Judge rules Trump has to stay quiet and not defend himself in court - Carroll Case

They’re not even pretending anymore by picking somebody sane to accuse their enemy. Any degenerate sociopath who has no shame and can lie with a straight face will do.

She’s being backed financially by billionaire and Democrat mega-donor Reid Hoffman.
Yes, the same Reid Hoffman who was bff’s with pedo trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

What a freaking disgusting hitjob.
All of you with TDS who are cheering for this political sideshow miscarriage of justice beware, this can easily happen to you as well.
One well backed accuser and you’re toast.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Where you there?

a reply to: matafuchs

I was following multiple reporters that were present. All of them reported it.

a reply to: Threadbarer

...and they provided audio recordings for you? I mean, you asked me where I got the video right?

Donald Trump's verbal outbursts during the writer E. Jean Carroll's emotional testimony about threats of death and rape she received prompted a judge to warn the former president that he could be kicked out of the courtroom.

Link

I mean, this is written like the intro to a novel. So, the opposing lawyer decided to chime in during a break and say the jury could hear him...so...why not bring it up while it is happening?

Carroll took the witness stand Wednesday morning. During a break in testimony, her attorney Shawn Crowley complained to the judge that Trump was making audible comments that the jury could hear. Later on, Crowley said Trump continued to comment on Carroll's testimony despite Kaplan's warnings to remain quiet. She said she heard Trump remark, "It is a witch hunt, and it really is a con job."

And, How did a lawyer know the jury could hear his comments?

Further, so the judge decided to continue to interrupt during cross....

Carroll's cross-examination by Trump attorney Alina Habba was repeatedly interrupted as Kaplan admonished her for improper courtroom procedures, at one point telling her, "Refresh your memory about how it is you get a document into evidence.

and Carrol can do no harm...I mean....why would she delete a threat?

Late in the day, Carroll acknowledged that she may have deleted some of the threats she received via email. Habba quickly asked for a mistrial, saying Carroll may have violated a subpoena by doing so. Even more quickly, the request was denied.

This is not about Trump. This is about what the courts could do to anyone.....

I'll leave this gem also.....

Trump Accuser E. Jean Carroll Backed by Epstein Island Visitor Reid Hoffman

originally posted by: Vermilion

They’re not even pretending anymore by picking somebody sane to accuse their enemy. Any degenerate sociopath who has no shame and can lie with a straight face will do.

She’s being backed financially by billionaire and Democrat mega-donor Reid Hoffman.
Yes, the same Reid Hoffman who was bff’s with pedo trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

What a freaking disgusting hitjob.
All of you with TDS who are cheering for this political sideshow miscarriage of justice beware, this can easily happen to you as well.
One well backed accuser and you’re toast.

If Donald Trump is innocent, he should adopt the Clinton method for teaching others not to try and emulate liar E. Carroll. "You don't phuck with a Trump", should be the lesson to gold-diggers.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: opethPA

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: opethPA

As usual, you're on top of things.

Tell me this. I've just read a summary of today's court proceedings.

HERE: news.yahoo.com...

WHAT HAS PRESIDENT TRUMP DONE WRONG TO THIS WOMAN BEYOND A SEXUAL THING in the 1990's?

It's got to be more than "hurt her feelings".

I just want to go over this sentence.

"WHAT HAS PRESIDENT TRUMP DONE WRONG TO THIS WOMAN BEYOND A SEXUAL THING in the 1990's?"

To be clear, in your mind it is okay that any POTUS just did a SEXUAL THING to someone all the way back in the 90's?

EIGHT...8 women signed a sworn affidavit that Joe Biden sexually assaulted them. Little girls too.

I BELIEVE THEM...Everybody does!: www.businessinsider.com...

It's NOT OK!

What does that have to do with your quote on Trump just doing a sexual thing to her?


To be clear, based on avail info i believe that Biden has crossed the line when it comes to Women just like I believe Trump has. I have always said Biden and Trump both suck so just looking for logic on why you can't just relay the truth.

