You are not a transsexual.

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: linda72

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: linda72

No human hermaphrodites ever existed on this planet--
To be a hermaphrodite you must have the repoductive organs of both sexes-- as a result you can get pregnant and be able to impregnate other humans-

Is this sarcasm?
..because it is false

Hermaphrodites are not all that uncommon
Hermaphrodites with both packages fully functional is very rare, but do exist.
I know a kid right now. She has testicles inside and the other part is normal.
The doctor says she won't be able to reproduce normally as an adult.
Hermaphrodites are in a bunch of weirdo porn too...someone said..lol

I find the topic interesting. Is it more than a birth defect ?
Or could it be an adaptation?

I don't know myself if this is sarcasm--
Can you name one human hermaphrodite--
The clue is in what you've written-- 'won't be able to reproduce normally as an adult'

A hermaphrodite is a person who can get pregnant-- and be able to impregnate others--
There is no human with these properties--

study.com...

People are not hermaphrodites. Due to inadequate levels of testosterone while in the womb or the lack of certain enzymes during puberty, humans can be intersex individuals. Intersex individuals have external genitalia that do not match the sex of their internal reproductive system. It is rare, however, for this sex development disorder to occur among humans. And although some intersex adults can have children of their own following reconstructive surgery, other intersex adults are infertile.

You're confusing a genetic-developmental disorder (intersex)-- with hermaphroditism--

Based

Based. this isnt 4 chan. Another one who refuses to listen or have a open mind.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: linda72

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: linda72

No human hermaphrodites ever existed on this planet--
To be a hermaphrodite you must have the repoductive organs of both sexes-- as a result you can get pregnant and be able to impregnate other humans-

Is this sarcasm?
..because it is false

Hermaphrodites are not all that uncommon
Hermaphrodites with both packages fully functional is very rare, but do exist.
I know a kid right now. She has testicles inside and the other part is normal.
The doctor says she won't be able to reproduce normally as an adult.
Hermaphrodites are in a bunch of weirdo porn too...someone said..lol

I find the topic interesting. Is it more than a birth defect ?
Or could it be an adaptation?

I don't know myself if this is sarcasm--
Can you name one human hermaphrodite--
The clue is in what you've written-- 'won't be able to reproduce normally as an adult'

A hermaphrodite is a person who can get pregnant-- and be able to impregnate others--
There is no human with these properties--

study.com...

People are not hermaphrodites. Due to inadequate levels of testosterone while in the womb or the lack of certain enzymes during puberty, humans can be intersex individuals. Intersex individuals have external genitalia that do not match the sex of their internal reproductive system. It is rare, however, for this sex development disorder to occur among humans. And although some intersex adults can have children of their own following reconstructive surgery, other intersex adults are infertile.

You're confusing a genetic-developmental disorder (intersex)-- with hermaphroditism--

Based

Based. this isnt 4 chan. Another one who refuses to listen or have a open mind.

I do listen to what others have to say.
But I reject the transgender ideology and propaganda.

a reply to: Peeple

Another hole in the plot of the Trans ideology is that a man can never claim to know that they feel like a woman and vice versa. Since we aren't capable of actual sex change as a species, its simply not even possible to know how the other gender 'feels to be.'

a reply to: QwertyMyself

Paint brush in hand, painting everyone how you want it to be. That paint is black, so you can't see.

a reply to: AlienBorg

And when I talk about it I say to not force people or anything into it. So how is that pushing the idea or propaganda? Ive even said the people like me the majority of us do not even try to say changing our outward appereances changed our genetics.
As to the bone studies there are ones to counter as many to support the topic or hormones altering bone structures if given during the growth years. Professional athropoloigist normally have a 3/4th guess rate in determining sex accurately. thats still not perfect.Even they will say they guess and get it wrong quite a bit.
I refuse to accept we let kids who are not legal 18 year old adults undergo hormones. therapy and counseling yes though. SO I guess im a exception to most of the trans rights movement. We dont need special treatment,just let us alone.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: AlienBorg

As to the bone studies there are ones to counter as many to support the topic or hormones altering bone structures if given during the growth years.

No, they don't really "counter" decades of documented evidence that has supporting physical evidence behind it. There are some studies with theories that oppose established science. I've read a number of these studies and they have a easy to see bias where they start from "there's no difference, you can't tell" and work backwards and include a lot of extraneous information that really has no bearing on the issue in attempts to show they don't have a theory to prove, that what they have is fact.

Professional athropoloigist normally have a 3/4th guess rate in determining sex accurately. thats still not perfect.Even they will say they guess and get it wrong quite a bit.

And again, that's not exactly true. While it is true some bones are harder to determine sex from that other bones, they are plenty of bones that exceed 90% success rates. Many of the articles I posted showed why and the general success rates. They are not guessing either, they are following a proven scientific method to determine results, if it was all guesswork than it would have collapsed as a profession long ago.

