Harvard Diversity Officer Accused of 40 Counts of Plagiarism

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
I think Jay1980 has is right. What do you really want to discuss?

He was talking about the Harvard ex-President.
This thread is about the Diversity Officer.
They are not the same person.
Totally different topic.
He was dead wrong.
And now ... since you think they are the same person ... so are you.

So we got her title wrong, let's move on to the real issue. I see many of the usual members have already broached the real topic of this thread. Diversity and why we hate it, everywhere.

ETA: wikipedia

Claudine Gay (born 1970)[2][3] is an American political scientist and academic administrator who was the 30th president of Harvard University, and is the Wilbur A. Cowett Professor of Government and of African and African-American Studies at Harvard.

a reply to: quintessentone

People in her position or prestige pay others to make sure they do not make mistakes.

Stop defending her, she is a piece of crap.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

People in her position or prestige pay others to make sure they do not make mistakes.

Stop defending her, she is a piece of crap.

An independent panel absolved her of being a piece of crap, again, sorry.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry to say this, but in your ignorance of defending what this woman in her prestigious position has done you are completely lost in the sauce, my friend.

Her diversity and skin color is not an excuse for her deplorable behavior on stealing other people's intellectual properties.

Diversity my latino butt, she is a liar and an opportunist no giving credit to others or maybe the intellectual work she has stolen belong to a white person and is all good.

An independent panel found she made citing mistakes nothing more. The only deplorable behaviour is from those on this thread that spew hate for the diversity paradigm change.

explain the sighting mistakes. IN YOUR OWN WORDS so that we know you aren't borrowing someone elses ideas. And look into the definition of plagiarism so you fully grasp the straws you are grasping at.

a reply to: quintessentone

An independent panel found otherwise...sorry.

ha, this from your link tells me Havard is covering hers and their ass by saying their is no evidence.

from your link,

It also found that a third paper, written by Gay during her first year in graduate school, contained “identical language to that previously published by others."

identical language, i guess as time went on she got better.

then this from your link,

The corporation initially rallied behind Gay, saying a review of her scholarly work turned up “a few instances of inadequate citation” but no evidence of research misconduct. The allegations of plagiarism continued to surface through December and Gay resigned this month.

when congress got involved it was time to cut bait, can't loose all those govt funds.

first allowing her to correct her papers, then congress gets involved and she resigned. you can bet they gave her the choice resign or be fired.

if it was me and i was innocent, i would have fought harder to clear my name.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry to say this, but in your ignorance of defending what this woman in her prestigious position has done you are completely lost in the sauce, my friend.

Her diversity and skin color is not an excuse for her deplorable behavior on stealing other people's intellectual properties.

Diversity my latino butt, she is a liar and an opportunist no giving credit to others or maybe the intellectual work she has stolen belong to a white person and is all good.

An independent panel found she made citing mistakes nothing more. The only deplorable behaviour is from those on this thread that spew hate for the diversity paradigm change.

explain the sighting mistakes. IN YOUR OWN WORDS so that we know you aren't borrowing someone elses ideas. And look into the definition of plagiarism so you fully grasp the straws you are grasping at.

I don't have to the independent panel already did - so move on. Put that in your signature.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
I think Jay1980 has is right. What do you really want to discuss?

He was talking about the Harvard ex-President.
This thread is about the Diversity Officer.
They are not the same person.
Totally different topic.
He was dead wrong.
And now ... since you think they are the same person ... so are you.

So we got her title wrong, let's move on to the real issue. I see many of the usual members have already broached the real topic of this thread. Diversity and why we hate it, everywhere.

ETA: wikipedia

Claudine Gay (born 1970)[2][3] is an American political scientist and academic administrator who was the 30th president of Harvard University, and is the Wilbur A. Cowett Professor of Government and of African and African-American Studies at Harvard.

and because you eluded to racism, everyone should shut up and accept your flawed reasoning. How about no.

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: quintessentone

An independent panel found otherwise...sorry.

ha, this from your link tells me Havard is covering hers and their ass by saying their is no evidence.

It also found that a third paper, written by Gay during her first year in graduate school, contained “identical language to that previously published by others."

identical language, i guess as time went on she got better.

then this from your link,

The corporation initially rallied behind Gay, saying a review of her scholarly work turned up “a few instances of inadequate citation” but no evidence of research misconduct. The allegations of plagiarism continued to surface through December and Gay resigned this month.

when congress got involved it was time to cut bait, can't loose all those govt funds.

first allowing her to correct her papers, then congress gets involved and she resigned. you can bet they gave her the choice resign or be fired.

if it was me and i was innocent, i would have fought harder to clear my name.

The facts and end results won't change because...you don't like it.

originally posted by: quintessentone
So we got her title wrong,

No. It's not just 'her title' that got wrong. You both went went on yammering thinking this was about the ex-president of Harvard when in fact it's about the Diversity Officer who was ALSO caught plagiarizing. You didn't even read the opening post, or you did and got confused.

let's move on to the real issue.

Getting the facts straight about the entire topic of this thread IS a real issue.

I see many of the usual members have already broached the real topic of this thread. Diversity and why we hate it, everywhere.

That's crap. Are you going to try to claim people are talking about this because those women are black females and that if they were white males it wouldn't be a problem?? Racism and sexism? Bull. People here don't 'hate diversity'. People here hate that the elite at Harvard are getting promoted when they do not deserve it. Students get kicked out of Harvard for doing exactly what these elites have done. People here hate that the elite at Harvard are trying to cover for the bad behavior of other elites. People here hate that Harvard refuses to acknowledge that it is hiring people who do not deserve the jobs they are getting.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry to say this, but in your ignorance of defending what this woman in her prestigious position has done you are completely lost in the sauce, my friend.

