It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IndieA
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: IndieA
My guess is that, because these people have never been charged with anything in relation to the case, that none of them has done anything wrong.
And I'd also guess that the only reason that the names were suppressed was to protect the innocent from people who would make baseless and false allegations against them - like Gateway Pundit are implying that they will do.
It's a big nothingburger, again.
From a security standpoint, I would think that any association with Epstein would be an automatic disqualifier from sensitive positions, as the chance of blackmail existing increases just by association.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: IndieA
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: IndieA
My guess is that, because these people have never been charged with anything in relation to the case, that none of them has done anything wrong.
And I'd also guess that the only reason that the names were suppressed was to protect the innocent from people who would make baseless and false allegations against them - like Gateway Pundit are implying that they will do.
It's a big nothingburger, again.
From a security standpoint, I would think that any association with Epstein would be an automatic disqualifier from sensitive positions, as the chance of blackmail existing increases just by association.
Has it not occurred to you that some of the people on this list were witnesses for the prosecution?
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: IndieA
I don't know how complete this is. But someone released the black book unredacted on twitter in 2019.
twitter.com...
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: IndieA
I think Kamala Harris asked the judge to keep her name sealed, using "fear of violence" as her reasoning.
I think that you just made that up.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: IndieA
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: IndieA
My guess is that, because these people have never been charged with anything in relation to the case, that none of them has done anything wrong.
And I'd also guess that the only reason that the names were suppressed was to protect the innocent from people who would make baseless and false allegations against them - like Gateway Pundit are implying that they will do.
It's a big nothingburger, again.
From a security standpoint, I would think that any association with Epstein would be an automatic disqualifier from sensitive positions, as the chance of blackmail existing increases just by association.
Has it not occurred to you that some of the people on this list were witnesses for the prosecution?
originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
I would think that a proper deadman-switch along with $400 million should be enough to have kept him comfortably alive and hidden somewhere.
And after all, whatever Epstein collected, it never leaked.
It never leaked because they Deaded his ass.
My guess is that, because these people have never been charged with anything in relation to the case, that none of them has done anything wrong.
originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
It never leaked because they Deaded his ass.
I find it hard to believe that alleged blackmail material of that caliper would just go away with the death of one operative.
rince Andrew & paedophile Jeffrey Epstein were close friends for 12 years. Dispatches compared Epstein's flight logs & address book with Andrew's schedule and found that over their years of friendship the pair met at least 10 times. The Prince often stayed with Epstein for days.
originally posted by: kwaka
One version of the flight log saved:
archive.org/details/flightlogsandblackbook
At the time it first dropped, there where some photographed versions of the documents going around with lot of names on them. In time some of the lists got shorter. For those that have all the data, including the undergrounds video library, looks like a big job.
I don't know how accurate all the data is in the file I linked too? If the courts do drop it it is going to raise suspicions for those involved and how much? For those on the WEF/WHO bandwagon might make things a bit shaky?