posted on Oct, 24 2023 @ 02:19 PM
a reply to:
Crazierfox
Peter Hotez tweeted about this study so I just had to take a peek. Jikkyleaks and the Mouse army would have a fit.
Newborn and Early Infant Outcomes Following Maternal Covid-19
Vaccines
They file this under Placentagate. I hope they take this study on.
142,006 infants met eligibility and at the 6 month follow-up there were only 112,623 so what happened to 30,373 missing infants? That is 21%
missing.
Some really big problems with this study that is trying to convince women that these jabs are ever so safe to take during pregnancy-
"The analysis was restricted to live births. Assessment of outcomes in live-born infants only would miss the effects of vaccination on
spontaneous
abortions and
still births." < The exact issues that Jikkeyleaks brings up with placentagate.
How many were lost and what happened to the missing 30,373 infants?
Then there is another problem, this study only included infants who were born at 37 weeks gestation, which is full term. What about the babies that
were born prematurely. How many? What % died?
They are trying to use this study to convince pregnant women who are hesitant to take the jab that it is safe and effective.
Do Not comply.
Peter Hotez receives the Anthony
Fauci Courage Leadership Award
He simply never goes away.