One of UK's most prolific serial killer is convicted of murdering 7 babies and for 6 murder attempts

a reply to: teapot



Spot on methinks teapot.

As to why people want to understand how she could have committed such unforgivable acts of depraved evil.

Closure might be one possible answer i suppose.

But like you suggest it won't change what she did.

What was the penalty for witchcraft back in the day? Is that old law still on the books? Id say she deserves it more than most of those innocent women.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

See sense Itisnowagain.

Lucy Letby is an evil cow.

Locked away for life.

And for very good reasons.

If social media videos could have changed the outcome of this case, or the information contained within, they would have done so at the appropriate venue, aka the criminal court of law that she was convicted.

Not everything is a conspiracy you see.

a reply to: andy06shake

The Birmingham six?
Rebecca Leighton?
Lucia de Berk?

It appears that sometimes people are wrongly convicted......just saying.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Did they have Post-it notes presented in evidence against them at their trial, in their own handwriting, that pretty much amounted to a confession of guilt?

Were they in attendance when all those babies died, or were injured in hospital, or attempted to contact the parents of the poor victims afterward for sick empathy kudos?

You realise you are sticking up for a known convicted baby killer.

And your reasoning seems to be because of silly social media videos that make sad claims.

Or the fact that you find many of said videos on YouTube hard to come by.

Claims in videos, that if they had merit, or could be substantiated, would have been used in her defense at her trial.

Again there is no real doubt as to Lucy Letby's guilt, and she has been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Good luck punting or entertaining anything to the contrary.

a reply to: andy06shake

Was there raw sewage coming up through the plug holes.....and flooding the floors?

Why did the unit stop taking 27 week preterms as soon as Letby stopped working there?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

So now you are claiming raw sewage was responsible or killed and injured the babies and not Letby.

Tell me this, were the injuries sustained and cause of death to those babies consistent with the likes of problems that raw sewage could have caused?

All of the babies?

You are grasping at straws Itisnowagain.

The evidence against Letby is pretty much unsurmountable and has been proven to be the case in a court of law.

Im just going to stop feeding you now because people who choose to stick up for the likes of baby killers irritate me and i don't want to end up saying something nasty.

It will simply turn into pages of you being unwilling to accept the proven facts of the matter.

Have a nice day, those little dead babies don't have that luxury.

a reply to: andy06shake

You realise you are sticking up for a known convicted baby killer.

I think you have been blinded by your conviction.......
I am simply showing that there are people who questioning whether she is guilty....

I am sticking up for the truth...

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Crazy people on social media videos that by your own admission you find hard to even come by.

People who if they had anything relevant to add or present would have done so in court or been called to do so on Letby's behalf.

Again Andy out.

a reply to: andy06shake

Why did the unit stop taking 27 wk preterm babies right after she stopped working there?

There are many many unanswered questions.

I think there should be a retrial with scientists on the stand and not doctors .....if there is a next time.

a reply to: andy06shake

Professor Norman Fenton and Dr Scott McLachlan MCSE, MCT, DSysEng, GDipInfSc, GDipBus, DipLaw, GDL, GCTTLP, MPhilSc, LLM are crazy people in your opinion for having concerns about the evidence presented in court....ok..

It's not the people who are posting the videos that are hard to find......it's the subject that is hard to find......

It's rather odd.

Well, the harder people look, the stranger this thing becomes.
There are a number of potential conclusions here, Lucy Letby as a murderer being one of them.

However, I would like to add some additional material from other people that address the fact that much of the 'evidence' was circumstantial.
I know some of you can only see dead babies and don't want to think about it. You need a focal point for your hatred and Lucy will do.

For those of you who want to give it some independent thought:

www.bbc.co.uk...

www.reddit.com...

lawhealthandtech.substack.com...

Not having seen the actual court transcripts, I have no idea if any of this so called 'circumstantial' evidence includes autopsy or coroners reports.

The babies deaths were not found to be of natural causes, that's why there was an investigation and subsequent prosecution.

How many of those exploiting this situation (to make a name for themselves?) have provided any evidence at all for how the babies died of unnatural causes? Have any of these 'polemicists' considered if Letby was not the one who poisoned these people, then who was?

I demand anyone crying miscarriage of justice point their finger at the true culprit because somebody murdered those babies and that person is either justly incarcerated or needs to be apprehended and dealt with.

Oh and crumbling UK infrastructure is sujet du jour and all about dissing Rishi.

a reply to: teapot

Most, if not all of what I have seen and heard, aren't saying that there is an actual murderer (another culprit)...as such.

I have read that deaths did not decline after she was removed though.....you can read about it on the chimp investor link I posted on the last page.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

One of the jurors has been discharged by the Judge because of 'good personal reasons'. Not very enlightening as it is vital to know why the juror left. He/she asked to leave and not at the beginning or half way through the process but at the very end and only a few weeks before the verdict.


www.theguardian.com...

originally posted by: Lucius Driftwood
Well, the harder people look, the stranger this thing becomes.
There are a number of potential conclusions here, Lucy Letby as a murderer being one of them.

However, I would like to add some additional material from other people that address the fact that much of the 'evidence' was circumstantial.
I know some of you can only see dead babies and don't want to think about it. You need a focal point for your hatred and Lucy will do.

For those of you who want to give it some independent thought:

www.bbc.co.uk...

www.reddit.com...

lawhealthandtech.substack.com...

Thanks

Really good information.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Lucy Letby raised alarm to save infant, baby deaths trial hears as consultant admits he blundered by leaving the sick infant alone with monitor switched off
Dr John Gibbs admitted he made 'a serious error' in leaving a sick infant alone
He acknowledged he should have handed over the child's care to a nurse
Baby G was left in a treatment trolley moments after a difficult procedure
Lucy Letby found the infant and shouted for help, the nurse's murder trial heard
Nurse and alleged killer Letby carried out emergency treatment to revive Baby G
Letby denies murdering seven babies and attempting to murder a further ten

www.dailymail.co.uk...

'Karen Rees interview with ITV' on youtube is worth a watch.....it's on the yt channel 'Lucy Letby: An Independent Review' .......which is where I found out about the mail online article I linked above.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Im not a judge Itisnowagain, or in a position to answer that question.

Let's just hope those found to be responsible, or complicit, are indeed held to account.

Because covering up people killing kids is just about as diabolical an act as murdering the poor little sods.

Indeed.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Im not a judge Itisnowagain, or in a position to answer that question.

Let's just hope those found to be responsible, or complicit, are indeed held to account.

Because covering up people killing kids is just about as diabolical an act as murdering the poor little sods.

Indeed.

I think there could be others involved and this is a very difficult cases after all.