Determining sex from bones doesn't have to be perfect to be a solid science, otherwise we'd have do throw out medicine as a solid science since doctors get diagnoses wrong and get rid of many other sciences and most things, since nothing is ever perfect. Nor do they say, they get it wrong quite a bit either - that would be entirely counterintuitive to their whole profession and undermine it.

If any anthropological professional said that, it would entirely undermine their career as a professional and in all my years of dealing with professionals, none have ever said anything of that kind. Though, I am sure someone could find someone enough incompetent who would say something like that.

I understand the whole bone thing is an issue for people who adhere to the narrative that there is no difference between men and women, but objective fact on this and many other details have existed a long time.

For a new theory to take root and change science, people are going to have to work it through the scientific method from start to finish, with no emotion, no bias and prove it with objective fact, step-by-step and refuting the decades of documented science on it. I've yet to ever read a document about it that can do that.

And don't get me wrong - I'm all about science changing and advancing and old facts being disproven as our technology advances. So I'm not on the side that says nothing I was taught can ever change. But to do that, it has to be done right, and it's not.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: AlienBorg

And when I talk about it I say to not force people or anything into it. So how is that pushing the idea or propaganda? Ive even said the people like me the majority of us do not even try to say changing our outward appereances changed our genetics.
As to the bone studies there are ones to counter as many to support the topic or hormones altering bone structures if given during the growth years. Professional athropoloigist normally have a 3/4th guess rate in determining sex accurately. thats still not perfect.Even they will say they guess and get it wrong quite a bit.
I refuse to accept we let kids who are not legal 18 year old adults undergo hormones. therapy and counseling yes though. SO I guess im a exception to most of the trans rights movement. We dont need special treatment,just let us alone.

If you can find any studies supporting what you've claiming then I will be really surprised how sex can change through hormones and surgeries.

Btw what is the number of sexes and can humans transition between sexes?

a reply to: Thanatos0042

Take note on how Yuppa is trying to argue it's difficult to determine sex by looking at the bones of a person. As if this is true or relevant to the conversation.

It's incredible at what lengths people can go to argue sex is difficult to determine or sex is fluid because there are new ideas on the field. The reality is there is nothing more than what we already know but a influx of political activism in science trying hard to argue in favour of transgenderism by denying basic facts.

originally posted by: AlienBorg
a reply to: Thanatos0042

Take note on how Yuppa is trying to argue it's difficult to determine sex by looking at the bones of a person. As if this is true or relevant to the conversation.

It's incredible at what lengths people can go to argue sex is difficult to determine or sex is fluid because there are new ideas on the field. The reality is there is nothing more than what we already know but a influx of political activism in science trying hard to argue in favour of transgenderism by denying basic facts.

I did note that actually. I also noted it went from under 50% on the prior post to 3/4 in this one for accuracy. Then followed by many misstatements that no professional would ever utter unless they wanted career suicide.

But yes, I noticed the offhand conclusion within the post.

That is correct - and this political activism has invaded the science sector to the point where it's easy to find people to get on board with the filmiest of evidence to support the push, because otherwise the my be blackballed by the power people pushing the agenda.

and as I said, I am perfectly okay with new scientific concepts being introduced to challenge the old concepts, but they need to be done in the same, unbiased way as the previous studies to prove their points. But the one thing I've noticed is that this movement to eliminate sex/gender is anything but unbiased.

a reply to: Thanatos0042

Ive posted th elinks before. Im done reposting again an dagain trying to say science is changing because people who drag their knuckles refuse to entertain their might be something to it. How bout snap your fingers.

a reply to: AlienBorg

Its hard to remember numbers when reposting the same crap time after time. SHeesh. i linked it in previous pages,but sure act like it dont exist.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: AlienBorg

Its hard to remember numbers when reposting the same crap time after time. SHeesh. i linked it in previous pages,but sure act like it dont exist.

Science hasn't changed btw. Nothing is new and transexualism is just an ideology. Nobody can transition between the two sexes.

originally posted by: yuppa
a reply to: Thanatos0042

Ive posted th elinks before. Im done reposting again an dagain trying to say science is changing because people who drag their knuckles refuse to entertain their might be something to it. How bout snap your fingers.

You don't need to repost your links - before I ever made my first post, I did my due diligence and looked at opposing views from links.

In my above post I've stated opinion about them. I do not see science changing from the links you posted, they lack unbiased views, followed by reports that don't seem to acknowledge known things like muscle attachment point differences between where male and female bones, or the thickness of some bones like the skull where women's are thinner and again, the differences found in the pelvis bones.

This isn't about people who are dragging the knuckles in changing science. This is about a lack of objective empirical evidence that is not shown to refute what has been solid, documented science for decades. I've seen forensic anthropologists rebuild skeletons and determine their sex - on point, every time and artists rebuild the faces out of clay and even they get the general look right, so they can try to find who the missing people are.

And these were not people guessing, these were people who figured everything out using proven methodologies. The only agendas these people had were giving faces/voices to the missing.

double post

Life is like a box of chocolates.