British Prime Minister says Traditional Understanding of Gender is Common Sense

a reply to: Muldar

Well, at least i seem to be the one person, there is always that.

Also, you appear to be mistaking my attempt at levity for aggression.

I think its meaningless twonk that Sunak's punting yet perfectly predictable.

He should be concentrating on the real issues the nation faces as opposed to pandering and pulling on the heartstrings of the gammon amongst his ranks by my guess.

But hey-ho votes is votes, and he is apt to need those soon, no mater who they come from.

a reply to: andy06shake

Watching MOTD.

Hoping Arsenal lose.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Muldar

I already did?

But feel free to ignore it and carry on regardless.

I do live in the UK and have told you. There aren't any.


Your point is therefore otiose.

Perhaps your translator can't cope with that word?

So there are no politicians who may think there are more than 2 genders or that a transwoman is a woman?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

I still can't see anything wrong with what the Prime Minister said. It seems a serious matter if the entire country has been affected by identity politics.

ying yang
boy girl
1 0
male female

doesnt matter what bits are chopped off or created or how you dress it up

its still ying or yang....

a reply to: Muldar
I was entertained!
...to be fair, catching up with this thread has been a really entertaining read, to end a Sunday night!🤪👍

originally posted by: AdultMaleHuman73
a reply to: Muldar
I was entertained!
...to be fair, catching up with this thread has been a really entertaining read, to end a Sunday night!🤪👍

Glad you've been entertained!!
There is another thread with relevant content.

a reply to: andy06shake

Why would it be pandering, if he is speaking his opinion?

Has he taken the opposite view in public statements prior to this?

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

For the same reason other politicians pander and say certain things, and at specific times, so they can fall upon the ears of potential voters.

Like i said votes are votes.

a reply to: andy06shake

Votes are votes.... but politicians have genuine opinions too. Otherwise they would switch parties constantly chasing votes.

Maybe that happens on your side of the pond, but not here.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Votes are votes.... but politicians have genuine opinions too. Otherwise they would switch parties constantly chasing votes.

So the penny drops after all?

Just a thought but since you freely admit you don't know anything about Rishi Sunak, how would you know if his opinion is genuine?

Maybe that happens on your side of the pond, but not here.

Yeh, i think you may find which side of the political aisle, and who people happen to vote for, can change your side of the pond also, and hence the reason your man Trump was voted out on his arse last time around.

People's opinions can change, especially so where politics are concerned.

a reply to: andy06shake

And yet Trump got more votes second time around than first.

Voters switch. Politicians dont'.

I take people at their word when they say what they believe.

why wouldn't I?

Do you think everyone is always lying to you or just politicians?

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

And yet Trump got more votes second time around than first.

Shame he did not get more than his opponent.

Voters switch. Politicians dont'.

Did Trump not used to be an independent and also a democrat at one point? LoL

I take people at their word when they say what they believe.

why wouldn't I?

Because people lie for specific reasons or to gain favor especially politicians springs to mind.

Do you think everyone is always lying to you or just politicians?

That's a good question with rather an expansive, predominantly yes im afraid, but not always for nefarious reasons.

www.crossrivertherapy.com...#:~:text=On%20a%20daily%20occurrence%2C%20there,%2C%2031%25%20of%20people%20lie.
www.paulekman.com...
psychcentral.com...

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

some men can not see women as having full agency or that their vote matters in elections.. but the parties do hence why they are chasing women's vote.

Now the time of no debate is finally over the political parties are actively seeking women's vote, both left and right want to be seen as the party of women, the party that supports women and the party of that safeguards women and girls.

what happened in Israel is going to hurt those who have been and are equivocating in response to videos that show women who have been obviously brutally raped, you simply can not trust safeguarding the vulnerable to such people..

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Votes are votes.... but politicians have genuine opinions too. Otherwise they would switch parties constantly chasing votes.

So the penny drops after all?

Just a thought but since you freely admit you don't know anything about Rishi Sunak, how would you know if his opinion is genuine?

Maybe that happens on your side of the pond, but not here.

Yeh, i think you may find which side of the political aisle, and who people happen to vote for, can change your side of the pond also, and hence the reason your man Trump was voted out on his arse last time around.

People's opinions can change, especially so where politics are concerned.

.
Nope!

Sunak is British-Indian and he is very unlikely to be a supporter of the radical left woke nonsense that preaches the existence of an infinite amount of genders. A bit of logic helps...

a reply to: Muldar

Sunak is a Tory Muldar so indeed hardly likely to be a supporter of the radical left-woke nonsense anything.

Don't change the fact that he's pandering for votes by saying what a certain group of people wish to hear.

Logic suggests you should know the lay of the land before choosing to open your puss.

And the fact is you know about as much about Sunak as you do British politics.

originally posted by: nickyw
a reply to: LABTECH767

as some blame thatcher for the pits, I blame major for black Wednesday, cost lots of people i know their homes and jobs adding the concept of negative equity to our lexicon and letting a huge chunk of the first time buyers homes fall into landlord hands has done deep damage to the uks housing market by taking out that first rung, much of that pain sits on majors shoulders..

What you have to remember about Thatcher is that she had ulterior motives, her husband was not just the humble millionaire he as supposed to be but had according to some up to two billion in hidden offshore funds and investments.

Old Dennis want a piece of our Coal selling pie, we at the time had some of the most coal powered fire stations in western Europe and it cost the then National Grid that ran our pre-privatisation power grid about one pound sterling per ton of Coal that coal board could dig up but apparently old Dennis had stakes in some south American coal mines among other investments and could supply the same amount of coal albeit sulphur rich south American coal when our own Coal was among the cleanest burning coal in the world for penny's per ton if he could wangle a way to get into the venture of supplying our national grid with that dirty south American coal.

Eventually with millions or perhaps even billions squirreled away in a military junta run African nation that was overthrown by an uprising that established Democracy there his Son tried to get back the money that his by then deceased father had lost in that uprising by backing a coup plot, thatcher's son then ended up of course in prison.

Another interesting story about that woman's family (remember she was best of friends with a NAZI harbouring Chilean Junta as well that had murdered the previous democratically elected leader of that nation and many other people within it's borders but that was at least friendly to us although that was for shared vested interests of that Junta) is that one David Cameron at that time an intern working in the conservative party was according to one story sent to act as a representative to the Saudis to oversee the illegal hand over of Nuclear weapons to them, those nukes were the supposedly decommissioned but not yet fully dismantled south African nukes that were then delivered to an open, unguarded and suspicious storage yard in Saudi Arabia where they then conveniently disappeared overnight and the Conservative party was then given a large cash donation by the Saudi royal family.

Basically crook's.

But if you try to track down this story about the missing south African nukes which was available until up to two years ago on the internet you will find it very hard indeed to find it, now whether it was real or something made up to slander Cameron I do not know but something tells me that it is actually very true.
www.globalresearch.ca...
truepublica.org.uk... thebridgelifeinthemix.info...

edit on 9-10-2023 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)