It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sendhelp
Flyers fan literally said "never heard of him" then Leviathan said it doesn't matter if you have or not which I thought was hilarious. How arrogant of flyers fan lmao. Then Flyers fan responded "I never said heard of anything." LOL LOL
originally posted by: TheValeyard
a reply to: MoreCoyoteAngels
They're literally sending money to the Taliban and shipping funds for HAMAS's war effort.
Why would they not supply Israel with weapons too?
They're making bank on this.
Come on now.
It ain't about taking sides,
it's about who profits from the fighting.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: Leviathan4
It seems from your response you can't really deal with facts.
You posted his OPINION. That's not a FACT. Learn the difference.
FACT - no where does the CNN article say this guy was a SENIOR State Department official. You made that up. So the fact is that your thread title and premise is false - as usual.
FACT - he's just a guy with an opinion that is different than State Department policy, so he quit. SO WHAT?
FACT - the rest of the State Department continue to support the US policy and mission with Israel.
FACT - you like the reason he quit so you are propagating it here. It matches your own agenda.
Those are the facts. Deal with them.
it's an uncontroversial fact that US Arms should not be used to Massacre civilians and should not be used to result in massive civilian casualties. US Arms should not be used to kill civilians
originally posted by: sendhelp
Flyers fan literally said "never heard of him" then Leviathan said it doesn't matter if you have or not which I thought was hilarious. How arrogant of flyers fan lmao. Then Flyers fan responded "I never said heard of anything." LOL LOL
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: TheValeyard
a reply to: MoreCoyoteAngels
They're literally sending money to the Taliban and shipping funds for HAMAS's war effort.
Why would they not supply Israel with weapons too?
They're making bank on this.
Come on now.
It ain't about taking sides,
it's about who profits from the fighting.
Who gets the spoils of Gaza, as in the oil there, yet to be drilled?
originally posted by: TheValeyard
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: TheValeyard
a reply to: MoreCoyoteAngels
They're literally sending money to the Taliban and shipping funds for HAMAS's war effort.
Why would they not supply Israel with weapons too?
They're making bank on this.
Come on now.
It ain't about taking sides,
it's about who profits from the fighting.
Who gets the spoils of Gaza, as in the oil there, yet to be drilled?
It's not even about Gaza, but rather about justifying an invasion of Iran.
That's why they sent the money knowing what they'd do with it.
It was bait.
Notice how the talk about Iran sounds recently?
originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: Leviathan4
War is a very dirty and ugly thing. If more understood that, there might just be less of a urge to start one. Once started, then the cause must be delt with. Hiding fighters by mixing in public is not a good idea for the public.
originally posted by: Leviathan4
" it's an uncontroversial fact that US Arms should not be used to Massacre civilians and should not be used to result in massive civilian casualties. US Arms should not be used to kill civilians"
What he said it's a fact .
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Leviathan4
Quick question regarding "civilians".
What uniform does the palestinians, when they are killing, raping, torturing innocent Jews, what uniforms do they wear?
originally posted by: TheValeyard
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: TheValeyard
a reply to: MoreCoyoteAngels
They're literally sending money to the Taliban and shipping funds for HAMAS's war effort.
Why would they not supply Israel with weapons too?
They're making bank on this.
Come on now.
It ain't about taking sides,
it's about who profits from the fighting.
Who gets the spoils of Gaza, as in the oil there, yet to be drilled?
It's not even about Gaza, but rather about justifying an invasion of Iran.
That's why they sent the money knowing what they'd do with it.
It was bait.
Notice how the talk about Iran sounds recently?
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
a reply to: Leviathan4
The US official policy is that Israel "has the right to defend itself".
To that end, it is understandable that Israel maintains sufficient military assets to provide for such "defence". And it is reasonable, as inherent within these bounds, that military equipment be made available to Israel by the US...
For the purpose of Defense.
But, do the citizens of Gaza enjoy the same "right of defense"? If so, who, or what body is recognized, and/or "officially charged with ensuring said Defense?
And if the Gazans enjoy no such right....
Why Not?
originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
a reply to: quintessentone
Of course you wont. You do you.
But the best way to combat propaganda is not give it a forum.
originally posted by: Mantiss2021
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Leviathan4
Quick question regarding "civilians".
What uniform does the palestinians, when they are killing, raping, torturing innocent Jews, what uniforms do they wear?
Quick question back to you: "What uniform are the allowed to wear?"
Does Israel allow a "Defense Force (military)" to represent the citizens of Gaza?