY chromosome?

Should the law consider them as men or women?

Never heard of it. Had to look it up. Stats I saw say that 5 people per million have it, some other sites have other numbers. Information also says it can be mostly cured through surgery. The person is male.

It's still down to XX/XY

originally posted by: Threadbarer

What about someone that has androgen insensitivity syndrome that presents in every physical way as female but has an XY chromosome?

Should the law consider them as men or women?

What if your aunt had balls? She would be your uncle... I couldn't pass up that what if...

a reply to: Xtrozero

As of 2021, Whites made up 77% of the work force. They only make up 60% of the population.

Females make up 46% of the work force while making up 50% of the total population.

White guys are still being disproportionately hired compared to other demographics. Do you believe that white guys are just that much better than everyone else?

originally posted by: FlyersFan
Don't know anything about him, his qualifications, the demographics ... don't know if people voted for him because he's qualified or simply because he's black. I have no 'thoughts' on this matter. Don't know enough about it to make a statement.

Being Baltimore it is highly likely they voted on him mainly because he is Black, but that does NOT create a DEI scenario. I think people are mixing some things up here. DEI is a forced requirement that doesn't take ability/skills into account. If the Mayor was voted in three times it could be because he is Black, or just name recognition, but that has nothing to do with DEI.

a reply to: Threadbarer

“KJB realized that some overgeneralized definition could negatively impact marginalized populations so decided to answer with ‘I’m not a biologist.”

Proven activist judge and not a smart one.
Only hired because black and female and it’s not a secret.

More importantly, just look at what she’s done in her short tenure there.🤡
What a joke.
She’s making Kagan look sane.

originally posted by: Threadbarer

As of 2021, Whites made up 77% of the work force. They only make up 60% of the population.

Females make up 46% of the work force while making up 50% of the total population.

White guys are still being disproportionately hired compared to other demographics. Do you believe that white guys are just that much better than everyone else?

Once again, what is the context?

Blacks are 13% of the population and makeup 13% of the workforce.
Asians are 7% of the population and makeup 7% of the workforce.

That 77% is both Whites and all those Brown people too...lol

58% of the population is White/Non-Hispanic.
20% of the population is Hispanic.

58 + 20 = 78%


Now for females...I'm surprised it's 46% and not lower. Many more women can choose to work or not than men. Men have no choice in that area. 25% of mothers identify as stay-at-home moms...and growing as women are getting tired of that work BS. The highest percentage of women in the work force are Black women, you want to guess why?

You know that just as I know that, but you seem to want to make it a point.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Xtrozero

As of 2021, Whites made up 77% of the work force. They only make up 60% of the population.

Females make up 46% of the work force while making up 50% of the total population.

White guys are still being disproportionately hired compared to other demographics. Do you believe that white guys are just that much better than everyone else?

Employment % rate by race…
Mexican 64
Hisp/Latino 63.5
Asian 63.1
Cuban 61.8
White 60.2
Black 59.6
Puerto Rican 57.3

Disproportionately hired you say?
Everyone looks gainfully employed. 🤷‍♂️

a reply to: FlyersFan

So if someone with androgen insensitivity syndrome, someone that only has female sex characteristics and that what they've had their whole life, is convicted of a crime you believe they should be sent to a men's correctional facility?

originally posted by: Threadbarer

So if someone with androgen insensitivity syndrome, someone that only has female sex characteristics and that what they've had their whole life, is convicted of a crime you believe they should be sent to a men's correctional facility?

Full androgen insensitivity syndrome, raised as a girl would give the least negative outcome.
Partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, raised as a boy would give the least negative outcome.

Full Trans female, then use the woman's bathroom.
Non-transition Trans females then use the men's bathroom.
Zero women's sport for trans female...

Trans men...who cares let them use whatever...
No women's sports either. Men's sports...good luck

So simple

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: MauiWaui

Oh please! For every man in a women's bathroom there are thousands of otherwise disenfranchised men and women who have benefited from diversity, inclusion and equity. People like Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powel, Clarence Thomas and Tulsi Gabbard all benefited from so called DEI.

Any business that does not provide a safe for women and female children bathroom or locker room is bigoted and anti-women.

Pervs who prey on women and children are thrilled that they can now gain access to their victims so easily. To them, anyone pushing DEI is their hero.

The people you listed did not benefit from pervs using women's bathrooms. They benefited from bigotry slowly disappearing in the West.

