Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

She couldn’t afford to buy a lighter for her crackpipe in that store.

WOW! You did it! You just proved that Donald Trump is innocent!
/sarc

Keep talking trash. Donald Trump still has to pay somewhere around $90 million to E Jean Carroll for defaming her. It's called justice!

She can afford that lighter now.👌
Bad news is with her advanced age, high mileage and poor mental and physical health she’ll be lucky to ever see a dime.
Money has nothing to do with this though. They could have fined him a dollar and it’s the same BS clown show.
Due process is all but gone in this country.
They’re not even trying to hide it anymore.
This whole case should have never even made it to court.

a reply to: Vermilion

Due process is all but gone in this country.
They’re not even trying to hide it anymore.
This whole case should have never even made it to court.

Waaa! Trump is being held accountable!





It's BEDLAM I tell ya! Complete Bedlam!

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

Due process is all but gone in this country.
They’re not even trying to hide it anymore.
This whole case should have never even made it to court.

Waaa! Trump is being held accountable!

It's BEDLAM I tell ya! Complete Bedlam!

Those your Liberal brainwashed kids?

a reply to: RazorV66

I have. She could be lying, It could be a money grab. "Me too!" But when i think about this, if it walks like a duck and grabs p***y like a duck, there might be a running pattern of quacking.

Wouldn't be a shock to learn Trump can't keep his d*ck in his pants. Or had a laundry list of hush money to pay. Or inspired Law and Order episodes from the get-go.

The Wolf of Wall Street wasn't just Scorsese trying to skirt an NC-17 rating, that really is The 80s capitalist world Trump is from. The private jet/sex island crowd, whether people will ascribe that to Trump or not.

The privileges of being rich; trophies, mistresses, affairs, and bastard children kept silent. Aristocratic culture (especially the business one) is a somewhat rapey cacophony of infidels anyway.

I base Trumps relationship qualities on Melinas ability to play his "wife". Often I think, "Wow! She doesn't even want to hold his hand. There are miserable show wives that are willing to play, and some that don't even want to try."

It all paints a picture of pretty much any allegations fitting the profile.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: RazorV66

I have. She could be lying, It could be a money grab. "Me too!" But when i think about this, if it walks like a duck and grabs p***y like a duck, there might be a running pattern of quacking.

Wouldn't be a shock to learn Trump can't keep his d*ck in his pants. Or had a laundry list of hush money to pay. Or inspired Law and Order episodes from the get-go.

The Wolf of Wall Street wasn't just Scorsese trying to skirt an NC-17 rating, that really is The 80s capitalist world Trump is from. The private jet/sex island crowd, whether people will ascribe that to Trump or not.

The privileges of being rich, trophies, mistresses, affairs, and bastard children kept silent. Aristocratic culture (especially the business one) is a somewhat rapey cacophony of infidels.

I base Trumps relationship qualities on Melinas ability to play his "wife". Often think, "Wow! She doesn't even want to hold his hand. The miserable show wives that are willing to play, and some that don't even want to try."

It all paints a picture of pretty much any allegations fitting the profile.

Pure speculation.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Vermilion

Due process is all but gone in this country.
They’re not even trying to hide it anymore.
This whole case should have never even made it to court.

Waaa! Trump is being held accountable!

I haven't really seen Donald Trump held accountable for anything just yet.... he could even be the next president of the USA.

Just a lot of political maneuvering at this point.

One side will eventually win I'm sure.

a reply to: Degradation33

It's one thing to think of a person in a certain light.

It's another to go through the legal process. Evidence matters.


Would you agree?

a reply to: Degradation33

Sure buddy.

Trump, probably one of the only rich guys in the 80’s who wasn’t running around with coke boogers in his nose, having 4 martini lunches before hitting the strip clubs and making it rain. He was busy making billions and that’s what it takes to make that kind of money.
You know why?
He’s doesn’t do drugs, doesn’t drink and isn’t peeing on any hookers.

Don’t forget, it wasn’t that long ago when the dems absolutely adored him.
So no, your story doesn’t add up.

originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: Degradation33

Sure buddy.

Trump, probably one of the only rich guys in the 80’s who wasn’t running around with coke boogers in his nose, having 4 martini lunches before hitting the strip clubs and making it rain. He was busy making billions and that’s what it takes to make that kind of money.
You know why?
He’s doesn’t do drugs, doesn’t drink and isn’t peeing on any hookers.

Don’t forget, it wasn’t that long ago when the dems absolutely adored him.
So no, your story doesn’t add up.

So, does this excuse the assault and the defamation guilty verdicts?

originally posted by: EndTime

originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: Degradation33

Sure buddy.

Trump, probably one of the only rich guys in the 80’s who wasn’t running around with coke boogers in his nose, having 4 martini lunches before hitting the strip clubs and making it rain. He was busy making billions and that’s what it takes to make that kind of money.
You know why?
He’s doesn’t do drugs, doesn’t drink and isn’t peeing on any hookers.

