The moment the trans agenda goes off the rails thread

Not even one example of any damage.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.

How can I refute what you didn't even give?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.[/]?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

It’s generally reserved for somebody or something that goes round and round with circular logic, keeps saying things so generic and general that that they can just be repeated forever, offers purely annoying garbage like “I ain’t never heard of that “ and “prove it” for things we’ve all seen 100 times.
Ya know …. You. And several others, just so you don’t feel picked on.
At least you stumbled into a few egregious falsehoods, so maybe this makes you appear a little more human.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.

How can I refute what you didn't even give?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

Kitten, use Google, I know you know how.

Research before you post.

It'll make you look less stupid.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.

How can I refute what you didn't even give?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

Kitten, use Google, I know you know how.

Research before you post.

It'll make you look less stupid.

I have done research. If you want to talk about the *potential* damages, we can do that. We can discuss the possible side effects of therapies.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.

How can I refute what you didn't even give?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

Kitten, use Google, I know you know how.

Research before you post.

It'll make you look less stupid.

I have done research. If you want to talk about the *potential* damages, we can do that. We can discuss the possible side effects of therapies.

You're that Reddit meme guy with no clue, aren't you.

lol

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.

How can I refute what you didn't even give?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

Kitten, use Google, I know you know how.

Research before you post.

It'll make you look less stupid.

I have done research. If you want to talk about the *potential* damages, we can do that. We can discuss the possible side effects of therapies.

You're that Reddit meme guy with no clue, aren't you.

lol

Nah I am a 4chan guy.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.

How can I refute what you didn't even give?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

Kitten, use Google, I know you know how.

Research before you post.

It'll make you look less stupid.

I have done research. If you want to talk about the *potential* damages, we can do that. We can discuss the possible side effects of therapies.

You're that Reddit meme guy with no clue, aren't you.

lol

Nah I am a 4chan guy.

Ew.

'Kay.

Still you have no argument.

I actually provided science and you can provide nothing.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Yeah, 'cause science is like, um, no evidence dood.

Fail.

You're either a troll or a bot.

Refute what I said with science or admit that you don't have a clue.

How can I refute what you didn't even give?

Why call me a bot or a troll? Is that your standard fare to call someone that when someone wouldn't agree with you?

Kitten, use Google, I know you know how.

Research before you post.

It'll make you look less stupid.

I have done research. If you want to talk about the *potential* damages, we can do that. We can discuss the possible side effects of therapies.

You're that Reddit meme guy with no clue, aren't you.

lol

Nah I am a 4chan guy.

Ew.

'Kay.

Still you have no argument.

I actually provided science and you can provide nothing.

You provided a teaching lesson that you taught in a science class. You literally compared underdeveloped frogs to teenagers.

a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

Didn't you dismiss that woman with genuine expertise?

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

Didn't you dismiss that woman with genuine expertise?

Yes because there was no study referenced.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

Didn't you dismiss that woman with genuine expertise?

Yes because there was no study referenced.

LOL. That's hilarious because you haven't referenced any study yourself.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

Didn't you dismiss that woman with genuine expertise?

Yes because there was no study referenced.

LOL. That's hilarious because you haven't referenced any study yourself.

I'll type this slow so you can understand

Do you know how to Google?

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

Didn't you dismiss that woman with genuine expertise?

Yes because there was no study referenced.

LOL. That's hilarious because you haven't referenced any study yourself.

You can’t reverse genetics. Hormone therapy or not.

Your code is written.

originally posted by: wdkirk

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

Didn't you dismiss that woman with genuine expertise?

Yes because there was no study referenced.

LOL. That's hilarious because you haven't referenced any study yourself.

You can’t reverse genetics. Hormone therapy or not.

Your code is written.

I know that. Not sure why you tell me this.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ABlackCat

Then show me a scietific study that illustrates how hormonal changes at certain developmental stages can be reversed.

Please.

Do it.

Show me how I'm wrong.

Now.

Chop-Chop

Do it.

Didn't you dismiss that woman with genuine expertise?

Yes because there was no study referenced.

LOL. That's hilarious because you haven't referenced any study yourself.

I'll type this slow so you can understand

Do you know how to Google?

Hey since you apparently are too lazy, I'll help you, Cowboy.

Do you know how to Google?

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

The people who decide to 'transition' don't have these generic conditions.

I know that. My point is that there are variants. People are just born differently.

A transgender person is born with a brain/mind of the opposite gender (which can be verified scientifically).

Do you know what an intersex person is?

You seem to be confusing genetic and chromosomal disorders with transgenderism when in fact they have nothing to do with each other.

You seem to miss the part where I said it can be verified scientifically.

Are you trying to avoid my question about intersex people? If so, why?

I am not quite sure why you brought XXY into this conversation.

The point is the variance of sexes and genders that are inborn. The transgender children do not get the ideas out of random.

Intersex is another DSD and again has nothing to do with transgenderism. I am not quite what did you bring this up.

Humor me and answer my question as it seems that you are missing my point.

However the trans movement somehow tries desperately to include these conditions and make links to transgenderism. It isn't going to happen.

I am not trying to make any "link". It's a simple question.

If a child is born intersex, which sex/gender is it? Who gets to decide?

Intersex is another DSD (already mentioned it in my last reply) and the sex of an intersex baby is determined (as always) by its chromosomes.

An example is Caster Semenya who is a genetically a male although taking part in women's competitions and that's why he is winning so many medals. Again, intersex has nothing to do with transgenderism.

Nobody decides, sec is predetermined long before you were born. Sex is not 'assigned' at birth is observed and it's a biological reality not an opinion by someone.

There are no variance of sexes. Sex is binary.

Everything you have said is wrong.

