It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mirza2003
abrams is vulnerable to sabot shell i see one abrams pic in which sabot rauond pierced in to compartmeant[in iraqi] destroyed by USA becuse tank is neutrlize by enmay attack and unmovable.
Originally posted by WestPoint52And mirza can I see a picture of that Abrams or am I supposed to take your word for it?
Originally posted by Daedalus3
BHAI BHAI.. not "bye bye"!!!
Originally posted by Taishyou
Originally posted by mirza2003
abrams is vulnerable to sabot shell i see one abrams pic in which sabot rauond pierced in to compartmeant[in iraqi] destroyed by USA becuse tank is neutrlize by enmay attack and unmovable.
Originally posted by WestPoint52And mirza can I see a picture of that Abrams or am I supposed to take your word for it?
Oh I think he was talking about that "mystery projectile" that went almost right through the Abrams. It was discussed somewhere on ATS when it happened a while ago in Iraq. The "mystery projectile" turned out to be a Russian made AT-14 Kornet E
Here's the thread
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 29-4-2005 by Taishyou]
Originally posted by Taishyou
Originally posted by mirza2003
abrams is vulnerable to sabot shell i see one abrams pic in which sabot rauond pierced in to compartmeant[in iraqi] destroyed by USA becuse tank is neutrlize by enmay attack and unmovable.
Originally posted by WestPoint52And mirza can I see a picture of that Abrams or am I supposed to take your word for it?
Oh I think he was talking about that "mystery projectile" that went almost right through the Abrams. It was discussed somewhere on ATS when it happened a while ago in Iraq. The "mystery projectile" turned out to be a Russian made AT-14 Kornet E
Here's the thread
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 29-4-2005 by Taishyou]
To accommodate more equipment and rounds, the Type 98's turret is slightly larger than that of the Type 90, which has resulted in a gap between turret and the hull in the front. This is a major disadvantage in the battle as the whole turret might be blown off if the gap is hit.
In addition, the Type 98 also lacks designs often found on Western MBTs to minimise the damage in the event of penetration by a HEAT projectile. For example, the armour bulkheads to separate the crew compartment from the fuel tanks and rounds, as well as the top panels designed to blow outwards in case of explosion. This could lead to low survivability in modern combat field according to the experience of the 1991 Gulf War.
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
The Type-98 was also plagued siverely by all kinds of problems relating to its aoptics, fire control, engine and numerous technical difficulties. But none of this was doucmented by the Chinese media because of the totalitarian, brutal regime that controls it.
Originally posted by W4rl0rD.
How did we know all the facts about the Type 98 and the design faults? Did the webmaster take a look at it and analyze the tank before writing down the design faults? Again, if we know the faults of the tank, it would be better as we would now go and correct the faults on the tank.
All these statements coming from a kid means nothing. Grow up, little kid.