It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: datguy
a reply to: Ch1nch1lla
no, instead you protest over rainbow flags and sex changes for kids.
or cry because the criminal got shot while he was trying to shoot someone else
you pretty much just admited that it wasnt boomers who sent jobs over seas but it was still their fault?
Still their fault they had bills to pay and had families to feed.
Promise me one thing, that you will never start a family, never a marry your loved one, never have kids to feed that way you can focus on changing the world, and the future generations cant blame you for thier problems...ill still be here in 20 years, it goes by fast, cant wait to see what you accomplish
originally posted by: 25shadesofgraybeard
As a older guy I will throw in my two cents. Yes, there should be term limits. Having said that I think voter apathy for multiple generations are partly to blame. I am talking about primary elections. The percantage of folks who come out for those is shamefully small. In most cases a easy win for the incumbant. If you can trust elections is another story, but putting somebody that might be better in the general via the primary process would be a good place to start.
originally posted by: Ch1nch1lla
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: Ch1nch1lla
I'm sure by the time people my age turn 35
So run for office then, if you want to "fix" things get in office and get after it.
Stop blaming people in the past for decisions they based on the data they had at the time.
That is always people's solution and it is a weak nonanswer. How do people get elected when they have no supporters, no time to campaign. Literally can't run for office because they are and will be active duty military for the foreseeable future?
A better solution is that we energize our voter base and elect younger people who reflect actual pro-America values. Not people who put every other country before America.
originally posted by: ITSALIVE
a reply to: Ch1nch1lla
No. Your generation suffers from having a participation only reward system. You don’t have to provide quality work, create a quality product or a quality idea. You grew up with a higher quality of life than the boomers. Are you ever concerned about being drafted? No? But you want to blame someone else for your quality of life. Sounds just right for your generation.
originally posted by: stevieray
Lol, your answer literally has nothing to do with what I said. And I’m fine with change, but nice of you to make up a fake life for me.
originally posted by: LordAhriman
originally posted by: stevieray
Lol, your answer literally has nothing to do with what I said. And I’m fine with change, but nice of you to make up a fake life for me.
Young people have a different view of how they want the future, boomers hate it so you call them stupid and even give them insulting nicknames. They'll leave you behind no matter what you think of them. I'm right in the middle at the tender age of 43. I tend to side with the young'ns more than the boomers.
originally posted by: stevieray
So do I. If they do more than blame the boomers.
I’m just poking fun at people who vote in people like Biden, Lightfoot and her successor, AOC, and so on.
Well deserved spoofage.
originally posted by: olaru12
Two tours of duty and I'm one of the boomer problems that ruined America? Thanks a lot and don't give me any of that "thanks for your service" BS.
originally posted by: markovian
Try and change things in favor of the people you will join the Kennedys
originally posted by: datguy
I think they are alluding to idea of assassination, or in the case of someone like myself "suicide" or "missing"
I should note now that I am of sound mind (subjective?) and in no way suicidal!