Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Nope. I already told you, I'm not going there.

I don't care.

This is about defamation

Defamation can't exist without the rape. You do understand that right?

Of course you don't.


Only one person so far has demonstrated the ability to form an actual opinion that they could articulate. The rest of you look terrible trying to make the leap from allegation to proof.


And I'm having a grand time exposing it.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Did you find that evidence of Trump being at the establishment? Pretty sure that should be an easy feat. I mean you surely want evidence to back up your position, right?

Nope. I already told you, I'm not going there. This is about defamation, not whether or not Trump made it habit of trolling the women's lingerie department at Bergdorf Goodman.

Clearly the famous Trump meets thousands of random people each year.
Surely he can’t be forced to remember every one who photobombed him. Especially someone so unremarkable as that thing.

And another thing about the Bergdorf.
Was she working there at the time or just trolling for rich men to add to her already three digit body count?
She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

a reply to: Vermilion

Bah, you're burying the lead!


See, if that photo is Trump meeting Carroll then him mistaking Carroll for his wife at the time makes for troubling consistency.


But we aren't there yet.

Still waiting for someone to provide any evidence that Trump was at that establishment with Carroll.

Is this not a completely logical place to start?

a reply to: JinMI

Defamation can't exist without the rape. You do understand that right?

LOL. You know she also claimed, in her book, that Les Moonves sexually assaulted her. He's not attacking her and she's not suing him. He did disavow the act.

Vengeful and malicious defamation isn't self-defense.

a reply to: JinMI

Still waiting for someone to provide any evidence that Trump was at that establishment with Carroll.

Is this not a completely logical place to start?

There's no starting here. This is the end. The judge and jury have spoken. All there is left are the dying spasms of the Trump team trying to appeal the amount of the fine.

It's over.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

LOL. You know she also claimed, in her book, that Les Moonves sexually assaulted her. He's not attacking her and she's not suing him.

And? We know you already believe that civil rights are only applicable to people you deem worthy, there's no need to really reinforce the point. But if you insist......

Vengeful and malicious defamation isn't self-defense.

But accusing someone of rape sans any evidence isn't vengeful or malicious?

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Still waiting for someone to provide any evidence that Trump was at that establishment with Carroll.

Is this not a completely logical place to start?

There's no starting here. This is the end. The judge and jury have spoken. All there is left are the dying spasms of the Trump team trying to appeal the amount of the fine.

It's over.

Like Stormy?
Like Avennatti?

You've been such a fantastic sport. I couldn't have done any of this without you.

a reply to: JinMI

My bad.

I was just looking at Bergdorfs. Did you know they have chonies that are $5800 per pair?

a reply to: Vermilion

She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

Why do you think that? She had her own TV Show called "Ask Jean". She was an advice columnist for Elle Magazine and comedy writer for Saturday Night Live. She's exactly the kind of person that would shop there.

a reply to: Vermilion

I couldn't afford to eat fast food in NYC.


I would concede for the sake of argument that she was there.

a reply to: JinMI

But accusing someone of rape sans any evidence isn't vengeful or malicious?

Trump could have sued E Jean. Why didn't he?

Ehrm....There was a blue dress. Trump asserted his 5th Amendment rights, and fought submitting a DNA sample for 5 months. Then, two months AFTER the evidence deadline, AFTER the beginning of the trial, Trump's attorney asked for a delay, so Trump could submit his DNA. It was denied.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

Why do you think that? She had her own TV Show called "Ask Jean". She was an advice columnist for Elle Magazine and comedy writer for Saturday Night Live. She's exactly the kind of person that would shop there.

And her imagination is so creative, she copied a rape story from a Law & Order:SVU episode to falsely accuse Trump.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

Why do you think that? She had her own TV Show called "Ask Jean". She was an advice columnist for Elle Magazine and comedy writer for Saturday Night Live. She's exactly the kind of person that would shop there.

And her imagination is so creative, she copied a rape story from a Law & Order:SVU episode to falsely accuse Trump.

You know, she did tell a few friends about what happened, (and those episodes are pulled from real events)....so.....Maybe the writers got the story from her. She had some friends that appeared on The Apprentice, too. People talk.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Trump could have sued E Jean. Why didn't he?

Why indeed. But why are you ignoring the question. Is accusing someone of rape sans any evidence vengeful or malicious in your estimation?

Trump asserted his 5th Amendment rights, and fought submitting a DNA sample for 5 months. Then, two months AFTER the evidence deadline, AFTER the beginning of the trial, Trump's attorney asked for a delay, so Trump could submit his DNA. It was denied.

So on top of the clear contempt you have for his constitutional right, you're now saying the courts messed up? While also saying the court did right and you stand firmly behind it? Like you did with abortion...........


Can't make this stuff up, but here it is. Tell me more Sookie.

I'm dyin over here!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

Why do you think that? She had her own TV Show called "Ask Jean". She was an advice columnist for Elle Magazine and comedy writer for Saturday Night Live. She's exactly the kind of person that would shop there.

Before she won the rape sweepstakes lottery she was worth 2 million.
She couldn’t afford to buy a lighter for her crackpipe in that store.
After 50 years of being a so called tv star, tv writer, columnist and author she’s only worth 2 mill? No way she shops there.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

Why do you think that? She had her own TV Show called "Ask Jean". She was an advice columnist for Elle Magazine and comedy writer for Saturday Night Live. She's exactly the kind of person that would shop there.

And her imagination is so creative, she copied a rape story from a Law & Order:SVU episode to falsely accuse Trump.

You know, she did tell a few friends about what happened, (and those episodes are pulled from real events)....so.....Maybe the writers got the story from her. She had some friends that appeared on The Apprentice, too. People talk.

This post is awesome 🤣🤣🤣
Truly LoL
You should write for SNL👍

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

Why do you think that? She had her own TV Show called "Ask Jean". She was an advice columnist for Elle Magazine and comedy writer for Saturday Night Live. She's exactly the kind of person that would shop there.

And her imagination is so creative, she copied a rape story from a Law & Order:SVU episode to falsely accuse Trump.

You know, she did tell a few friends about what happened, (and those episodes are pulled from real events)....so.....Maybe the writers got the story from her. She had some friends that appeared on The Apprentice, too. People talk.

Your blind hatred for all things Trump won’t even let you consider the alternative?
That she is lying?

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She certainly couldn’t afford to shop there.

Why do you think that? She had her own TV Show called "Ask Jean". She was an advice columnist for Elle Magazine and comedy writer for Saturday Night Live. She's exactly the kind of person that would shop there.

And her imagination is so creative, she copied a rape story from a Law & Order:SVU episode to falsely accuse Trump.

You know, she did tell a few friends about what happened, (and those episodes are pulled from real events)....so.....Maybe the writers got the story from her. She had some friends that appeared on The Apprentice, too. People talk.

Your blind hatred for all things Trump won’t even let you consider the alternative?
That she is lying?

It's worse than that.

These people can't even put together a few pieces of evidence to suggest that they are correct.


Willful ignorance defined.

a reply to: Vermilion

She couldn’t afford to buy a lighter for her crackpipe in that store.

WOW! You did it! You just proved that Donald Trump is innocent!
/sarc

Keep talking trash. Donald Trump still has to pay somewhere around $90 million to E Jean Carroll for defaming her. It's called justice!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She couldn’t afford to buy a lighter for her crackpipe in that store.

WOW! You did it! You just proved that Donald Trump is innocent!
/sarc

Keep talking trash. Donald Trump still has to pay somewhere around $90 million to E Jean Carroll for defaming her. It's called justice!

You really believe she is going to see any of that money?