1. Where in your source does it say 8 women signed a sworn affidavit that Joe Biden assaulted them.

The closest your article says is the following, "

"

Eight women have alleged that Biden either touched them inappropriately or violated their personal space in ways that made them uncomfortable.

www.businessinsider.com...

Maybe if I search on " 8 women signed ... " nope that doesn't give me any results

Hopefully you can linke me some of those affidavits so I can read them..

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: WeMustCare

"or violated their personal space in ways that made them uncomfortable."

What does that even mean?

Hey Carp , Remember that Time I went to the Restroom in that Bar and you walked in and Sat Down on my Seat were I hung my Coat and had a Pack of Cigs and a Bottle of Heineken in front of it Next to my Girlfriend and She told you that Seat was taken but you sat in it Anyway ? Well , that made me Uncomfortable AND Pissed ! ..........*)

a reply to: Threadbarer

Ah , this is the Mentally Challenged Women that a Jury Believed was Sexually Molested by Mr. Trump ? Seriously > ?

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Threadbarer

Ah , this is the Mentally Challenged Women that a Jury Believed was Sexually Molested by Mr. Trump ? Seriously > ?

She sounds exactly like Pelosi, smashed drunk all the time.
And you know she is a card carrying, whacked Liberal when she freaking dyes the fur on her dog’s head blue.

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

My apologies. How many hundreds of thousands in damages might you accept for the terrible trauma that you must have suffered?

and when does a judge become a lawyer and continue to interrupt proceedings?

Link

A judge should be impartial. I wonder how many times he interrupted the prosecution. My guess is zero.

and I found it in another article...

Habba grilled Carroll during cross-examination on why she deleted messages with death threats. Carroll said she did so because she did not know how to deal with them. Habba asked the judge for a mistrial on that matter, but was denied. Kaplan also scolded Habba for reading a transcript of a deposition that she had not provided to him.

Habba found the section of the document and provided it to the court clerk. ‘We are going to do it my way in the courtroom, and that is all there is to it,’ the judge said in a raised voice.

Link

a reply to: matafuchs

From your link:

""Notably, Federal Judge Lewis Kaplan ripped into Habba repeatedly for attempting break the rules and asking E. Jean Carroll questions about things that had not been entered into evidence. At times, it not only appeared that Habba had never tried a case in her entire life, but also seemed like she forgot to attend class entirely while in law school."

Judges do tend to insist that things like rules of evidence must be followed.

If you repeatedly try to flout them, the Judge is gonna get tetchy.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Two separate recesses had to be called so the judge could instruct Habba on basic trial procedures. She didn't know how to impeach a witness and she didn't know how to enter evidence.

Things aren't going much better for her today.

Habba isn't a trial lawyer. It's not the kind of law she practiced before Trump hired her. By all accounts she's a very good paper lawyer. But that clearly doesn't translate to being a good trial lawyer.

Trump would've been better served by keeping Tacopina on as lead counsel for the case.

a reply to: Threadbarer

If Carol's feelings are hurt that badly, Donald Trump should have just settled out of court.

a reply to: matafuchs

"when does a judge become a lawyer and continue to interrupt proceedings?"

It's kind of what they do?

a reply to: WeMustCare

It certainly would've been a cheaper option for him. The actions of him and Habba have done nothing to ingratiate him to the jury that will decide punitive damages.

Ted Boutrous, one of the premier litigators in the country, has speculated Trump could be on the hook for as much as $100 million.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Ted Boutrous, one of the premier litigators in the country, has speculated Trump could be on the hook for as much as $100 million.

a reply to: matafuchs

"I wonder how many times he interrupted the prosecution. My guess is zero."

Maybe, because they gave him no reason to do so because they knew and followed the rules?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Then why does one article say she did it incorrectly and others state she didn't. I am not hear to argue legal proceedings I am talking about how it is reported.