It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: JinMI
Fair
Red gonna red
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: TTU77
Too many innocents will loose their lives to justify this conflict.
We need to remove from power those who cannot achieve the peace, prosperity, purpose and wellbeing of those they represent, and to try new leadership, successively replacing them, until those goals are achieved.
The divisions are a nonsense. We are all human. We all have rights and needs.
Nice approach.
Might want to mention it to those who are going to kill babies in front of their mothers.
I'm sure they'll listen to reason.
Those who commit such atrocities should not be allowed any sort of political power or social standing and should be immediately prosecuted for their crimes.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut
That's rich.
You were here spouting about people how people needed to accept a needling they didn't want.
And actively working with/for that same government.
You may want to sit this one out.
I was not promoting forcible inoculation. I was trying to explain why it was an acceptable choice, a balance of potential risks, in an environment where it was being falsely painted as exceptionally dangerous.
I see you moving that Goal post
you might trip over the line and stumble onto Objective critical thinking .
I am not the voices in your head.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut
That's rich.
You were here spouting about people how people needed to accept a needling they didn't want.
And actively working with/for that same government.
You may want to sit this one out.
I was not promoting forcible inoculation. I was trying to explain why it was an acceptable choice, a balance of potential risks, in an environment where it was being falsely painted as exceptionally dangerous.
I see you moving that Goal post
you might trip over the line and stumble onto Objective critical thinking .
I am not the voices in your head.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
Firstly the Voices in my Head are' Christian Bales ' Batman and sometimes 'Tom Hardy's ' Bane.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
hey mate what ever you have to tell yourself
You individually no , But the entire group of you's that think and disseminate information the way you do are very responsible for leading people towards the wrong decisions and aggressive narrative thinking
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut
That's rich.
You were here spouting about people how people needed to accept a needling they didn't want.
And actively working with/for that same government.
You may want to sit this one out.
I was not promoting forcible inoculation. I was trying to explain why it was an acceptable choice, a balance of potential risks, in an environment where it was being falsely painted as exceptionally dangerous.
I see you moving that Goal post
you might trip over the line and stumble onto Objective critical thinking .
I am not the voices in your head.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
Firstly the Voices in my Head are' Christian Bales ' Batman and sometimes 'Tom Hardy's ' Bane.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
hey mate what ever you have to tell yourself
You individually no , But the entire group of you's that think and disseminate information the way you do are very responsible for leading people towards the wrong decisions and aggressive narrative thinking
originally posted by: Buuux
▪️ It is impossible to resolve the situation without resolving fundamental political issues, which is, first of all, the creation of a sovereign Palestinian state.
▪️ The Palestinian problem is in the heart of every Muslim, it is perceived as injustice to an incredible degree. In Israel and the United States, supporters of a military solution are gaining the upper hand...
▪️ If men decide to fight among themselves, let them fight. Leave children and women alone - we need to minimize civilian casualties.
valdimir Putin
Settlement mechanisms exist for Palestine, but the United States neglects them and tries to replace a poltical solution with some kind of material handouts for Palestine.
▪️ There is a risk that the conflict will expand beyond Palestine - this will have dire consequences.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut
That's rich.
You were here spouting about people how people needed to accept a needling they didn't want.
And actively working with/for that same government.
You may want to sit this one out.
I was not promoting forcible inoculation. I was trying to explain why it was an acceptable choice, a balance of potential risks, in an environment where it was being falsely painted as exceptionally dangerous.
I see you moving that Goal post
you might trip over the line and stumble onto Objective critical thinking .
I am not the voices in your head.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
Firstly the Voices in my Head are' Christian Bales ' Batman and sometimes 'Tom Hardy's ' Bane.
Think about it logically, what sort of actual power do you think I had, to enforce anyone to have an immunization? Your line of thinking seems to be making the assumption that I was doing that.
hey mate what ever you have to tell yourself
You individually no , But the entire group of you's that think and disseminate information the way you do are very responsible for leading people towards the wrong decisions and aggressive narrative thinking
Rofl how did you find that
Free palentine literally means the genocide on all jews - and on all Christians until the whole world is muslim.
They won't settle for less. They could have had a 2 state solution for decades, but hard passed on it.
originally posted by: Involutionist
a reply to: TTU77
Free palentine literally means the genocide on all jews - and on all Christians until the whole world is muslim.
This is a geopolitical issue. Not a religious one. What are your thoughts concerning Christian Palestinians...?
Only the naive perceive this as a religious debacle. This all about hegemony. Period.
They won't settle for less. They could have had a 2 state solution for decades, but hard passed on it.
Oh really...?! Please, educate me more about that part of history.
ATS still denying ignorance or are those days long past?
originally posted by: wdkirk
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: TTU77
Too many innocent bystanders will loose their lives to justify military conflict.
We need to remove from power those who cannot achieve the peace, prosperity, purpose and wellbeing of those they represent, and to try new leadership, successively replacing them, until those goals are achieved.
The divisions are a nonsense. We are all human. We all have rights and needs.
With a gun to your forehead put there by a man who has no problem defending his beliefs, by all means talk him out of it because you know….division is non-sense.
When the fighting starts, please sit it out so the rest of us are not in danger because of your lack of decisiveness.
Violence solves more problems than any other solutions combined. You can’t talk your way out of this. Time to pick a side or sit it out.
I stand with Israel. The time for talk is over.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: TTU77
Too many innocent bystanders will loose their lives to justify military conflict.
We need to remove from power those who cannot achieve the peace, prosperity, purpose and wellbeing of those they represent, and to try new leadership, successively replacing them, until those goals are achieved.
The divisions are a nonsense. We are all human. We all have rights and needs.
Until this war started, I hadn't been here for a while. I see I can still count on you to be on the wrong side of everything.
Which 'side' do you think I am on?
Both Hamas and the Israeli military response are detestable.