50yo man identifies as female, granted access to little girls' locker room and swim competition

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
Because in my case it was a woman and she was also just "minding her business" and being "a family friend".

Your clumsy virtue signalling aside, you, like the vast majority of those of us who have suffered some form of abuse in our lifetimes, were preyed upon by someone close to your family, who held a position of trust NOT a total stranger in a public changing room with your mother stood beside you surrounded by other girls and their mothers.

Seems to me that all those stood around gawping, pointing and getting their knickers in a right twist are the perverts who couldn't keep their eyes to themselves.

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis
So if you have this knowledge then why are you wanting to create MORE situations where minors are endangered?

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
So if you have this knowledge then why are you wanting to create MORE situations where minors are endangered?

That makes zero sense.

You'll need to elucidate.

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

If you claim that so many of us went through sexual harassment or flat out rape, and acknowledge the dangers of it, why are you arguing for creating even more situations where this will happen?

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

Who is arguing for what now?

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

How I see it: You and Annee are acting like a grown up 50 year old man dressing as a women, competing in girls swimming and insisting to be present when they change their clothes is not a big deal.

Yet it is.

If that individual had any common sense and was sincere about it's motives, it would wait until the girls have changed and not insist to be present during that.

Since when are feelings over a confused mind counting more than protecting children? Benefit of the doubt for the children, AGAINST the creep that wants to watch them undress.

Every sane mind understands this. Why am I even arguing with you. Too shallow, too blind, too spoiled and too entitled you are.

a reply to: Annee

The problem is 50 year old MEN that just randomly decide to "identify" as a women and then conveniently want to compete against teenage, or younger, girls and be in their locker room.

The simple fact that these girls had to build a tent out of towels to protect themselves from this man, in a WOMENS locker room is absolutely ridiculous.

If this dude feels good about himself trying to win against teenagers, he definitely has something F'ed up in his head.

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
Every sane mind understands this. Why am I even arguing with you. Too shallow, too blind, too spoiled and too entitled you are.

Of course, I must be because I don't agree with you.

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

No, it must be because what you propose is insane and puts children at risk.

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
No, it must be because what you propose is insane and puts children at risk.

Quite the opposite actually. Pedophiles depend upon being able to hide behind so-called traditional values.

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

Quite the opposite actually. Pedophiles depend upon being able to hide behind so-called traditional values.

Yeah, so just let us invite them to children's locker rooms and talk down on everyone raising concerns.

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
Yeah, so just let us invite them to children's locker rooms and talk down on everyone raising concerns.

"Them"? This person who you are erroneously accusing of being a pedophile?

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

Accusing?

What business does a 50 year old MAN have competing with teenagers and younger girls down to 8 years old? Let alone being in a women's locker room with them to change and whatever else.

a reply to: PorkChop96

Because the organisers allow it, it is an open competition and those were the only facilities available to them - as the article explained.

The Police were called and declared nothing to see here.

I believe accusing people of pedophilia without basis would be considered defamation. [snip]

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

Them = grown up adults no matter if born male of female, having the questionable urge to be present in children locker rooms.

Also, waiting for your evidence where I specifically said that the pervert this thread is about, is a pedophile.

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
Them = grown up adults no matter if born male of female, having the questionable urge to be present in children locker rooms.

So you're just batting from total ignorance then. Thought so.

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

Then the organizers are just as bad as this dude. 50 year old dudes and young girls NEVER mix. Take the swimming competition out of the equation and what do we have?

He is doing it to himself, no defamation to be done.

[snip]

a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

You repeating that ignorance nonsense, does not make it true. Just saying.

So to wrap it up, you give a # about protecting children, you rather protect the feelz of a grown up adult.

Classy.

originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis

You repeating that ignorance nonsense, does not make it true. Just saying.

So to wrap it up, you give a # about protecting children, you rather protect the feelz of a grown up adult.

Classy.

And you've still got nothing to back up your baseless prejudice. You're seemingly happy for the gutter press to push your buttons, so the pedophiles can hide in your church or scout group, or your family home because they look normal and act just the same as you? Pedophiles don't advertise their difference like this transgender woman did. The pedophile sits right next to you, points and exclaims alongside you and befriends you over such commonality.

nvm