The trans movent is trying hard to include intersex conditions but they can't. They always fail.

I am not sure if you understand what intersex is.

Again, gender identities can be verified scientifically.

If you have seen from my posts it's very clear who understands what intersex is and who doesn't.

Gender identity isn't a scientific term but a made up expression which is meaningless. Gender isn't an identify you can choose.

Only the fact you brought up XXY and intersex conditions into the conversation proves the trans movement has nothing to hold on to and tries to integrate to the movement disorders of sex development, although they have nothing to do with transgenderism or the identities you have discussed.

My example of Caster Semenya it's a really good one if you want to understand intersex conditions. These are not sex variants btw. Sex is either male or female.

Again, who gets to decide the gender of an intersex child?

Here you go.


Intersex at birth? Intersex child?

Puberty. For one will decide.

Genetics were already determined

originally posted by: wdkirk

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

The people who decide to 'transition' don't have these generic conditions.

I know that. My point is that there are variants. People are just born differently.

A transgender person is born with a brain/mind of the opposite gender (which can be verified scientifically).

Do you know what an intersex person is?

You seem to be confusing genetic and chromosomal disorders with transgenderism when in fact they have nothing to do with each other.

You seem to miss the part where I said it can be verified scientifically.

Are you trying to avoid my question about intersex people? If so, why?

I am not quite sure why you brought XXY into this conversation.

The point is the variance of sexes and genders that are inborn. The transgender children do not get the ideas out of random.

Intersex is another DSD and again has nothing to do with transgenderism. I am not quite what did you bring this up.

Humor me and answer my question as it seems that you are missing my point.

However the trans movement somehow tries desperately to include these conditions and make links to transgenderism. It isn't going to happen.

I am not trying to make any "link". It's a simple question.

If a child is born intersex, which sex/gender is it? Who gets to decide?

Intersex is another DSD (already mentioned it in my last reply) and the sex of an intersex baby is determined (as always) by its chromosomes.

An example is Caster Semenya who is a genetically a male although taking part in women's competitions and that's why he is winning so many medals. Again, intersex has nothing to do with transgenderism.

Nobody decides, sec is predetermined long before you were born. Sex is not 'assigned' at birth is observed and it's a biological reality not an opinion by someone.

There are no variance of sexes. Sex is binary.

Everything you have said is wrong.

The trans movent is trying hard to include intersex conditions but they can't. They always fail.

I am not sure if you understand what intersex is.

Again, gender identities can be verified scientifically.

If you have seen from my posts it's very clear who understands what intersex is and who doesn't.

Gender identity isn't a scientific term but a made up expression which is meaningless. Gender isn't an identify you can choose.

Only the fact you brought up XXY and intersex conditions into the conversation proves the trans movement has nothing to hold on to and tries to integrate to the movement disorders of sex development, although they have nothing to do with transgenderism or the identities you have discussed.

My example of Caster Semenya it's a really good one if you want to understand intersex conditions. These are not sex variants btw. Sex is either male or female.

Again, who gets to decide the gender of an intersex child?

Here you go.


Intersex at birth? Intersex child?

Puberty. For one will decide.

Genetics were already determined

Intersex people have parts of both sexes.

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: wdkirk

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

originally posted by: ABlackCat

originally posted by: AlienBorg

The people who decide to 'transition' don't have these generic conditions.

I know that. My point is that there are variants. People are just born differently.

A transgender person is born with a brain/mind of the opposite gender (which can be verified scientifically).

Do you know what an intersex person is?

You seem to be confusing genetic and chromosomal disorders with transgenderism when in fact they have nothing to do with each other.

You seem to miss the part where I said it can be verified scientifically.

Are you trying to avoid my question about intersex people? If so, why?

I am not quite sure why you brought XXY into this conversation.

The point is the variance of sexes and genders that are inborn. The transgender children do not get the ideas out of random.

Intersex is another DSD and again has nothing to do with transgenderism. I am not quite what did you bring this up.

Humor me and answer my question as it seems that you are missing my point.

However the trans movement somehow tries desperately to include these conditions and make links to transgenderism. It isn't going to happen.

I am not trying to make any "link". It's a simple question.

If a child is born intersex, which sex/gender is it? Who gets to decide?

Intersex is another DSD (already mentioned it in my last reply) and the sex of an intersex baby is determined (as always) by its chromosomes.

An example is Caster Semenya who is a genetically a male although taking part in women's competitions and that's why he is winning so many medals. Again, intersex has nothing to do with transgenderism.

Nobody decides, sec is predetermined long before you were born. Sex is not 'assigned' at birth is observed and it's a biological reality not an opinion by someone.

There are no variance of sexes. Sex is binary.

Everything you have said is wrong.

The trans movent is trying hard to include intersex conditions but they can't. They always fail.

I am not sure if you understand what intersex is.

Again, gender identities can be verified scientifically.

If you have seen from my posts it's very clear who understands what intersex is and who doesn't.

Gender identity isn't a scientific term but a made up expression which is meaningless. Gender isn't an identify you can choose.

Only the fact you brought up XXY and intersex conditions into the conversation proves the trans movement has nothing to hold on to and tries to integrate to the movement disorders of sex development, although they have nothing to do with transgenderism or the identities you have discussed.

My example of Caster Semenya it's a really good one if you want to understand intersex conditions. These are not sex variants btw. Sex is either male or female.

Again, who gets to decide the gender of an intersex child?

Here you go.


Intersex at birth? Intersex child?

Puberty. For one will decide.

Genetics were already determined

Intersex people have parts of both sexes.

Yep

Genetics. Abnormal genetics. A dominant sex will come out of puberty even as an intersex with both sets of genitalia.