Fanni Willis Charges Trump Before Georgia Grand Jury Vote; She’s Now Facing Potential Removal

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: WingDingLuey

The Fulton County Clerk's office put out a press release about an hour ago. Considering the potential size of indictment, the Clerk uploaded a test document to their Odyssey platform.

It was never actually published, but the media can access documents before they're made public. Someone from Reuters saw the document and assumed it was something official. However it didn't have a signed true bill or the Clerk's stamp on it.

Can they post next week's winning Powerball numbers?

Asking for a friend.

Anyone who asks for proof… I am that friend… I want the winning Powerball numbers… 🤣🤣🤣

OMG...

The EXCUSES for charging and leaking, before the Grand Jury had decided anything, are getting increasingly insane from CRAZY Fani and her office of kooks...

The Fulton County clerk of courts is putting out the third public statement trying to explain and justify why they posted the grand jury indictment of Donald Trump before the grand jury had even met to vote on the indictment. This latest explanation is so incredulous it’s almost impossible to believe they are making this public:

SEE THE LATEST EXCUSE: theconservativetreehouse.com...

..

a reply to: Klassified

Ever consider it was intentional so she would be dismissed from the $hit show they've created?

originally posted by: Mike27
a reply to: Klassified

Ever consider it was intentional so she would be dismissed from the $hit show they've created?

You could tell when Fani was reading the script written by George Soros's son last night, that her heart wasn't in this. She was following orders and the indictments were put together by the DOJ in Washington for her.

i.e. "Mr. Garland, we learned that Trump wanted some votes found. How can we indict him for that? Please send someone down here to help me with the right wording. OK?"

Said it before ill say it again, the only difference between fulton county and cook county is average temp.

This just adds more support to my opinion.

I hope for USA's sake, trump wins in 2024

MAGA

All the best

a reply to: DBCowboy

You mean they haven't already decided Trump is guilty?

This proves one of two things. Ether they have it all scripted up to the point of hanging Trump, or there was a time slip in the internet.

I don't think it was an accident. Someone realized it is all a setup and they had a moment of actual integrity. They posted the document to show it is all just a show. Now, what is going to be done about it?

originally posted by: beyondknowledge2
a reply to: DBCowboy
.

I don't think it was an accident. Someone realized it is all a setup and they had a moment of actual integrity. They posted the document to show it is all just a show. Now, what is going to be done about it?

Nothing.

Maybe some harsh language.

It's becoming clearer today, the clerk wanted to expose corruption of witch fanny Willis, so she leaked the fact that the indictments had been issued on Monday, before the jury had voted on them.

Also, two of the people scheduled to come in Tuesday to testify to the grand jury, are wondering what the hell happened?

a reply to: Klassified

Expect a lot more craziness from Democrats...from President Biden on down...while the Conservatives, US House and Supreme Court, are vacationing in exotic locations this summer.

Evil does not take much time off.

a reply to: carewemust

WHat I want to see WIllis explain is the EDITING of the phone call where it looks liek Trump is asking for fraud. They pulled a RUPAR on him. A RUPAR is when you remove or add words to a audio or video to make it look like something its not.

Scott adams exsposes willis using edited phone call

originally posted by: Klassified
So you're telling me she had her staff type up an indictment and had it signed off on by everyone who needed to sign it...before she even knew the jury would indict on all counts, and turned that in to the courthouse? Yeah, makes sense...in clown world.

You do know that in some areas the DA is the one that counts the votes of a Grand Jury? I'm pretty sure that the fix was in. Even if the Grand Jury voted not to indict, the DA was going to say that they voted to indict.

This is all a scam. Everybody knows that down the road, the USSC is going to throw this in the trashcan. Of course that's going to be in or around 2030.

a reply to: JIMC5499

This won't be going to the SCOTUS. It's a state case.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JIMC5499

This won't be going to the SCOTUS. It's a state case.

It's in violation of the Constitution.

But go ahead and cheer it on.

The cartwheels to try to explain this one. These comments are fantastic.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JIMC5499

This won't be going to the SCOTUS. It's a state case.

BS
Any case, anywhere, could go before the SC if they choose to take it and if it gets that far, they would take it.
If those fraudsters in Georgia convict him, it will get thrown out on appeal before it ever gets to the SC.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JIMC5499

This won't be going to the SCOTUS. It's a state case.

unless something unconstitutional is challenged

The U.S. Supreme Court is a federal court existing under the authority of Article III of the Constitution. It functions primarily as an appellate court, meaning a court that's authorized to review case decisions from other federal courts and from state courts. Most of what the Supreme Court does is shielded from public view, so it can be hard to understand how the Court works.

How Does the U.S. Supreme Court Work?

a reply to: WingDingLuey

Such as the prosecutor editing Trumps telephone call to secure a Grand jury indictment? Thats prosecutorial misconduct,and falls under a amendment violation I am sure.

originally posted by: Threadbare
This won't be going to the SCOTUS. It's a state case.

So, if the Supreme Court can't rule on cases that come out of states, what have they been ruling on all these years? When you deduct the 50 states that comprise America, what does that leave for the Supreme Court to rule on? Cases from Puerto Rico? American Samoa? Guam?

I'm beginning to wonder about you.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Another time saving pro-tip.

They could convict Trump before the trial.

i thought they already had isn't this about him proving his innocence not in the need to prove his guilt..

has the us totally removed the need to test this stuff out in court..

if no longer common law what is the new form of jurisprudence the us adheres to..

/sarc