Fanni Willis Charges Trump Before Georgia Grand Jury Vote; She’s Now Facing Potential Removal

originally posted by: WingDingLuey

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JIMC5499

This won't be going to the SCOTUS. It's a state case.

unless something unconstitutional is challenged

or creates a constitutional crisis.

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

You realize there are things called federal cases, right?

So now the department is admitting they posted the document prior to the jury vote.
Amazing

What a crap fest.

Well done dems
You own this

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

You realize there are things called federal cases, right?

do they have the ability to rule on cases that could cause constitutional issues, as in do they have the right to set new precedents in constitutional laws through federal case law.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
So now the department is admitting they posted the document prior to the jury vote.
Amazing

What a crap fest.

Well done dems
You own this

the thing with secrets in the us or uk is common law creates leaky bucket apparatus, secrets don't stay secret very long.. its a means to prevent corruption..

a reply to: Threadbare

Go take a Civics class. I'll be here when you get back. You also need to read up on this. There is a push to get this into Federal Court.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: WingDingLuey

Such as the prosecutor editing Trumps telephone call to secure a Grand jury indictment? Thats prosecutorial misconduct,and falls under a amendment violation I am sure.

Not really. The Prosecutor can do anything he wants during a Grand Jury hearing. That's how the statement "I could get a Grand Jury to indict a Ham sandwich." came about.
Now if they were to use the edited phone call during the trial, that would be different.

a reply to: JIMC5499

Te suprem court could say they got a indictment on false pretenses though. its a possible outcome.