It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Annee
Yes. Only woke capitalists in the uber-woke state of Texas are making things harder for good citizens by using cheap illegal slave labor
This country makes me tired
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Annee
Yes. Only woke capitalists in the uber-woke state of Texas are making things harder for good citizens by using cheap illegal slave labor
This country makes me tired
originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: Lazy88
I don't actually believe you have family in Texas
🙂
Biden administration ends mass worksite immigration raids
By Priscilla Alvarez, CNN
Updated 1:43 PM EDT, Tue October 12, 2021
amp.cnn.com...
Justice Department sues Texas over law that would let police arrest migrants who enter US illegally
PAUL J. WEBER and ACACIA CORONADO, Associated Press
www.rochesterfirst.com... p/
Biden Dismantles the Ban on Hiring Illegal Immigrants
cis.org...
The memo’s exclusive focus on “exploitative employers” ignores the fact that the majority of illegal-alien workers are employed on the books (with fake or stolen Social Security numbers), paid above the minimum wage, and work in conditions no different from their citizen and legal-immigrant co-workers.
The distortion of the labor market caused by the ongoing inflow of illegal workers is a function of their number, not lurid exploitative practices that a relatively small share experience. This ongoing labor-supply shock holds down wages and reduces incentives to recruit and train American workers and invest in labor-saving, productivity-increasing technologies.
Kise termed the restrictions “very unfair.” “You are not allowing President Trump, who has been wrongfully demeaned and belittled by an out of control, politically motivated attorney general, to speak about the things that must be spoken about,” the attorney wrote.
“I won’t debate this yet again. Take it or leave it," the judge shot back, with an all-caps addition saying he wouldn't push back an already extended and imminent deadline to resolve the matter. The deadline passed without a response from Trump's lawyers.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Dandandat3
The timing is interesting but not for the reason you want to imply.
Martin Shkreli was recently barred from operating any kind of business in the state of New York. Just this week James' office submitted a filing pointing to that as a precedence.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Irishhaf
They're both 63-12 cases.
It's apples to apples.
But an Associated Press analysis of nearly 70 years of similar cases showed Trump’s case stands apart: It’s the only big business found that was threatened with a shutdown without a showing of obvious victims and major losses. Some legal experts worry if the New York judge goes ahead with such a penalty in a final ruling expected within the next couple of weeks, it could make it easier for courts to wipe out companies in the future.“This sets a horrible precedent,” said Adam Leitman Bailey, a New York real estate lawyer who once sued a Trump condo building.
In fact, the bank made its own estimates of Trump’s personal wealth, at times lopping billions from Trump’s figures, and still decided to lend to him. And bank officials called to testify couldn’t say for sure if Trump’s personal statement of worth had any impact on the rates.