It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In fact, if there's anything I try to avoid, it's a flame war. I'll show more restraint and ignore the ignorant ones from now on.
Originally posted by sweatmonicaIdo
I apologize, I wasn't trying to spin off into a flame war. In fact, if there's anything I try to avoid, it's a flame war. I'll show more restraint and ignore the ignorant ones from now on.
Originally posted by rogue1
Please, how transparent can you be - you're still trying to piss people off
Anyway, back to the thread. As ar as tank superority goes any modern tank can kill another, it all depends on the situation of the battle. An Indian sabot round would be able to penetrate the Abrams except from the front, it's turruet side armour may also stand up to a single direct hit - everywhere else is vulnerable though.
Originally posted by mirza2003
it is not the post to discuss chines tank tec there is another post
be on your topic discusing anything other than the topic should be small
china white has habit to take any post to chines tech and start compring withit witout full knowlege he has some pic to compare unproven data.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
sweatmonic WTF is your problem? I don't give a... what you say. china white seems to think that the Type-98 can stand up to the M1A2 or M1A1 which I find very funny.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
hehe...
sweatmonicaido don't like westpoint23..
mirza2003 don't like chinawhite..
This thread is going nowhere fast..
Originally posted by rogue1
Possibly, however the main problem with Iraqi armour was the way it was deployed. Many of their tanks were just used as pillboxes in the billiard table terrain of the Iraqi desert. Airpower is what really broke the back of the Iraqi armoured forces; that and the far superior US vision sytems and tactics, especially at night.
It is highly doubtful that even Soviet ammo would have been able to pierce the frontal armour of an Abrams. Don't forget that is what they were built for a frontal slugging match.
Originally posted by mirza2003
rather than posting full details of type xx here you can post it in type xx thread and give link here that will server good purpose.
about t-72 in gulf war i think tank shell is mainstay of the tank duels and t-72 is badly eqiuped.
is any body had details of what kind of shell t-72 and m1a1 had in that war.
Originally posted by chinawhite
arab armies have never had any luck in using modern warfare. the iraqi tank guns were downgraded versions of there russian counter-part. during the iran-iraq war iraq found out they could make there own ammo and it worked againest the iranian armour. if they imported russian ammo for there guns we would have seen more dead m1a2
Originally posted by rogue1
Originally posted by chinawhite
arab armies have never had any luck in using modern warfare. the iraqi tank guns were downgraded versions of there russian counter-part. during the iran-iraq war iraq found out they could make there own ammo and it worked againest the iranian armour. if they imported russian ammo for there guns we would have seen more dead m1a2
The tank guns were no different, I believe you mean the ammo. There may have been a few more M!'a disabled maybe 5-10 but no more. The big tank engagements like 73 Easting were fought at night, where the Americans could run rings around the Iraqi tanks.
Not to mention of course that the tanks were tin cans, even a T-72 is lightly armoured compared to an Abrams.
Saddam also had some of that Chinese junk, Type 59's, I believe.
Originally posted by rogue1
Possibly, however the main problem with Iraqi armour was the way it was deployed. Many of their tanks were just used as pillboxes in the billiard table terrain of the Iraqi desert. Airpower is what really broke the back of the Iraqi armoured forces; that and the far superior US vision sytems and tactics, especially at night.
It is highly doubtful that even Soviet ammo would have been able to pierce the frontal armour of an Abrams. Don't forget that is what they were built for a frontal slugging match.
Originally posted by rogue1
Not to mention of course that the tanks were tin cans, even a T-72 is lightly armoured compared to an Abrams.
Saddam also had some of that Chinese junk, Type 59's, I believe.
Originally posted by chinawhite
ALso india has the worlds largest number of people under poverty line all 250+ million.
also the LCA is under development not developed.
Anyone could work on hyperplanes its if you finish the project that matters
any source to 3rd largest GDP in 10 years
Originally posted by Lucretius
Details are scarce but this could be the chinese "super tank" that Janes Defence refered to back in 2003
If rumors are correct it will be the most powerfull armoured vehicle on the planet