One of UK's most prolific serial killer is convicted of murdering 7 babies and for 6 murder attempts

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AlienBorg

Did you watch either of the videos I mentioned?

Yes both.
I ve even linked them earlier. The one you told me to search I watched it twice.

The amazing thing is the people who make comments below the video, and there are hundreds of them, have openly expressed doubts or believe she is not guilty.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Another video

youtu.be...

More doubts and questions.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Thank you for posting..I haven't seen that one.....watching it now.
You might like to check out Mark Mayes channel on yt....he has many. Did you watch the Professor Norman Fenton interview?

It still seems to me that yt do not want any of the public to find or watch any 'is she innocent' videos .........

Well done for finding the one you just posted ......I didn't find it yesterday.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

The prosecution was able to present evidence of Letby using various methods to attack babies, including: the injection of air and insulin into their bloodstream; the infusion of air into their gastrointestinal tract; force feeding an overdose of milk or fluids; impact-type trauma.

The prosecution said notes found in Lucy's bedroom amounted to confessions of guilt, rather than the outpourings of a woman in "distress". Officers raiding Letby's bedroom also found some 257 confidential hospital documents, including handover and resuscitation sheets and blood gas readings, hidden away in bags.

No real doubt about the fact that she was responsible for the death of those poor wee souls.

The real question that remains unanswered is why she chose to do such a thing?

The real question is ....

Why doesn't youtube list anything about Lucy Letby being innocent when you do a search (is Lucy Letby innocent?)?

It appears as if those videos are being hidden. I never found the video AlienBorg posted but the title of the video is 'Is Lucy Letby innocent?' .....yet it was posted 8 days ago.

Surely the results should be at the top....but instead it will takes ages to find them.

Don't you find that odd?

a reply to: AlienBorg

Some interesting information to read on here :
www.chimpinvestor.com...#:

a reply to: Freeborn

Its up to each of us to weigh up the evidence available and formulate our own opinion free from any preconceived viewpoint or bias.

Don't you find it even a little bit suspicious, that any videos that question her guilt, are hard to find?

It's pretty difficult to weigh up anything if you only have one side of the story.

I was completely believing that she did it until I started talking about her the other day saying how awful it was ......and then they said "well..... she may not be guilty"......wtf?
I was shocked......I said I would like to know more.....and then I was given the title of the video (and yt channel) so I could find it and then watch it.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Why doesn't youtube list anything about Lucy Letby being innocent when you do a search (is Lucy Letby innocent?)?

I'm not sure, but there is plenty of evidence to suggest Lucy Letby is anything but innocent.

If it's conspiracy nonsense featuring ""alternative facts"" your after my bet is Bitchute/Parlor or Telegram will accommodate those needs.

To be honest with you Itisnowagain i dont know how the YouTube algorithm works but my bet would be the same to similar as the likes of Twitter(x) or Facebook.

I find it odd given the level of evidence that led to her conviction, including handwritten notes and post-its, in her own writing that pretty much highlighted and documented the horrendous acts of depravity she chose to commit on little innocent babies that people would even entertain the notion as to her innocence.

Maybe YouTube is choosing to disregard or refuse to host the nonsense down to the fact that it might be rather upsetting to the parents of her victims may be one possible answer i suppose, but don't hold me to it.

a reply to: andy06shake

Did you watch any of the videos I mentioned or is the case closed in your opinion?

Maybe you don't want to rock your boat....but I like to see a fuller, bigger picture.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Itisnowagain

Why doesn't youtube list anything about Lucy Letby being innocent when you do a search (is Lucy Letby innocent?)?

Maybe YouTube is choosing to disregard or refuse to host the nonsense down to the fact that it might be rather upsetting to the parents of her victims may be one possible answer i suppose, but don't hold me to it.

They are not refusing to host them......they are there but it takes ages to find them...

a reply to: Itisnowagain

The case is closed down to the evidence the courts of law used to convict the monster Itisnowagain.