It's rare to find a member of LGB... that thinks it's OK, I'm sure. They are likely embarrassed by it all. This has zero to do with making progress. It's just radicals who want to be the center of attention that don't care if they are in fact helping out pervs with finding victims.

a reply to: Vermilion

Name even one other jurist you believe is more qualified than her that isn't on SCOTUS and explain what makes them more qualified.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Xtrozero

As of 2021, Whites made up 77% of the work force. They only make up 60% of the population.

Females make up 46% of the work force while making up 50% of the total population.

White guys are still being disproportionately hired compared to other demographics. Do you believe that white guys are just that much better than everyone else?

Are those nit picky statistics taking into account for "Stay at Home" Mothers (Women) ?? 😀

originally posted by: Vermilion
Makes sense.
Hard to compare apples to oranges.
Health insurance for women is much more expensive, as an example.

My wife works like 20 hours a week just to do something, and I make a crap load of money that gives her that choice to work or not. A lot of women work but follow the careers of their husbands too. What this means is their husband gets a promotion and is forced to move and they are then forced to find a new job. Many women drop out of the workforce once they have kids...men don't do that. Women will pass over promotions because the new job doesn't align with the families' lifestyle too.

I have a woman who works for me who is a single mom. She asked me "What am I to do with my life?", and I told her for the next 8 years just do the job you have now. Her kid is 6 and so the job I have her in allows her to take care of her son too. Other males in the same job do other things like they would go to Afghanistan to work, and she could not do that. At the end of the year, her paycheck would be 85k and these other guys in the same job would have 150k as they spent many months overseas too. I'm sure that went into the oh men make more than women argument too.

originally posted by: xuenchen

Are those nit picky statistics taking into account for "Stay at Home" Mothers (Women) ?? 😀

Which is 25% and growing... That is why I'm surprised with the 46%, but then thinking about it, 70% of Black kids today live with a single mother so the mom needs to work, and the deadbeat dad does nothing.

originally posted by: Threadbarer

Name even one other jurist you believe is more qualified than her that isn't on SCOTUS and explain what makes them more qualified.

And who are you to demand anything?

Are you going with she is the best of the best? Yes or No...

a reply to: Xtrozero

No. I'm saying she's qualified for the position. If you don't think she's qualified for the position then you must have an example of someone that is more qualified.

If you don't, and you can't explain why you think their more qualified, then it seems like your just repeating political talking points and don't actually know anything about what you're talking about.

a reply to: Blaine91555

Pervs who prey on women and children are thrilled that they can now gain access to their victims so easily.

I've got news for you. It's always been easy for pervs to find a way to gain access to vulnerable children. Whether it's scouting, community outreach, church, schools or sports, pervs have aways found easy access to vulnerable children.

I used to do costumes for a non-profit children's community theatre, and I can tell you from 1st hand experience, it wasn't the LGBT folks that you had look out for.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
If you don't, and you can't explain why you think their more qualified, then it seems like your just repeating political talking points and don't actually know anything about what you're talking about.

You see that is the issue. I guess we will just need to let time show us. It did take her a good amount of time to write her first opinion about the dispute between Delaware and other states over unclaimed MoneyGram checks. Pretty damn lackluster...lol

Biden came out and said he would put a Black Female on the court and that is what he did. She might be the best and we may never know as we can't say she is because he was better than XX other candidates. I think she was better than 2 others while there are 1000s to pick from.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Xtrozero

DEI also creates a cloud over the heads of minorities and Women. Did they get picked/hired because they were the best of xx candidates or did, they get hired because of a non-skill-based requirement?

Can't we apply the same in reverse. Decades of research show that less qualified white men are more likely to be hired than more qualified minorities.

How are we to know the white guy that's getting hired is actually the best candidate?

Why is there only a cloud over the heads' of minorities when, historically, it's the white guy that's getting hired above his ability?

That is Annee's argument, but then she grew up in the 50s. I'll give you the same answer... I agree with you if we went back a good number of decades, even more so for women.

I would say past 2000 it has all been moot now as people hire to get the best they can. If they don't then they are only hurting their own company. The only discriminations today that are sneaky are age and health. Companies don't want the burden of unhealthy people.

Don’t use my post and ignore this part.

“TODAY -- just in reference to handicap parking spaces. People are rude, uncaring, and abusive.”

Attitudes have not changed in 70 years just because of a law/act.

originally posted by: Annee

Don’t use my post and ignore this part.

“TODAY -- just in reference to handicap parking spaces. People are rude, uncaring, and abusive.”

Attitudes have not changed in 70 years just because of a law/act.

I didn't use your post; I used your attitude.

I have no clue what you mean above. Who is rude, the handicapped or others? Are you saying non-handicapped people steal handicapped parking? Who knows, but I would not want to pay the fine.

BTW what does that have to do with anything talked about here?