Colorado Supreme Court Bans Trump from the 2024 Presidential Ballot.

This is kind of a big deal.
I wonder why this hasn’t leaked yet.
Do you think they caught the last person(s) who leaked?

originally posted by: Lazy88
a reply to: WingDingLuey

I’m sure Trump can be kicked off the ballot, but there is no just cause to do so. Which is another argument.

Ah , NO he can't .

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Good chance this ruling drops tomorrow. SCOTUS has announced they will be posting opinions tomorrow which is very rare for a Monday.

YES for Tomorrow: www.thegatewaypundit.com...

As I recall, most opinions are released on MONDAYS.

originally posted by: Vermilion

This is kind of a big deal.
I wonder why this hasn’t leaked yet.
Do you think they caught the last person(s) who leaked?

The really big opinion will come in JUNE, when the Supreme Court announces if former Presidents are immune from being prosecuted for crimes they may have committed while serving as U.S. President.

originally posted by: Vermilion


Do you think they caught the last person(s) who leaked?

There were 16 people who could have leaked the ROE vs WADE decision. Too many for the Supreme Court police to interrogate. And (maybe the real reason), they are all cream-of-the-crop understudies of the Justices.

a reply to: CataclysmicRockets

Opinion is up.

a reply to: JinMI

As expected. The liberal justices' concurring opinion leading with a line from the Dobbs ruling was a nice touch.

a reply to: Threadbarer

It comes as little surprise that virtue signaling would be appropriate and heralded by you.


/shrug.

a reply to: JinMI

Oh my!

Does this mean people can vote for whom they want?

What sort of madness is this!

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

As expected. The liberal justices' concurring opinion leading with a line from the Dobbs ruling was a nice touch.

As expected?

I’ve seen many insane Liberals on X that were hanging their hats on the SC kicking Trump off every ballot left.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I just want to know what recourse does Trump have for all this judicial lawfare and the cost of such.

originally posted by: JinMI
Opinion is up.

9-0
And they explain it very well.
Even the keyboard lawyers here should be able to understand it.

originally posted by: JinMI
I just want to know what recourse does Trump have for all this judicial lawfare and the cost of such.

I was wondering the same.
Can he sue the idiots who caused him to have to defend himself?
It was obviously a frivolous lawsuit against him.

a reply to: RazorV66

Then they didn't listen to the oral arguments. It was very clear which way SCOTUS was leaning.

We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal of- fices, especially the Presidency.

From Barrett

For present purposes, our differences are far less important than our unanimity: All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home.

The others, to be honest, are not worth it. They do not agree with their feels but now the law has been enforce correctly.

As stated we are a Federalist state based on our Constitution.

a reply to: FlyersFan

He should be able to sue the states and individuals. Why not? We have all learned you do not even need evidence anymore in a civil trial...

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: RazorV66

Then they didn't listen to the oral arguments. It was very clear which way SCOTUS was leaning.

Quite sure they didn’t.

The only listened to their colossal hurt feelz like usual.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: JinMI

As expected. The liberal justices' concurring opinion leading with a line from the Dobbs ruling was a nice touch.

This must be a Major Blow to those in the Gay Community .

So under 14th amendment s3 it's up to Congress?

Didn't it vote in 2021 that there was incitement to insurrection?

Already?

Could get interesting but others on here are more knowledgeable about such things than this Brit.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

So under 14th amendment s3 it's up to Congress?

Yes, as is prescribed in sec 5 of the 14th amendment.

Didn't it vote in 2021 that there was incitement to insurrection?

If you are referring to the impeachment, no. They voted that the allegations were agreed upon by a majority.