It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We've been over this, you and me. It's a dead end for you. And, Congress hasn't even tried to bring that in as an excuse for an impeachment inquiry.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy
So, I'll ask again:
What foreign policy?
What money?
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy
Explain why the Obama administration would open their own investigation into Zlochevsky if they were trying to protect Burisma.
Were any other wives of Russian mayors included on the sanction list?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
You're moving the goal posts. The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden isn't about the US fidelity to Ukraine, or how congressional war hawks, like Mitch McConnel and Lindsey Graham got us here.
It's about Hunter Biden, but nobody can really say why.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy
Zlochevsky is the CEO of Burisma. What corruption is he uncovering on the US?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
You're moving the goal posts. The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden isn't about the US fidelity to Ukraine, or how congressional war hawks, like Mitch McConnel and Lindsey Graham got us here.
It's about Hunter Biden, but nobody can really say why.
That's because you leftists are trying to blur and obfuscate the issue.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI
You're moving the goal posts. The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden isn't about the US fidelity to Ukraine, or how congressional war hawks, like Mitch McConnel and Lindsey Graham got us here.
It's about Hunter Biden, but nobody can really say why.
That's because you leftists are trying to blur and obfuscate the issue.
See, the bad news for you guys is, influence peddling isn't illegal.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: hangedman13
He was also spending money as fast as it was coming in. By 2019, Hunter has pretty much hit rock bottom.
originally posted by: WingDingLuey
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude
The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?
I'm going with Hunter on this.
There must be a reason he insists on this being public.
No. He's deliberately avoiding the classified material in the closed depositions. 😀
Hunter is not a victim, he is a predator. 😀
The Public hearings come after the closed 😀
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: WingDingLuey
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude
The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?
I'm going with Hunter on this.
There must be a reason he insists on this being public.
No. He's deliberately avoiding the classified material in the closed depositions. 😀
Hunter is not a victim, he is a predator. 😀
The Public hearings come after the closed 😀
Honestly, I have no interest in Hunter Biden.
Just stating how it seems.