Words are worth 13x more than sexual abuse

a reply to: JinMI

"Again, yet you yourself don't even believe the allegations of rape. Which was what this is all built on. So, if the rape allegation is false, then there can not be defamation in the context of Trump defending himself."

Hello?

The jury dismissed the rape allegation.

The trial was about other stuff.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Yes, circular is your logic being applied. Again, my question to you:

Yes, Carp, we've heard from the jury.

I want to hear from you and others that agree.

Where's that context I'm missing?

Where is that source or quote that convinced you that the jury made the correct decision?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The jury dismissed the rape allegation.

You understand that Carrolls article is what prompted Trump to defend himself right.

From there is where the defamation claims came.

Don't tell me you don't even have a bare bones grasp of the timeline.....

a reply to: JinMI

I and others have answered you.

a reply to: JinMI

I have provided timelines....these people just want to say Trump bad. At the end of the day that is all it is. At the same time, call us ignorant because we can see when things are railroaded for political gain.

I am sure the other case will come down this week for another huge sum money.....

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

I and others have answered you.

No, you've not.

You've deferred to the jury as your basis while also not citing what convinced yourselves.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: JinMI

I have provided timelines....these people just want to say Trump bad. At the end of the day that is all it is. At the same time, call us ignorant because we can see when things are railroaded for political gain.

I am sure the other case will come down this week for another huge sum money.....

Pretty much.

I didn't think asking folks for their own thoughts and opinions would become a tooth pulling exercise.

a reply to: JinMI

Perhaps you should conduct his Appeal?

God knows, he's running out of lawyers.

I'm sure he'd be grateful for your sage legal advice.

No doubt, you'd do it pro bono?

Out of love?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

Perhaps you should conduct his Appeal?

God knows, he's running out of lawyers.

I'm sure he'd be grateful for your sage legal advice.

No doubt, you'd do it pro bono?

Out of love?

Can you please answer my question to the point of the topic?

I want to hear from you and others that agree.

Where's that context I'm missing?

Where is that source or quote that convinced you that the jury made the correct decision?

a reply to: JinMI

What"context"?

The jury made their decision. If you don't like it, the onus is on you, not me.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Only if you are trying to dodge the question.


Why are you dodging the question? Could it be because you have neither the intrest or capacity to form your own opinion?

a reply to: JinMI

If Trump had of just let his lawyers deal with this claim from the start and not gone off on a rant personally attacking his accuser, would he now be liable to pay E. Jean Carroll 83 million dollars?

It’s a yes or no question.

a reply to: JinMI

Where's that context I'm missing?

The malice part.
If Trump was merely defending himself from an account in book, from some lady he didn't even know, like he said, there would be no need to drag E Jean Carroll's reputation through the mud. He could have simple denied it, and waved it off as just another wannabe look for 15 minutes of fame. But no....Trump has to punch down and push Carrolls face in the mud!

Almost $90 Million and counting! Keep talk Donnie, keep talking! LOL

a reply to: Sookiechacha

She alleged that Trump raped her.



Turns out, that didn't happen.

So, how come you aren't furious that she's making false claims and further hurting actual rape victims Sookie?

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: JinMI

If Trump had of just let his lawyers deal with this claim from the start and not gone off on a rant personally attacking his accuser, would he now be liable to pay E. Jean Carroll 83 million dollars?

It’s a yes or no question.

If she wouldn't have alleged that he raped her, none of this would have happened.

Why is this so difficult for you.

Even the much better formed arguments are way past this.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

Where's that context I'm missing?

Almost $90 Million and counting! Keep talk Donnie, keep talking! LOL

. . . and he is.

He just can't help himself.

a reply to: JinMI

If she wouldn't have alleged that he raped her, none of this would have happened.

Why is this so difficult for you.

Stupid woman! Look what she made Trump do! LOL

a reply to: JinMI

Please don't lecture me about not answering questions.

I have answered them.

As have others.

You don't like the answers.

Cry about it.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

If she wouldn't have alleged that he raped her, none of this would have happened.

Why is this so difficult for you.

Stupid woman! Look she made Trump do! LOL

Defend himself...with words.

The horror.


You of all people should be irate at Carroll.


If consistency mattered to you that is.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: JinMI

Please don't lecture me about not answering questions.

I have answered them.

As have others.

You don't like the answers.

Cry about it.

No, no one has.

Deflect and defer, absolutely.