You are not a transsexual.

a reply to: Grenade

It's not pseudoscience, it's just a very specific type of science. See a lot of mental and emotional issues we have are because of gender issues.
Be it unsatisfying experiences, trauma from the first love you never really got over, issues with your parents, fantasies you are ashamed of...
It's a mine field but very important. So the idea is to blow the field. Blow minds young and early and once there's less shame you can start to honestly analyse why you are who you are and find a way to deal with it without causing harm to others. Be that in the workplace, family or society in general.

Will it work? Who knows really? But this whole West Idea is built on free people free choices. So if you are already tolerant and working on your own issues, fine carry on.
Is the whole thing over the top for most people? Sure, but people need to be free. Let them be.
What's the difference really if I say he or she or they? Unless your identity is unnecessary bound to your gender.

I Am MAN! Is that the problem, that you built your personality around what other men do?
Because if so: you suffer from the same issue as those poor souls trying to be what they'll never become, instead of being you - being man or woman or whatever is the trap.

a reply to: Peeple

My argument is based on the scientific principles of biology and procreation. I have no issues with people who want to identify whatever way they like, just don’t conflate this new social construct of gender ideology with basic biology and it’s all good.

I’m a man not because of my behaviour, but because I have testicles that produce sperm and my cells have a Y chromosome. If I want to pass down my DNA to a child then I need to unite my haploid gametes with a woman who produces ovum. The terms male and female, man and woman, are derived and based on this process. That’s the biology and it can’t be changed by feelings.

a reply to: Grenade

Yeah well biology and psychology go hand in hand, you know? You can't look at a human and human issues without considering the psyche.

That's part of where modern medicine went wrong too.
It used to be that a patient showed up and just seeing a doctor was enough to feel better.
Now we have a situation of deep mistrust on both sides. Society is very sick.
But in general not individuals are the problem that needs solving.
You can only fix society if you go out looking for the root.
And that's weirdly: The Field
between the individuals, the interaction space.
So I like my contribution to be holistic and unifying.
Those poor souls are also just people trying to figure out how to be happy.

a reply to: Peeple

Biology doesn’t consider feelings.

a reply to: Grenade

stomac ulcer. pain in neck and shoulders.
most of the time caused by the psyche acting on the body.

Are you trying to tell me your psychology, your lifestyle decisions if you will, is totally disconnected from how well your body is doing?

a reply to: Peeple

No, I’m not claiming that at all. I’m saying that DNA determines biological sex and nothing can change the cellular makeup of your body. The terms male and female have been co-opted from biology and are being used to confuse people. No lifestyle decision will ever effect chromosomes.

a reply to: Grenade

That's why they're transitioning.

a reply to: Peeple

What does that even mean?

a reply to: Grenade

They transition from being born fe/ma to the opposite via plastic surgery and hormone therapy

a reply to: Peeple

I just explained why that’s impossible?

a reply to: Grenade

that's why the magic* happens in the words "surgical and therapy"

*different magic than my magic in me identifying as magicsexual... because I said earlier I think the problem is in focusing too much on what you want to be rather than being who you are, but that's not a trans specific issue that'd be humanity in general

originally posted by: yuppa
And bones as I have linked before are not a reliable indicator half of the time. Some men have wide hips.
Hormones on a teenager undergoing puberty can also alter bone structure.
MOdern archaologist have also gotten sex of a body wrong numerous times.

There is a lot of science out there that disagrees with you in regards to determining sex via bones:

National Library of Medicine
Live Science
Determining Sex from Cremated Remains
Identify Gender by Skull

I could post more, but that should suffice I hope.

Indeed, if you only have a few bones, then determining sex can be a guesstimate only, but with a whole or majority of a skeleton? or even the important tale-tell pieces? The rates are incredibly high, but in reality, no one gets it right 100% of the time - there are always factors that can mislead or simple human error.

But to say under 50%? That flies in the face of documented accuracy and evidence in the field of forensic anthropology, not just archeology.

Yes, there are professionals out there that claim you can't determine sex by a skeleton, I found those articles to and have read them as well. The problem is, you can always find people who will dispute well documented facts to support someone agenda. These articles make it clear their agenda is to muddy the waters to try and convince you there are no differences between male and female skeletons. They are light on facts that actually dispute all the opposing documents and evidence.

I've seen youtube videos of professors claiming the same thing - that there are no differences between males and females. But those claims fly false in the light of reality. The differences are well documented and even ancient people knew the differences between men and women.

