It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: Sookiechacha
His son in law Jared. He got a couple billion from Saudi Arabia. Remember?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Phoenix
originally posted by: Annee
Trump "Cooked the Books".
Decades working commercial real estate here,
Unlike residential homes commercial real estate is valued mainly on current and future leasehold valuation or income stream and minorly on the hard asset itself.
Cooking books would be be lying about current leasehold income vs operational expenses.
Nothing in the clown show Engoron put on touched these concepts.
It was very much like an old Soviet show trial where guilt was adjudicated from bench and then summary execution for the victim whose only crime was disagreement wit TPTB.
Poor old gal knows nothing but old sayings and her own home cooked silliness. Every moment spent trying to communicate with her is a moment wasted.
It’s what the internet offers to people like this. They’ve got nowhere else to be.
I could say what I think if you.
But that’s against the rules.
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: arcticshuffle
Trump will get over $3b when 'Truth Social' goes public very soon. That $ becomes liquid 6 months after the IPO.
This was likely part of the recent discussion DT had with Elon Musk regarding a short term $500m cash loan.
Isn’t it odd how our little gaggle of leftists always announces day after day, that every business venture by Trump or Musk has failed ? And then we wake up again and again to find that each one is reaping billions and achieving historic successes.
What a bunch of infantile clowns 24 / 7.
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Phoenix
originally posted by: Annee
Trump "Cooked the Books".
Decades working commercial real estate here,
Unlike residential homes commercial real estate is valued mainly on current and future leasehold valuation or income stream and minorly on the hard asset itself.
Cooking books would be be lying about current leasehold income vs operational expenses.
Nothing in the clown show Engoron put on touched these concepts.
It was very much like an old Soviet show trial where guilt was adjudicated from bench and then summary execution for the victim whose only crime was disagreement wit TPTB.
Poor old gal knows nothing but old sayings and her own home cooked silliness. Every moment spent trying to communicate with her is a moment wasted.
It’s what the internet offers to people like this. They’ve got nowhere else to be.
I could say what I think if you.
But that’s against the rules.
Send me a PM. I won’t reply other than to say have a good day. I’m a big boy. Anything I’ve said here is accurate, even if a bit rough. Your posts are insufferable, but it is a free country still !
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: arcticshuffle
originally posted by: Phoenix
originally posted by: Annee
Trump "Cooked the Books".
Decades working commercial real estate here,
Unlike residential homes commercial real estate is valued mainly on current and future leasehold valuation or income stream and minorly on the hard asset itself.
Cooking books would be be lying about current leasehold income vs operational expenses.
Nothing in the clown show Engoron put on touched these concepts.
It was very much like an old Soviet show trial where guilt was adjudicated from bench and then summary execution for the victim whose only crime was disagreement wit TPTB.
Poor old gal knows nothing but old sayings and her own home cooked silliness. Every moment spent trying to communicate with her is a moment wasted.
It’s what the internet offers to people like this. They’ve got nowhere else to be.
I could say what I think if you.
But that’s against the rules.
Send me a PM. I won’t reply other than to say have a good day. I’m a big boy. Anything I’ve said here is accurate, even if a bit rough. Your posts are insufferable, but it is a free country still !
No & No
originally posted by: CarlLaFong
Chilling effect to ALL real estate owners, developers and investors in NYC.
If they can pull this with Trump...NOBODY who owns or hopes to own real estate in NYC is safe from partisan government lawfare.
originally posted by: Annee
Fraud is the purposeful misrepresentation of fact. For fraud to have occurred, it isn’t necessary for there to have been damages incurred by a victim.
But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Only loons and losers who want to steal things take this approach like AG James has perpetrated upon all of NYC, period. To call a successful transaction that helped both parties in a two party contract as fraudulent sounds absurd to even a dumbass.
originally posted by: Annee
Fraud is the purposeful misrepresentation of fact. For fraud to have occurred, it isn’t necessary for there to have been damages incurred by a victim.
But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Justoneman
Only loons and losers who want to steal things take this approach like AG James has perpetrated upon all of NYC, period. To call a successful transaction that helped both parties in a two party contract as fraudulent sounds absurd to even a dumbass.
originally posted by: Annee
Fraud is the purposeful misrepresentation of fact. For fraud to have occurred, it isn’t necessary for there to have been damages incurred by a victim.
But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.
I didn’t make it up.
Fraud is fraud. It is a crime.
Trump was found guilty. It is what it is.
Trying to twist it to not be what it is — is really ridiculous.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Justoneman
Only loons and losers who want to steal things take this approach like AG James has perpetrated upon all of NYC, period. To call a successful transaction that helped both parties in a two party contract as fraudulent sounds absurd to even a dumbass.
originally posted by: Annee
Fraud is the purposeful misrepresentation of fact. For fraud to have occurred, it isn’t necessary for there to have been damages incurred by a victim.
But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.
I didn’t make it up.
Fraud is fraud. It is a crime.
Trump was found guilty. It is what it is.
Trying to twist it to not be what it is — is really ridiculous.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Annee
No, Trump didn't cook the books. The left cooked the books in their spiteful little minds, and then transferred their own guilt onto Trump because they are desperate to hold onto power.
You can lie forever but it's only in your mind that it's true. Everyone else can see it.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Annee
No, Trump didn't cook the books. The left cooked the books in their spiteful little minds, and then transferred their own guilt onto Trump because they are desperate to hold onto power.
You can lie forever but it's only in your mind that it's true. Everyone else can see it.
BINGO!!!!
The truth shall set us ALL FREE!
originally posted by: Justoneman
Sure you did.
You made it up and that is how this game works.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Justoneman
Only loons and losers who want to steal things take this approach like AG James has perpetrated upon all of NYC, period. To call a successful transaction that helped both parties in a two party contract as fraudulent sounds absurd to even a dumbass.
originally posted by: Annee
Fraud is the purposeful misrepresentation of fact. For fraud to have occurred, it isn’t necessary for there to have been damages incurred by a victim.
But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.
I didn’t make it up.
Fraud is fraud. It is a crime.
Trump was found guilty. It is what it is.
Trying to twist it to not be what it is — is really ridiculous.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Annee
No, Trump didn't cook the books. The left cooked the books in their spiteful little minds, and then transferred their own guilt onto Trump because they are desperate to hold onto power.
You can lie forever but it's only in your mind that it's true. Everyone else can see it.
BINGO!!!!
The truth shall set us ALL FREE!
Yes, it will.
Especially since the "cooked books" are verifiable in black and white print.