Don’t forget, it wasn’t that long ago when the dems absolutely adored him.
So no, your story doesn’t add up.

So, does this excuse the assault and the defamation guilty verdicts?

What?

a reply to: Vermilion

He’s doesn’t do drugs, doesn’t drink and isn’t peeing on any hookers. Don’t forget, it wasn’t that long ago when the dems absolutely adored him. So no, your story doesn’t add up.

And this is why he has to be stopped.

He is beholden to no one . He isn't easily Blackmailed , He's not on Epstein's Island .

It's nut's that these Leftist Sheep are constantly going for Trumps Throat , They are doing the will of their masters and have no idea.

Why are some so blind ? I was once a Democrat myself , But I saw how the Left lost their minds over Obama and then when Trump came down that escalator it was full Retard mode for the Left.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

You can still hate Trump while also wanting the law to work and see justice done.

It's completely OK.

Turns out, that's not what we see transpiring however.

a reply to: JinMI

I havent followed the particulars of any of his allegations too closely, but I know the situation, and my mind is made up on the plausibility of all 18 accusers, not just this one, having a case. Not likely, but within the realm of possibility. He is kinda known for it.

If he didn't fit the character profile, he wouldn't lose civil cases like OJ.

"Liability for sexual assault means that the jury has concluded that the plaintiff has satisfied the preponderance of the evidence standard and that the defendant must pay damages to compensate the victim. There are no criminal consequences to a finding of liability."

In my mind it's like saying, "we believe you, but you're a rape kit short of criminal charges," or "Yeah, you had reasonable doubt, but that was just the technicality that got you off, and that isn't good enough here."

For Trump, it absolutely is something to point out liable ≠ guilt of criminal charges, but still doesn't help him prove he isn't at least 51% liable time and again, which is not a confirmation, but almost always a suggestion of guilt.

a reply to: Degradation33

There is still the matter of evidence.

What should concern you even more, as it applies to Trump, finding 51% of fault for anything is highly likely. That's a problem legally speaking as it speaks directly to fair trials.

a reply to: JinMI

And yet they did in the case Jean Carroll, both sexual assault and defamation charges. They found 51% of fault on both.

A judge ruled before the trial Mr Trump had defamed her by calling her sexual assault accusation against him a lie.

He was found liable last year for sexual abuse of Ms Carroll in the 1990s. Jurors rejected her rape claim.

He was first 51% responsible for her sexual assault and then 51% responsible for calling it a lie.

It's like getting Biden on a game of Memory.

I think it speaks more directly to Trump not possessing the character or respect for women necessary to counter these claims, more than a judiciary rigged against him.

As evidence by the tone against her legitimacy, Trump denying something he was held liable for, can turn her into a pariah at the drop of a tweet.

If Donnie has never been a perpetrator of sexual assault I'm The Duchess of Cadbury, and I have dominion over a commonwealth of chocolate rabbits that lay cream cream-filled eggs.

It's also hard to prove a rape in the 90s in 2022.

Will there be liars? Absolutely.

But this liar was deemed to be 51% the victim of sexual assault.

Blame the 2022 Adult Surivivors Act, which tossed out the statute of limitations for felony rape, leading to these charges to be filed long after that window had closed.

She did it within minutes, citing fears of retaliation had prevented her until then, and maybe she saw an opportunity and blood in the water. I just can't not give her the benefit of doubt, and the jury did as well.

Trump can't shut his mouth or also not need the last word (or righteous position) at all costs, that's also not helping him deny things where restraint is concerned.

a reply to: Degradation33

That’s a giant egg you laid there.
Impressive.

a reply to: Degradation33


Yea....still missing that evidence part.


We can wax and wane all day long on good, bad or ill character, assumptions, colors of law and loopholes.

At some point, we're going to need to address the evidence, or the lack of it in this case.

But you wrapped up with exactly the thought I believe to be true.

This is to shut him up, nothing more.

a reply to: Vermilion

* A 51% liable egg.

Call it whatever the hell you want, call it bias, I'm just thinking you don't rack up 50 years of sexual assault allegations, mostly demeaning, sexist grab-ass sh*t, without 50 years of being a sexist and demeaning grab-ass.

a reply to: IgorMartinez

This is just sad man. You can't point to a single piece of evidence at all. No supporting testimony, no physical evidence, nothing. Instead you're falling back on a position of "she accused him and a jury found him liable, therefore it's legit."

First and foremost, juries aren't infallible. Especially when they are presented with a person like Trump.

Second, which part of her testimony did you find convincing? Was it the part where she claimed she still had the dress she wore, then when she presented it, it wasn't even designed for nearly another decade after that? Or maybe it was the part where she changed her story from rape to assault? Or maybe you found the part where she said she's a huge law and order fan and her story is a near exact replica of an episode, to be very compelling.

Idk, maybe there is something else you found very moving about her story.

"%^& "$ $%^&* ~@:%"
dont bane me!

Try being rape't and then verbely bullied.
and see witch one realy hurts the most.
and YEARS later see witch one you remember in Detail !