And since this IS a conspiracy site, let me add:

I get this is all inconvenient in the current climate, it doesn't support the popular agenda being pushed in our culture right now. They are going through the playbook, page by page to destabilize society, undermine science, weak morals and ethics, destroy religion and keep us fighting amongst ourselves while those who are in charge gather more power and advance their goals.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: yuppa

Girls don’t have penises.

If you find guys who dress up in girls clothes attractive then you’re a homosexual and in denial of the fact. You don’t need to create all this melodramatic garbage in order to be accepted, just admit to yourself that you’re gay.

We don’t hate on people for their sexual preference, we hate on those feeding children with nonsensical unscientific garbage in order to legitimise their sexual fantasies. Or men who want to trash womens rights just to pander to their feelings and desires.

The intricacies of sexual fetish and normalisation of mental illness shouldn’t be taught to children in schools.

As you said, you can’t help what’s going on in your mind. That’s the only place any of this makes sense, hence I’ve said repeatedly this is a psychological condition that should be treated as such. You have the audacity to criticise others for not bending to your will. You’re right about one thing, we don’t understand your position. That’s likely because we’re not the ones suffering from mental illness. I don’t speak or understand crazy, sorry.

You would be surprised what some people call 'girls' in our days.

originally posted by: Thanatos0042

originally posted by: yuppa
And bones as I have linked before are not a reliable indicator half of the time. Some men have wide hips.
Hormones on a teenager undergoing puberty can also alter bone structure.
MOdern archaologist have also gotten sex of a body wrong numerous times.

There is a lot of science out there that disagrees with you in regards to determining sex via bones:

National Library of Medicine
Live Science
Determining Sex from Cremated Remains
Identify Gender by Skull

I could post more, but that should suffice I hope.

Indeed, if you only have a few bones, then determining sex can be a guesstimate only, but with a whole or majority of a skeleton? or even the important tale-tell pieces? The rates are incredibly high, but in reality, no one gets it right 100% of the time - there are always factors that can mislead or simple human error.

But to say under 50%? That flies in the face of documented accuracy and evidence in the field of forensic anthropology, not just archeology.

Yes, there are professionals out there that claim you can't determine sex by a skeleton, I found those articles to and have read them as well. The problem is, you can always find people who will dispute well documented facts to support someone agenda. These articles make it clear their agenda is to muddy the waters to try and convince you there are no differences between male and female skeletons. They are light on facts that actually dispute all the opposing documents and evidence.

I've seen youtube videos of professors claiming the same thing - that there are no differences between males and females. But those claims fly false in the light of reality. The differences are well documented and even ancient people knew the differences between men and women.

And since this IS a conspiracy site, let me add:

I get this is all inconvenient in the current climate, it doesn't support the popular agenda being pushed in our culture right now. They are going through the playbook, page by page to destabilize society, undermine science, weak morals and ethics, destroy religion and keep us fighting amongst ourselves while those who are in charge gather more power and advance their goals.

I wonder what kind of professionals are they! Have come across one anthropologist who made similar claims but it was refuted by everyone else.

I don't know why the conversation evolves into this sort of matters. Those who have an agenda little they care about facts but cherry pick and take out of context bits that suit their arguments.

How desperate someone is to argue you can't know the sex of a person looking at their bones in a n effort to argue in a broader context sex can't be determined easily.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Grenade

stomac ulcer. pain in neck and shoulders.
most of the time caused by the psyche acting on the body.

Are you trying to tell me your psychology, your lifestyle decisions if you will, is totally disconnected from how well your body is doing?

Psyche doctors are called psychiatrist

originally posted by: AlienBorg

I wonder what kind of professionals are they! Have come across one anthropologist who made similar claims but it was refuted by everyone else.

I don't know why the conversation evolves into this sort of matters. Those who have an agenda little they care about facts but cherry pick and take out of context bits that suit their arguments.

How desperate someone is to argue you can't know the sex of a person looking at their bones in a n effort to argue in a broader context sex can't be determined easily.

Well, they are the kind of professionals that have pretty initials after their names lol

It' s just like a case in court - each side buys experts whose job it is to refute the other sides experts. One side is always more credible than the other side though.

And you are likely right about the conversation and cherry picking.

You summed that last bit up quite nicely. I can "get" a lot of things about the movement and the agenda and that there are real people and feelings involved, but when it comes to reality conflicting with the belief of how they want things to be, it really boggles my brain they try to distort all of reality.

