It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you don't know science it sounds pretty cool. But if you know science, then you have to do things in science like define your terms. The way we have them defined right now, there is no way the laws of physics would work with more than three dimensions, if they are bigger than a proton, and we have TONS of documented evidence that support our physics models work in 3 dimensions of space and one of time. The extra dimensions in quantum mechanics or string theory that Grush referred to, if they exist, have to be smaller than a proton, so don't work for explaining aliens, which can't have any complexity if they are smaller than a proton, in fact the only things we can imagine smaller than a proton are subatomic particles.
originally posted by: Techno92LFC
a reply to: Arbitrageur
Why does inter dimensional sound like nonsense from a science perspective? That’s pretty close minded to say isn’t it?
But what about the 10 or 11 dimensions in string theory or M theory?
Pseudoscientists lean heavily on the assumption that their readers will know absolutely nothing about science or math. This is a pretty safe assumption, alas. And it requires no effort on the part of the pseudoscientist, because he also invariably knows no science or math either.
It is worth summarizing the ways in which the various concepts of "higher dimensions'' gradually diffused out from legitimate math and science, through hundreds of increasingly distorted, confused and muddled journalistic presentations and sensationalizations, into late 19th Century science fiction and 20th Century pseudoscience.
In the late 19th Century mathematicians became increasingly interested in the foundations of geometry. Our own universe has 3 space dimensions. But what would geometry be like if there were 4 space dimensions? Or 5? Or 10? Or an arbitrary number? Or an infinite number? Mathematicians worked a great deal on geometries with arbitrary numbers of space dimensions.
...
In 1915, Einstein found a more general description of gravitational phenomena, in which the density of matter directly determines the "curvature'' of 4-dimensional space-time. That is, his theory of gravity was purely geometrical. The amount of matter determines the type of geometry that exists in the surrounding space. Other matter travels along the straightest possible trajectory in this curved space-time...
The structure of all known physical laws demands that our universe have only 3 extended space dimensions. For example, the fact— established and confirmed by experiment consistently for nearly 400 years— that all long-range interactions, such as gravity and the radiation field of the electromagnetic force, fall off like the inverse square of the distance, demands that space be precisely 3 dimensional.
So those extra dimensions in string or M theory are useless for the interdimensional UFO hypothesis, since nobody is seeing UFOs smaller than 10^-35 meters in length, that's too small to see. That's 100 million trillion times smaller than a proton which is roughly 10^-15 meters.
A typical string theory had 9 or 10 space dimensions and 1 time dimension. The extra space dimensions had to be there to incorporate phenomena other than gravity geometrically, but they could not "actually'' be there or the theory would not have worked. The solution was to curl these extra dimensions up mathematically into tight "wads'' no more than 10^-35 meters in length, a process called "compaction." The extra dimensions would thus be "compact," and indetectable.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Itherael
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: spaceflyr
One, they are from somewhere far out in the universe.
Two, they are from deep within our oceans.
Three, they are inter dimensional.
One and three are definitely out.
No way the energy required for either could be generated by such small craft .
The energy of the universe generated within a 40' diameter craft ?????
Whose to say they are craft all? What if they are apertures that break into our dimension? That could explain why they appear to break the laws of known physics.
Still requires infinite energy .
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: putnam6
4 years and 40 different witnesses
I bet there are a thousand witnesses that could be interviewed about the Phoenix lights; that doesn't mean they came from outer space.
One, they are from somewhere far out in the universe.
Two, they are from deep within our oceans.
Three, they are inter dimensional.
You forgot number 4: It's in the realm of possibilities UAP's are a top secret product of our MIC.
We'll never learn the truth if we're only going to consider the 'evidence' we want to be true.
Ufology became a cult, followed by millions who wanted to believe anecdotal evidence. After being ridiculed by authorities for decades they're all jumping at the opportunity for finally being validated.
We would be wise to take a step back and consider why TPTB are now not only allowing but also supporting an ET Overlord belief system.
Why did Richard Doty lie to Paul Bennewicz? Why were we all lied to in project Serpo? Why is the US and the UK training agents on how to spread false information (this was reveled in the Snowden leaks)?
originally posted by: putnam6
It's fairly in-depth, 4 years and 40 different witnesses and they all were lying to Grusch? that in itself would suggest a disinformation campaign. Why would the DoD do this to an investigator, who by all accounts has impeccable character and scruples?
originally posted by: spaceflyr
One, they are from somewhere far out in the universe.
Two, they are from deep within our oceans.
Three, they are inter dimensional.
originally posted by: jedi_hamster
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Itherael
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: spaceflyr
One, they are from somewhere far out in the universe.
Two, they are from deep within our oceans.
Three, they are inter dimensional.
One and three are definitely out.
No way the energy required for either could be generated by such small craft .
The energy of the universe generated within a 40' diameter craft ?????
Whose to say they are craft all? What if they are apertures that break into our dimension? That could explain why they appear to break the laws of known physics.
Still requires infinite energy .
the only infinite thing is human stupidity.
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: spaceflyr
One, they are from somewhere far out in the universe.
Two, they are from deep within our oceans.
Three, they are inter dimensional.
There is a Fourth, and more likely, possibility.
Four, they're based right here in our own solar system.
Coming from a central base, what we are seeing are just "scout" ships. Did you ever see the episode of Star Trek called "For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky?" That may be a clue to what their homebase is like. That or the Death Star would be another good analogy. The ancient Sumerians talked about these ships and the "gods" that flew them. And how these "gods" created the perfect miners to dig and facilitate the gold needed for these ships to operate.
Of course it will not be revealed to the general public as to who controls these ships because it's not yet time for the public to know. These UFO hearings are all smoke and mirrors, signifying nothing.
TCB
Who knows perhaps it's all a hologram that somehow can mimic a radar signature?
Scientists have demonstrated that human genes can be controlled with electricity, a breakthrough that could pave the way toward wearable devices that program genes to perform medical interventions, reports a new study.
originally posted by: spaceflyr
I see three ideas that seem to come to the forefront;
One, they are from somewhere far out in the universe.
Two, they are from deep within our oceans.
Three, they are inter dimensional.
originally posted by: Gothmog
One and three are definitely out.
No way the energy required for either could be generated by such small craft .
The energy of the universe generated within a 40' diameter craft ?????
One and three are definitely out.
No way the energy required for either could be generated by such small craft .
A team of researchers has discovered at least two new minerals that have never before been seen on Earth in a 15 tonne meteorite found in Somalia — the ninth largest meteorite ever found.
“Whenever you find a new mineral, it means that the actual geological conditions, the chemistry of the rock, was different than what’s been found before,” says Chris Herd, a professor in the Department of Earth & Atmospheric Sciences and curator of the University of Alberta’s Meteorite Collection. “That’s what makes this exciting: In this particular meteorite you have two officially described minerals that are new to science.”
www.ualberta.ca...
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Itherael
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: spaceflyr
One, they are from somewhere far out in the universe.
Two, they are from deep within our oceans.
Three, they are inter dimensional.
One and three are definitely out.
No way the energy required for either could be generated by such small craft .
The energy of the universe generated within a 40' diameter craft ?????
Whose to say they are craft all? What if they are apertures that break into our dimension? That could explain why they appear to break the laws of known physics.
Still requires infinite energy .