Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

originally posted by: Scratchpost
"%^& "$ $%^&* ~@:%"
dont bane me!

Try being rape't and then verbely bullied.
and see witch one realy hurts the most.
and YEARS later see witch one you remember in Detail !

try being a guy who was accused of rape but didn't do it. I bet that one stings a bit as well.

a reply to: network dude

Men don't have feelings, we aren't allowed to feel the pain of wrongful accusations.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: network dude

Men don't have feelings, we aren't allowed to feel the pain of wrongful accusations.

I could offer sources that men falsely accused of sexual assault aren't harmed at all, but that would be off topic sources because you are always going off topic. Are you asking me for off topic sources = because ... off topic?

a reply to: quintessentone

I don't recall asking you for anything.....unless you have changed your name to ND?


But, I also fail to see how talking about sexual abuse is off topic of sexual abuse....



BTW, you can knock it off with the personal attacks when I wasn't talking to you in the first place bub

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

I don't recall asking you for anything.....unless you have changed your name to ND?


But, I also fail to see how talking about sexual abuse is off topic of sexual abuse....



BTW, you can knock it off with the personal attacks when I wasn't talking to you in the first place bub

You are off topic, this thread is about men, specifically Trump, found liable for sexual assault and defamation, why can't you stay on topic in any thread?

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

I don't recall asking you for anything.....unless you have changed your name to ND?


But, I also fail to see how talking about sexual abuse is off topic of sexual abuse....



BTW, you can knock it off with the personal attacks when I wasn't talking to you in the first place bub

You are off topic, this thread is about men, specifically Trump, found liable for sexual assault and defamation, why can't you stay on topic in any thread?

when you become a moderator, you can take action. Until then, STFU and use the alert button and make your case.

a reply to: quintessentone

I was responding to another member, not you, get bent


BTW, the topic of the thread, as per the title, is "words are worth13x than sexual abuse". Get a clew bud

Go find someone else to be love struck by

originally posted by: Scratchpost
"%^& "$ $%^&* ~@:%"
dont bane me!

Try being rape't and then verbely bullied.
and see witch one realy hurts the most.
and YEARS later see witch one you remember in Detail !

It's part of the control the rapists seem to think they still have, perhaps society still allows them to have it to a certain extent because we can see how some here join in with each other and think it's okay to victimize the victim after a judge and two juries find her telling the truth.

Consider 63% of sexual assaults are never reported to police and 12% of child abuse is reported to authorities.

www.nsvrc.org...

Source = on topic.

The attorney accused by Habba in her filing of an inappropriate relationship the judge has with her, as Habba claims he was her "mentor" has responded to the filing.

Here are the facts: Paul, Weiss is a large law firm with offices in several cities in the United States and abroad. Its litigation department, which was founded by Judge Simon H. Rifkind in 1950, has long been both large and prominent.

After graduating from Columbia law school in 1991, I clerked for a year for the Honorable Mark L. Wolf in the District of Massachusetts and then moved back to New York City to start work as a junior litigation associate at the firm in October 1992. At the time I started at Paul, Weiss, Your Honor was a senior litigation partner at the firm; you subsequently left Paul, Weiss upon your confirmation as a federal district judge in this Court in August 1994. As a result, the length of our overlap at Paul, Weiss was less than two years. During that relatively brief period more than thirty years ago, I do remember the Paul, Weiss partners with whom I worked and none of them was Your Honor. More specifically, I have no recollection from that time period of ever interacting with Your Honor on a case, participating with Your Honor in a client or case-related meeting, or attending a court proceeding with Your Honor. In fact, I remember no direct interaction from that time period with Your Honor at all. This is hardly surprising since at that time, I was a very junior associate at a large New York law firm and Your Honor was one of the leaders of the Paul, Weiss litigation department. And, as Your Honor well knows, our substantive interactions over the last three decades have been limited to your courtroom in the two cases filed by our client E. Jean Carroll against Donald Trump and in a case in which I represented Columbia University.

Needless to say, at no point have we ever had a “‘mentor’ type relationship,” as alleged by Ms. Habba. ECF 281 at 1. downloaded.

There is more, but this is the relevant portion.
The filing is a pdf but if interested, can be dowloaded here

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

I don't recall asking you for anything.....unless you have changed your name to ND?


But, I also fail to see how talking about sexual abuse is off topic of sexual abuse....



BTW, you can knock it off with the personal attacks when I wasn't talking to you in the first place bub

You are off topic, this thread is about men, specifically Trump, found liable for sexual assault and defamation, why can't you stay on topic in any thread?

when you become a moderator, you can take action. Until then, STFU and use the alert button and make your case.

lol Still can't accept reality - Trump liable and Carroll wins all cases and is not a liar.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: quintessentone

I was responding to another member, not you, get bent


BTW, the topic of the thread, as per the title, is "words are worth13x than sexual abuse". Get a clew bud

Go find someone else to be love struck by

Projection PorkChop, it's obvious.

a reply to: frogs453

It appears they can't grasp at that straw.

a reply to: quintessentone

I forgot to add she states she reserved the rights to seek sanctions against Habba for false accusations.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: quintessentone

I forgot to add she states she reserved the rights to seek sanctions against Habba for false accusations.

if she's lying, she should be punished. If not, should she also be punished?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: quintessentone

I forgot to add she states she reserved the rights to seek sanctions against Habba for false accusations.

Just look at Habba's wording:

"In that regard, it is telling that the article in the New York Post only appeared after Ms. Habba’s own statement to the media last weekend where she claimed that only after trial concluded did she learn that Your Honor and I both previously worked at Paul, Weiss, referring to a 'conflict of interest' that is 'insane and so incestuous,'" the letter notes.

themessenger.com...

Out of the frying pan into the fire.

a reply to: network dude

Any time a court determines there was a provable crime or in this case an incorrect or illegal action, then whoever is in the wrong should face the consequences. I've always been steady on that point.

a reply to: quintessentone

I had a client who asked me to apply for the District Judge to recuse himself because he acted for his ex wife in very acrimonious divorce.

He refused to do so saying he had no Ill will against him nor any bias against him.


After the hearing , the DJ asked me to stay behind for a chat.

"Well" he said "that just shows what sort of a man he is".

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: quintessentone

I had a client who asked me to apply for the District Judge to recuse himself because he acted for his ex wife in very acrimonious divorce.

He refused to do so saying he had no Ill will against him nor any bias against him.


After the hearing , the DJ asked me to stay behind for a chat.

"Well" he said "that just shows what sort of a man he is".

I'm not quite getting it. Who was suppose to harbor the alleged ill will (not enough coffee today maybe)? I would think the client against the lawyer.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: network dude

Any time a court determines there was a provable crime or in this case an incorrect or illegal action, then whoever is in the wrong should face the consequences. I've always been steady on that point.

good, just trying to put a little cement on those goal posts.

a reply to: quintessentone

The Judge against my client. Because when the Judge was in private practice he represented my chaps ex wife in a very bitter divorce which got very nasty so my chap objected to him hearing this case.