Swing and a miss! Who are you to define someone’s preference based on what you can visually see?

originally posted by: Poofmander
a reply to: Grenade

Having a child and bringing them to term and raising a family is a statement about your sexual preference, because it fits in the norm you're okay with it but it's still sexualizes girls and boys. It just sexualizes them in the way you accept as truth. You think all children do not understand how babies are made at least in some effect?

Also if you believe removing all sexual education from those who have not yet reached the age of 18 literally will cause sexual chaos where children who have urges will not understand how to do things properly and end up in situations where perhaps they didn't want to.

Because if we need to keep all sexual preference in the bedroom then you cannot speak about a man and a woman raising a family because that is a sexual preference, just one of many I know a very popular one albeit but just because it's the most popular doesn't mean it gets a pass.

originally posted by: linda72

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: linda72

No human hermaphrodites ever existed on this planet--
To be a hermaphrodite you must have the repoductive organs of both sexes-- as a result you can get pregnant and be able to impregnate other humans-

Is this sarcasm?
..because it is false

Hermaphrodites are not all that uncommon
Hermaphrodites with both packages fully functional is very rare, but do exist.
I know a kid right now. She has testicles inside and the other part is normal.
The doctor says she won't be able to reproduce normally as an adult.
Hermaphrodites are in a bunch of weirdo porn too...someone said..lol

I find the topic interesting. Is it more than a birth defect ?
Or could it be an adaptation?

I don't know myself if this is sarcasm--
Can you name one human hermaphrodite--
The clue is in what you've written-- 'won't be able to reproduce normally as an adult'

A hermaphrodite is a person who can get pregnant-- and be able to impregnate others--
There is no human with these properties--

study.com...

People are not hermaphrodites. Due to inadequate levels of testosterone while in the womb or the lack of certain enzymes during puberty, humans can be intersex individuals. Intersex individuals have external genitalia that do not match the sex of their internal reproductive system. It is rare, however, for this sex development disorder to occur among humans. And although some intersex adults can have children of their own following reconstructive surgery, other intersex adults are infertile.

You're confusing a genetic-developmental disorder (intersex)-- with hermaphroditism--

Based

originally posted by: linda72

originally posted by: MrInquisitive

originally posted by: linda72

originally posted by: QwertyMyself
There is no such thing.

You were born a male or a female.

Very few are hermaphrodite.



When you are long dead and they find your remains, they will know you as a male or a female.

Why do you seek to redefine yourself as something else?

You were born perfect.

It takes a lifetime to get to know oneself.

Why do you reject what you are in order to identify as something other than what you were born as?


And for those who are members of this prideful group whose name is riddled with meaningless letters, why do you demand acceptance for something you know is off-putting to many?

Understand their comfort in the norm.

Do not push your oddity unto them demanding acceptance, then act surprised at backlash.

Physically altering your body with surgery or chemical injections is not the answer you seek.

It will not bring you the peace you seek.

Only knowing and accepting yourself as you are will.


This is not a reproach.

I am simply expressing myself.

I do not understand this modern movement.


I am concerned for the young who may be fooled into this mindset by the colorful parades and claims of "love and acceptance" when they display quite the contrary.


Edit: I may have meant transgender. I see no difference. I admit I am ill informed on the matter as I consider the whole thing to be of little value.

No human hermaphrodites ever existed on this planet--
To be a hermaphrodite you must have the repoductive organs of both sexes-- as a result you can get pregnant and be able to impregnate other humans-

You made a completely false claim. There are too human hermaphrodites.

We used to call them hermaphrodites

And even a person of one gender or the other, who has reproductive organs, might not be able to produce offspring. You have heard of infertility problems, I trust.

I don't think so--
Human hermaphodites don't exist-- we used to call them hermaphodites but it was wrong--
Intersex is the name given-- this is a serious medical condition-genetic developmental disorder--

my.clevelandclinic.org...#:~:text=No.,that%20term%20derogatory%20and%20stigmatizing.

Is a person who is intersex a hermaphrodite?

No. Hermaphrodites don’t exist. That is an outdated term implying that a person is both fully male and fully female, which isn’t biologically possible. In fact, many people who are intersex consider that term derogatory and stigmatizing. Intersex and being intersex are the correct terms.

You don't know what you're talking about--

It's getting so bizarre when ideologues try to argue there are human hermaphrodites and believe it has something to do with transgenderism. Everyone who studied basic biology at school knows there are no human hermaphrodites. What's next? Flying horses like pegasus?

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: yuppa

You’ll need to be more specific. Please point out anything I’ve said which isn’t backed by objective reality.

Unfortunately for you, the facts are on my side when applying logic.

You wont listen why try?