Im apt to believe the evidence presented against her in a criminal court by professionals.

Rather than videos posted on social media that pander to the innocence of someone clearly disturbed, who chooses to kill kids, mostly created by people with their own possible mental health issues to contend with.

Did you read the notes and post its?

'I am evil'
One, a green Post-It note found inside a 2016 diary, contained what appeared to look like a confession: "I AM EVIL I DID THIS." On the same note, Letby wrote: "I killed them on purpose because I'm not good enough."

To be honest with you watching anything to do with the monster brings a tear to my eye and bile to the back of my throat.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

You may need to consider the number of videos posted pertaining to the lady in question uploaded to the likes of YouTube.

Which may be influencing your ability to find footage that contradicts the facts that again have been proven beyond reasonable doubt in a criminal court of law.

a reply to: andy06shake

So you haven’t looked any deeper.....yet you said this the other day on this thread:

Its just so hard to accept she could do such a thing.

Did you even read the chimp investor link?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

You can look as deep as you please Itisnowagain.

But you won't change the outcome of the court or overturn the conviction of a monster who kills babies via opinion pieces on YouTube.

I simply canny stomach watching people stick up for scum like her Itisnowagain.

And your video is also 40 minutes long, so a small summary might be in order.

Do you think Lucy Letby is innocent down to opinions presented in social media videos?

What about the near unsurmountable evidence presented against her in a real court of law that secured her conviction?

Maybe best to simply accept what she is, would be my advice there, but each to there own.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

So you believe she is innocent, thats your choice but she has been found guilty in a court of law

unless you want to raise a gofundme that is where she will rot

a reply to: andy06shake

"Rather than videos posted on social media that pander to the innocence of someone clearly disturbed, who chooses to kill kids, mostly created by people with their own possible mental health issues to contend with."

They are questioning if she is guilty.......for reasons you won't even bother to listen to.

a reply to: UpThenDown

There is already a campaign running to get her an appeal.

I haven’t said that I believe she is innocent btw.

originally posted by: andy06shake
Rather than videos posted on social media that pander to the innocence of someone clearly disturbed, who chooses to kill kids, mostly created by people with their own possible mental health issues to contend with.

Or people with a vested interest in denying their own feelings of guilt, that they knew her and knew she needed help and ignored those needs.

Mentally maintaining the fiction Letby could not have done such things and using social media etc to promote that fiction, helps them not have to grieve for what is real and supplicate that feeling with moral outrage at their self perceived injustice of the situation.

None of those people give a damn for the dead babies parents or for those babies whose health is perhaps permanently damaged.

Not sure why anyone wants to understand why somebody can commit so gross a sin. Be happy you do not know her reasons.

a reply to: andy06shake

A very small summary is on the chimp investor link.

And the transcript for the video is on Reddit.
It starts off with this:

Good afternoon, I'm Norman Fenton, and I'm here with Dr. Scott McLachlan. Scott completed his PhD on the topic of learning health systems under my supervision in 2009, at Queen Mary University of London, and he's been following this case for a while now, and is especially well-qualified to comment on it. That's because, in addition to his PhD, he not only originally qualified as a nurse, but also has several legal degrees. And he's currently a lecturer in Digital Technologies for Health in the Division of Applied Technologies for Clinical Care with the faculty of Nursing at King's College.

www.reddit.com...

a reply to: Itisnowagain

It works both ways buddy.

You refuse to summerise your 40-minute long video, which is the done thing around these parts and can't be bothered to introduce any salient points you feel are somehow relevant to your argument. LoL

Maybe you have not watched it yourself for all we know now?

If so I'm sure you will be able to raise the relevant challenges regarding Letby being innocent and tell us why you feel they somehow change the outcome or result.

Do you beleve she inocent?

And if so, is that because of social media videos, as opposed to actual evidence, again presented in a court of law?

She is guilty and there is no real doubt about that ""proven fact"".

a reply to: andy06shake

See edit.