Hunter defies house subpoena

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?

I'm going with Hunter on this.

There must be a reason he insists on this being public.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

What foreign policy?

What money?

The best Comer has been able to come up with at this point is Hunter repaying Joe for a car payment.

So riddle me this, why couldn't Hunter secure his own car loan? He was making money hand over fist so a loan was not an issue. Sounds like he was avoiding something if he had his dad taking on his loan payments. Just like Hunter allegedly paying for things for his dad. The intermingling of their finances does bear investigating. Just like the lawyer who paid off Hunters tax bill may bear looking into. Has Hunter claimed that gift on his current taxes? That sum of money gets anyone else's taxes investigated by the IRS.

a reply to: Annee

Because he saw how Comer tried to twist Archer's deposition into something damning when though Archer specifically testified that he never witnessed Hunter discussing business with Joe.

Notice how that's another thing Comer has shut up about after he got his interview on Fox and Newsmax about it.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

How did $4000 become $1.6 million?

Trump cultist logic - the same way a 1000 sq Metre apartment magically becomes 3000 sq metres

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

Biden conducted foreign policy based on the money he received from foreign entities.

And they're hoping to find the smoking gun evidence of that where?

From the money he received (aka loan payback) for services rendered.

So, you think you're going to find evidence that "Biden conducted foreign policy based on the money he received from foreign entities" from the money Joe got paid back for a loan he made?

How? How is this money going to talk now, when it didn't talk before?

a reply to: bruce88

You keep saying "cultist" as though it has some meaning coming from a recently created account who only has a very single track, myopic point of view and purpose.



Do you require a mirror to access your self awareness?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

How did $4000 become $1.6 million?

Might want to reference the laptop, I might be off by a few thousand, dunno.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

Biden conducted foreign policy based on the money he received from foreign entities.

And they're hoping to find the smoking gun evidence of that where?

From the money he received (aka loan payback) for services rendered.

So, you think you're going to find evidence that "Biden conducted foreign policy based on the money he received from foreign entities" from the money Joe got paid back for a loan he made?

How? How is this money going to talk now, when it didn't talk before?

"Well son of a bitch, he got fired..."

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?

I'm going with Hunter on this.

There must be a reason he insists on this being public.

Is it still public if he swears in on a private disposition?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?

I'm going with Hunter on this.

There must be a reason he insists on this being public.

Republicans have made a habit of twisting what people say behind closed doors, so Hunter not wanting to have his words twisted, wanted it public. Republicans hated that idea.

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

How did $4000 become $1.6 million?

Trump cultist logic - the same way a 1000 sq Metre apartment magically becomes 3000 sq metres

pbuh

a reply to: hangedman13

He was also spending money as fast as it was coming in. By 2019, Hunter has pretty much hit rock bottom.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Annee

Because he saw how Comer tried to twist Archer's deposition into something damning when though Archer specifically testified that he never witnessed Hunter discussing business with Joe.

Notice how that's another thing Comer has shut up about after he got his interview on Fox and Newsmax about it.

Thanks.

Trying to force something into private when person is requesting openly in public -- comes off very suspicious.

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

Biden conducted foreign policy based on the money he received from foreign entities.

And they're hoping to find the smoking gun evidence of that where?

From the money he received (aka loan payback) for services rendered.

So, you think you're going to find evidence that "Biden conducted foreign policy based on the money he received from foreign entities" from the money Joe got paid back for a loan he made?

How? How is this money going to talk now, when it didn't talk before?

Frankly, it's never going to "talk".

Hunter will be pardoned, Biden will win the next election with over 9 trillion votes.

It's where we live now.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I'm sure you can reference me to a relevant article or document.

a reply to: JinMI

Yeah, that's not it. That was pretty public and out in the open that the USA and the IMF weren't going to cough up $1 billion (USA) and $40 billion (IMF) unless Victor Shokin was fired. Son of a bitch! He got fired! 3 months after Biden made the demand and 7 days after the IMF threatened to withhold their $40 billion.

We've been over this, you and me. It's a dead end for you. And, Congress hasn't even tried to bring that in as an excuse for an impeachment inquiry.

a reply to: Sookiechacha

Not to mention it was the State Department that wanted Shokin removed.

It also ignores the fact that the DOJ under Obama opened a case into Zlochevsky. That case was closed by Trump's DOJ with no charges filed.

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: DBCowboy

I'm sure you can reference me to a relevant article or document.

Apologies, the 1.6 was reference to the 1.1 to 1,5 million that Hunter failed to pay in taxes.

This time, I will admit I'm wrong.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?

I'm going with Hunter on this.

There must be a reason he insists on this being public.

No. He's deliberately avoiding the classified material in the closed depositions. 😀

Hunter is not a victim, he is a predator. 😀

The Public hearings come after the closed 😀

originally posted by: bruce88

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: network dude

The committee already has James' financial documents. Do you not find it strange that Comer shut up about it after Raskin pointed out that those documents show James receiving money from Biden and then paying it back within weeks?

I'm going with Hunter on this.

There must be a reason he insists on this being public.

Republicans have made a habit of twisting what people say behind closed doors, so Hunter not wanting to have his words twisted, wanted it public. Republicans hated that idea.

There's Democrats in the closed hearings too, and there's transcripts however redacted. 😀