It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: Mahogany
mental incompetence.
Which would also disqualify him from holding office.
Why haven’t they ousted Biden for that yet then?
He is 10Xs worse than Trump.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: olaru12
Yet those indictment policies don't apply to Trump....
Don't you find that odd at the least, troubling at the worst?
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: olaru12
You speak to his intention.
th
Do you think Trump believes the election was faulty, rigged, irregular in count and law etc?
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: olaru12
So rationale is still out the window.
We can try again next year.
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: Mahogany
mental incompetence.
Which would also disqualify him from holding office.
Why haven’t they ousted Biden for that yet then?
He is 10Xs worse than Trump.
originally posted by: Mahogany
originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: Mahogany
mental incompetence.
Which would also disqualify him from holding office.
Why haven’t they ousted Biden for that yet then?
He is 10Xs worse than Trump.
Because he's never claimed mental incompetence while standing criminal trial.
And no, I don't think Trump will do this, but it is out there as a Hail Mary, last ditch effort if he wants to stay out of prison. He COULD claim that he did not understand anything the advisers were telling him or that he was temporarily insane and could not comprehend what all these people counseled him on. That he was so shocked by the loss, he doesn't even remember what he was doing or saying.
He could claim this, but I think a mental health evaluation would still show that he is not crazy, he knew exactly what he was being told and he knew exactly what he was doing.
But, as a Hail Mary, he could try this.
originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: carewemust
It seems a wise decision.
In the UK it would be contempt of court to make such statements as a deliberate attempt to cause a trial to collapse, plus it would undermine the defence by providing ammo to the prosecution via 'prior notification'.
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: bastion
a reply to: carewemust
It seems a wise decision.
In the UK it would be contempt of court to make such statements as a deliberate attempt to cause a trial to collapse, plus it would undermine the defence by providing ammo to the prosecution via 'prior notification'.
Some form of this is true under US laws, though I'm not familiar enough with this to elaborate. From what I've read in passing, this seems to be what Trump is being warned against.
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Byrd
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Byrd
All that is fair.
My question then is, don't you have questions regarding this story?
Yes, but they mainly revolve around 'why didn't anyone reading the story do a fact check of neutral sources on that story'? And 'why is Gateway Pundit making an issue of a 3 year old story that had no impact on the election itself?'
Why is TGP making an issue of a case that involved a rather large amount of election fraud that had no criminal case brought, was handed to the FBI where no investigation was done let alone a criminal case brought and was bankrolled by a company doing this all over the state?
Yea Byrd....i dunno.
originally posted by: IndieA
Let us not forget the other 18 co-defendants that this matter also concerns.[/quotTe]
My honest opinion is that they're pretty much hosed. I think some of them are going to take plea bargains.
It's good that Trump let it made know that he has evidence of election fraud that he plans to use in his defense, and I think it's good that he waits to properly file it with the court.
I think that if you follow closely, you aren't going to see any new evidence of election fraud. All the other evidence presented has proved to be false (he lost all but one case and some of the judges were actually Republican and Trump friendly -- or so I've read.)
Once the truth comes out, the media, the J6 committee, and some gov agencies, will have some explaining to do for spreading election lies and much more.
My personal belief is that once the truth comes out, Mr. Trump's allies are going to be facing a lot of fines and jail time, and Mr. Trump will NOT be exonerated. Don't know if you're aware of it (you can look it up) but every Republican since Bush has entered the White House after LOSING the popular vote but winning the Electoral College. He's not as popular as he pretends to be.
It's vitality important to freedom and democracy that our elections are honest, verifiable, and they follow the law. Ignoring or fostering issues only leads to more issues, it's that simple. Friendly "audits" and limited recounts are unacceptable with the current problems and security risks. It's now more important than ever, that we restore integrity to our elections, and to do so there needs to be a change in mindset that only the truth and whole truth can bring.
As I've said so many times, I sincerely hope that you will take the time to go to your local county elections board and ask to be trained as an elections clerk... and then will serve as a clerk. You can better talk about the audit process and behind the scenes because you'll be part of it and you'll be helping preserve the right to vote and the right to a fair election.
I've done it myself. I tell everyone who can to please go and do it. It's one day every year or (local elections) and it's a very important service that we can all do.