It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Stopstealingmycountry
a reply to: stevieray
A pastor could easily trap a child and the parents would have no idea because of their own blind faith. Same as the boy scouts in every country.
Maybe start with those two organizations then go from there because they have cause much more harm to children than trans folk.
can someone born female really call themselves a transgender man when it's clear they haven't totally turned their back on their birth gender, engaging in sex as a female and giving birth as a female? Same with a person born male.
Can they truly say they are transgender and female when they still have a penis and they engage in sexual relations with that penis and make babies with it?
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
apparently they can. So, what's the gripe.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: FlyersFan
can someone born female really call themselves a transgender man when it's clear they haven't totally turned their back on their birth gender, engaging in sex as a female and giving birth as a female? Same with a person born male.
Apparently,,,,,,they can
Can they truly say they are transgender and female when they still have a penis and they engage in sexual relations with that penis and make babies with it?
Again, apparently they can. So, what's the gripe.
originally posted by: Doxanoxa
a reply to: Stopstealingmycountry
Because they are a pair of egotists, and it's this that will do the child harm.
None of this story was necessary to be told, but it was told.
I've known a number of couples where the female does the man stuff and the male does the female stuff.
They have children,, jobs, friends, mortgages, cars, and holidays. In short, they are normally living lives.
I guess from talking with some of them they know they would rather have another body, but they dont. They have someone who loves them for who they are inside instead.
So I care because while it may serm they are desperate for a child, they awere more desperate for the publicity. And thats not good for the child.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: FlyersFan
Without heterosexuality, no species would continue.
Well certainly, and that was my point. Heterosexuality has reigned supreme among the human species and look where that has taken us, right up to the edge of the extinction cliff.
Are you concerned that heterosexuality will be driven off? That all will be queer and no male female copulation will occur? But wait, take a look at this thread that was put up today
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Maybe the concern here is that we might be headed to a world where the women no longer need men to have sex with or to reproduce. I"m just trying to understand the emphatic dislike for non hetero sexuality.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
I figured it needn't matter to me at all as there were much larger and much more important things to pay attention to and to think about.
originally posted by: nickyw
growing up in tolerant brighton its sad to see it descend into intolerance angry mob unable to laugh at itself..
Several of you are stuck in the ever-brilliant belief that trans and other strange folks can jibber jabber 24/7, but people who won’t celebrate them should be silenced.