Her diversity and skin color is not an excuse for her deplorable behavior on stealing other people's intellectual properties.

Diversity my latino butt, she is a liar and an opportunist no giving credit to others or maybe the intellectual work she has stolen belong to a white person and is all good.

An independent panel found she made citing mistakes nothing more. The only deplorable behaviour is from those on this thread that spew hate for the diversity paradigm change.

explain the sighting mistakes. IN YOUR OWN WORDS so that we know you aren't borrowing someone elses ideas. And look into the definition of plagiarism so you fully grasp the straws you are grasping at.

I don't have to the independent panel already did - so move on. Put that in your signature.

Again, big boys think for themselves. Little minded people let others do their thinking. You sure you want to stick with this story?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
I think Jay1980 has is right. What do you really want to discuss?

He was talking about the Harvard ex-President.
This thread is about the Diversity Officer.
They are not the same person.
Totally different topic.
He was dead wrong.
And now ... since you think they are the same person ... so are you.

So we got her title wrong, let's move on to the real issue. I see many of the usual members have already broached the real topic of this thread. Diversity and why we hate it, everywhere.

ETA: wikipedia

Claudine Gay (born 1970)[2][3] is an American political scientist and academic administrator who was the 30th president of Harvard University, and is the Wilbur A. Cowett Professor of Government and of African and African-American Studies at Harvard.

and because you eluded to racism, everyone should shut up and accept your flawed reasoning. How about no.

The only person mentioning racism is the author of this thread and is mentioned in the opening post.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
So we got her title wrong,

No. It's not just 'her title' that got wrong. You both went went on yammering thinking this was about the ex-president of Harvard when in fact it's about the Diversity Officer who was ALSO caught plagiarizing. You didn't even read the opening post, or you did and got confused.

let's move on to the real issue.

Getting the facts straight about the entire topic of this thread IS a real issue.

I see many of the usual members have already broached the real topic of this thread. Diversity and why we hate it, everywhere.

That's crap. Are you going to try to claim people are talking about this because those women are black females and that if they were white males it wouldn't be a problem?? Racism and sexism? Bull. People here don't 'hate diversity'. People here hate that the elite at Harvard are getting promoted when they do not deserve it. Students get kicked out of Harvard for doing exactly what these elites have done. People here hate that the elite at Harvard are trying to cover for the bad behavior of other elites. People here hate that Harvard refuses to acknowledge that it is hiring people who do not deserve the jobs they are getting.

In case you missed it. That will teach us for researching topics a little further, huh?

Claudine Gay (born 1970)[2][3] is an American political scientist and academic administrator who was the 30th president of Harvard University, and is the Wilbur A. Cowett Professor of Government and of African and African-American Studies at Harvard.

wikipedia

originally posted by: quintessentone
An independent panel absolved her of being a piece of crap, again, sorry.

Where did an independent panel investigate the Diversity Officer of Harvard and show that she didn't plagiarize?
Do you have a link to that?

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: quintessentone

Sorry to say this, but in your ignorance of defending what this woman in her prestigious position has done you are completely lost in the sauce, my friend.

Her diversity and skin color is not an excuse for her deplorable behavior on stealing other people's intellectual properties.

Diversity my latino butt, she is a liar and an opportunist no giving credit to others or maybe the intellectual work she has stolen belong to a white person and is all good.

An independent panel found she made citing mistakes nothing more. The only deplorable behaviour is from those on this thread that spew hate for the diversity paradigm change.

explain the sighting mistakes. IN YOUR OWN WORDS so that we know you aren't borrowing someone elses ideas. And look into the definition of plagiarism so you fully grasp the straws you are grasping at.

I don't have to the independent panel already did - so move on. Put that in your signature.

Again, big boys think for themselves. Little minded people let others do their thinking. You sure you want to stick with this story?

I guess you are a small boy then with a self-imposed imagined big mind.

originally posted by: quintessentone
The only person mentioning racism is the author of this thread and is mentioned in the opening post.

YOU said people hate diversity.
So it's YOU insinuating people are racist and sexist because they want justice.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
An independent panel absolved her of being a piece of crap, again, sorry.

Where did an independent panel investigate the Diversity Officer of Harvard and show that she didn't plagiarize?
Do you have a link to that?

It's posted twice above, good hunting.

a reply to: quintessentone

Again .. what the hell are you talking about? This isn't about Claudine Gay, the Ex-president. This is about the DIVERSITY OFFICER at Harvard. ANOTHER high level black female who got her job even though she PLAGIARIZED at least 40 times.

originally posted by: quintessentone
It's posted twice above, good hunting.

No. Again, this thread isn't about Claudine Gay, the expresident. This thread is about the DIVERSITY OFFICER. Where did an independent panel investigate the Diversity Officer of Harvard and show that she didn't plagiarize? Do you have a link to that?

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: quintessentone
The only person mentioning racism is the author of this thread and is mentioned in the opening post.

YOU said people hate diversity.
So it's YOU insinuating people are racist and sexist because they want justice.

Harvard embraces diversity, people here are posting that they are against in a hateful way (e.g. Gay is a piece of # - sounds like hate to me) what they represent...what meaning can we all take from that?

a reply to: quintessentone

If someone stated that Gay .. whom this thread is NOT about .. is a piece of crap because she plagiarized, then that's not a statement against her being black or female. That's a statement about her CHEATING to get ahead in life and it's a personal opinion/conclusion.