It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hunter defies house subpoena

page: 6
13
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

So, I'll ask again:

What foreign policy?
What money?



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha




We've been over this, you and me. It's a dead end for you. And, Congress hasn't even tried to bring that in as an excuse for an impeachment inquiry.


Oh yes, we have.

Yet you still can't get around that Joey is POTUS and we are sending hundreds of billions to the very same country where the laundering is being done.

You may see it as a dead end and that's fine. Yet here we are, with an impeachment......


Also, happy to be the recipient of your 17000th comment.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

So, I'll ask again:

What foreign policy?
What money?


Burisma?

Russians off the sanctions list?



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Explain why the Obama administration would open their own investigation into Zlochevsky if they were trying to protect Burisma.

Were any other wives of Russian mayors included on the sanction list?



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:41 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

You're moving the goal posts. The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden isn't about the US fidelity to Ukraine, or how congressional war hawks, like Mitch McConnel and Lindsey Graham got us here.

It's about Hunter Biden, but nobody can really say why.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

Explain why the Obama administration would open their own investigation into Zlochevsky if they were trying to protect Burisma.

Were any other wives of Russian mayors included on the sanction list?


Dunno.

Obama was probably scared that Zlochevsky would uncover corruption involving the US.

That'd be my go-to.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Mitch played his part but that's small potatoes compared to Biden, Nulin, McCain and Romney (as well as Graham)

Plus, how are you going to claim that it isn't about Ukraine when the inquiry is based on Joes activity in foreign and domestic business relations....



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

You're moving the goal posts. The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden isn't about the US fidelity to Ukraine, or how congressional war hawks, like Mitch McConnel and Lindsey Graham got us here.

It's about Hunter Biden, but nobody can really say why.



That's because you leftists are trying to blur and obfuscate the issue.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Zlochevsky is the CEO of Burisma. What corruption is he uncovering on the US?



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

Zlochevsky is the CEO of Burisma. What corruption is he uncovering on the US?


Sorry, thought you were talking about the state prosecutor.

Zlochevsky wanted to invest in the US, he couldn't do that while under investigation.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

You're moving the goal posts. The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden isn't about the US fidelity to Ukraine, or how congressional war hawks, like Mitch McConnel and Lindsey Graham got us here.

It's about Hunter Biden, but nobody can really say why.



That's because you leftists are trying to blur and obfuscate the issue.



See, the bad news for you guys is, influence peddling isn't illegal.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 06:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: JinMI

You're moving the goal posts. The impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden isn't about the US fidelity to Ukraine, or how congressional war hawks, like Mitch McConnel and Lindsey Graham got us here.

It's about Hunter Biden, but nobody can really say why.



That's because you leftists are trying to blur and obfuscate the issue.



See, the bad news for you guys is, influence peddling isn't illegal.


lol

You win.

*shrugs*

China can pay Biden openly to spread his legs, Ukraine can launder money openly, for more money, just to enrich the leftists, because it's legal.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 07:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Threadbarer

It's All Fake , and Leave his Dad Alone !






posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: hangedman13

He was also spending money as fast as it was coming in. By 2019, Hunter has pretty much hit rock bottom.


And would the banks be seeing that? No! Unless that money was in the bank. Too bad the loan was not taken out in 2019 "when he pretty much hot rock botton." It raises more questions than it answers.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 07:35 PM
link   
Well it seems the house voted on biden.

BREAKING: The House of Representatives has officially voted to continue its impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden...

www.msn.com... ad-long-said-he-was-against-it/ar-AA1lsLZZ



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 08:02 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Exactly. So if Biden was beholden to Zlochevsky through Hunter, why was an investigation into him launched by Obama's DOJ? If he was so plainly guilty, why was that investigation dropped by Trump's DOJ with no charges?



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 08:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: WingDingLuey

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?


I'm going with Hunter on this.

There must be a reason he insists on this being public.



No. He's deliberately avoiding the classified material in the closed depositions. 😀

Hunter is not a victim, he is a predator. 😀

The Public hearings come after the closed 😀


Honestly, I have no interest in Hunter Biden.

Just stating how it seems.



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 08:28 PM
link   
Imagine being so innocent you have to read a scripted letter and try and slander your accusers.

Of which they have proof.

Hunter talking about decency is like a volcano offering popsicles.




posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: WingDingLuey

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?


I'm going with Hunter on this.

There must be a reason he insists on this being public.



No. He's deliberately avoiding the classified material in the closed depositions. 😀

Hunter is not a victim, he is a predator. 😀

The Public hearings come after the closed 😀


Honestly, I have no interest in Hunter Biden.

Just stating how it seems.


Great! Then you are at peace. 😃



posted on Dec, 13 2023 @ 09:49 PM
link   
a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Are you aware of how Trump acts whenever he has a day in court?



new topics

top topics



 
13
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join