There's A Verdict in the E. Jean Carroll/Trump Case

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I didn't have to watch the trial. Unless there was a camera illegally placed in that dressing room, you can't prove that someone forcibly kissed you and pulled your tights down 25 or 26 years ago in a dressing room. The only thing you can do is say it happened.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gothar
Gee
With all that long term damage and horribleness, one would assume that date and time would be seared into the victim’s memory?
Guess not in this case?

Study trauma and memory and you will find your answer.

Really?
I don’t believe you
Or the lady that filed suit

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: LSU2018

"Dear Annie nag"?

Sounds like you have about as much respect for women as your Boy.

I don't respect men or women like Carroll. While you're preaching about respect for women from your soapbox, tell me how you feel about Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Greene. Come on, let's hear all about your respect for women.

Whataboutisms.

Not the subject.

Let's see how the Appeal works out. When it doesn't you can go on about how unfair it all is.

That's what I figured you'd say. You didn't disappoint.

originally posted by: LSU2018
I didn't have to watch the trial. Unless there was a camera illegally placed in that dressing room, you can't prove that someone forcibly kissed you and pulled your tights down 25 or 26 years ago in a dressing room. The only thing you can do is say it happened.

And you can call witnesses that corroborate that you brought this up when it occurred. You can call other witnesses that will corroborate that this is a pattern of behavior. And you can, this is the funny part, play the deposition of the moron in question basically saying he does this and it's okay.

Look, your boy screwed himself, not anyone else. He's a sociopath and exhibited this behavior for years, I'd be more shocked if he wasn't accused.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gothar
Gee
With all that long term damage and horribleness, one would assume that date and time would be seared into the victim’s memory?
Guess not in this case?

Study trauma and memory and you will find your answer.

Really?
I don’t believe you
Or the lady that filed suit

Really!

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: LSU2018
Ask these same people about the “extension” of the statute of limitations and it’s legality.
The entire event was bull crap.
People who actually understand justice won’t touch this case with a 50” pole.
Interesting to see who here is cheering this.

Interesting indeed, but not surprising. When they get the results they want, proof doesn't matter.

a reply to: quintessentone
Yes really!
Also your one line response is outside the standard expectations.
Perhaps in the future you could remedy that?

Can anyone tell us with certainty why this was not a criminal case? Anyone?

This was a civil case but now the media, and the TDS group, and the haters, can now all say he was 'convicted' of sexual abuse. It is absurd.

Also, the just only needed a 51% consensus here. It is not like a criminal trial.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: quintessentone
Yes really!
Also your one line response is outside the standard expectations.
Perhaps in the future you could remedy that?

So I should reply like you?

One liners on three lines.

Hmmm?

a reply to: Gothar

Plenty of women on ATS aren't buying this BS. I guess Carroll was so traumatized that she waited until the right moment to come out and "get Trump" since all the other attempts failed. Regardless, nobody is telling YOU not to believe it, we're giving our opinions and reasons why we don't.

originally posted by: matafuchs
Can anyone tell us with certainty why this was not a criminal case? Anyone?

This was a civil case but now the media, and the TDS group, and the haters, can now all say he was 'convicted' of sexual abuse. It is absurd.

Also, the just only needed a 51% consensus here. It is not like a criminal trial.

I was wondering that too. Sexual abuse, in any form, is criminal IMO.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: LSU2018
Ask these same people about the “extension” of the statute of limitations and it’s legality.
The entire event was bull crap.
People who actually understand justice won’t touch this case with a 50” pole.
Interesting to see who here is cheering this.

Interesting indeed, but not surprising. When they get the results they want, proof doesn't matter.

Were they the target of a moving legal standard, I submit the wailing would be worse than when mr trump won the presidency.
The fact that they stand behind this as justice exposes their agenda driven political persecution.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: quintessentone
Yes really!
Also your one line response is outside the standard expectations.
Perhaps in the future you could remedy that?

So I should reply like you?

One liners on three lines.

Hmmm?

Nah
Just follow the rules.
Why is that hard for you people?

You know, statue of limitations and all……….

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: LSU2018
You don't have to question her rationale, most of us already know why she waited.

I know, she did it to screw your boy over.

That's correct, and you don't need any proof because you're ok with the timely results.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: quintessentone
Yes really!
Also your one line response is outside the standard expectations.
Perhaps in the future you could remedy that?

So I should reply like you?

One liners on three lines.

Hmmm?

Nah
Just follow the rules.
Why is that hard for you people?

You know, statue of limitations and all……….

Sure Shooter keep telling yourself that.

Over and over.

And over again.

a reply to: quintessentone
You are good with a sliding scale on statues of limitations?
Guess that’s not surprising.

Maybe the left shouldn't have destroyed their credibility by constantly lying about the man.

Gee I wonder why no one believes your claims about him anymore.

I said it years ago, if he ever does something legitimately wrong no one is gonna believe it except the unhinged leftists that would believe you if you claimed Trump assassinated Kennedy.

So yeah, cry me a river that no one believes this. It's your own fault.

LIe some more, idiots. Lie some more.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gothar
Gee
With all that long term damage and horribleness, one would assume that date and time would be seared into the victim’s memory?
Guess not in this case?

She also remembers that it lasted 3 minutes. How can someone so traumatized remember exactly how long it took to be forcibly kissed, have their tights pulled down, and raped all while struggling in a little dressing room that's barely big enough for one person.

FTR, like most of us mean ol hateful men, I would never condone actual rape and would rather see rapists dangle.

originally posted by: LSU2018
That's correct, and you don't need any proof because you're ok with the timely results.

That's it! There's the victim mentality you need.

Major Aggrievement is the bread and butter right now, it permits you to ignore everything someone does because in some twisted version of reality they are all out to get you. Forget someone said they actually do these things, it's not true since everyone is out to get him.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Have you ever fabricated a story while you were telling it?