Audrey Hale manifesto is "too dangerous" for the rest of us to see.

a reply to: M5xaz

A lot of pushing the narrative that the manifesto would be released very soon, but in the end place the final decision on the FBI as the people who will allow the release to take place. What's weird to me is that even if both the Nashville Police and FBI read the manifesto, nothing about a motive has been released or any other information from it.

Seems weird that even with a manifesto in hand, nobody seems to know what the motivation for the shooting is? That's why I'm beginning to question if one even exists.

a reply to: Guyfriday

Oh, it exists, but they don't want us to know it.

It's part of the incredibly dangerous bit because it's probably exactly what we all think, but so long as it's not official, then it remains conjecture and nothing more.

In a text “they” sent to a former classmate (possibly a crush ?) prior to her killing spree, Audrey writes “ My family doesn’t know what I’m about to do. One day this will make more sense, I’ve left more than enough evidence behind, but something bad is about to happen “

So, it sure seems like she left some sort of explanation behind she wanted to be known/read. My guess is she had some sort of grievance that would be embarrassing to someone or she blames her gender confusion for her suicidal/murderous thoughts/actions, giving further proof that there is a mental illness element to the transgender movement.

nypost.com...

a reply to: MountainLaurel

From the information provided by your link, I would start asking questions about Audrey Hale's family. If, as the texts indicate, there was a trail left behind, then how come nobody is piecing that together. It would seem that this focus on the manifesto is chewing away at time that could be spent solving that mystery.

we won't get it unless someone leaks it to a site like kiwifarms, but all too happy to drop the Louisville shooter's manifesto

a reply to: ketsuko

Man, I remember when the YMCA was just a catchy disco song/dance

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: M5xaz

A lot of pushing the narrative that the manifesto would be released very soon, but in the end place the final decision on the FBI as the people who will allow the release to take place. What's weird to me is that even if both the Nashville Police and FBI read the manifesto, nothing about a motive has been released or any other information from it.

Seems weird that even with a manifesto in hand, nobody seems to know what the motivation for the shooting is? That's why I'm beginning to question if one even exists.

There can never be any justification for murdering three children, manifesto or not.

Just proves beyond a doubt what we have always known: Trannys are mental patients

a reply to: Maxmars

But who's names... Who is threatened?
what would it proof?

There is a fishy part in all of it with the 2013 accusations of pedophiles being harbored in that school she herself went to, and later decided to shoot up.

Being a victim of pedophilia is a very plausible reason to loose the plot. I bet she was in psychological treatment too...

Unlike the trans network which is new and hardly moving anything behind the scenes, the pedo network is not to be underestimated.
having a manifesto that would name names, has the potential to be astronomically dangerous to the individuals that are in positions to make the manifesto inaccessible...

Could be something big, could be Nothing.

a reply to: Terpene

Lemmee guess, it'll only be big if it reveals the kids touched poor Audrey in the bad place.

You can bet your sweet fanny that if it was some sort of "far-right" manifesto it would be all over the news. How stupid do they think we are? Don't answer that.

Kind of like how the narrative on a headline about Bud Light sales that I saw this morning painted the people who stop buying their beer as "far-right." It's complete BS and those on the left can't see the insane bias going on in our media I think you are doing everyone a disservice. Everyone needs to quit buying into this political mush.

a reply to: ketsuko

You are right, the kids don't add up... But applying reason won't get us any closer as to what was going on in that crazy mind. Releasing the data pertinent to the case certainly would.

At least we know the last thing that went trough her head....
I'm not for jumping to conclusions if not all facts are on the table, although I might do it from time to time...

That's not what I was trying to say with big or not big.
I meant it could be a big contributing factor or not, as to why they deem it so dangerous...

It would be just as big if it revealed an actual network of trans that is not part of an already existing intelligence network, but I seriously doubt it...

I can't fathom how those loons could create a network that extensive in such a short time... Or they aren't loons.... Or it's not their network...

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Maxmars

But who's names... Who is threatened?
what would it proof?

There is a fishy part in all of it with the 2013 accusations of pedophiles being harbored in that school she herself went to, and later decided to shoot up.

Being a victim of pedophilia is a very plausible reason to loose the plot. I bet she was in psychological treatment too...

Unlike the trans network which is new and hardly moving anything behind the scenes, the pedo network is not to be underestimated.
having a manifesto that would name names, has the potential to be astronomically dangerous to the individuals that are in positions to make the manifesto inaccessible...

Could be something big, could be Nothing.

Pretty certain that we've already been thru this.

One case was brought with outrageous claims that was seeking monetary recompense and they lost.

casetext.com...

Then the same claimant tried to appeal, lost that and had to pay the defendants costs for wasting their time and money.

casetext.com...

Probably ought to get off the "harboring pedophiles" bandwagon good sir/ma'am.

a reply to: Moon68

Just accusations... right!!!
I've heard that before, too many times in combination with that particular topic to be coincidence.

I hope, if you get to have kids, you'll never have to go trough proving a crime was committed to them.
You might find yourself confronted with a network of rabbit holes that "allegedly" make and break presidents all over the globe...

Just accusations!
sure, im not surprised either...
If you've been following conspiracy for some time, you noticed that this is common with all things higher up pedos... Just accusations...

It's one of the themes, where most here no matter their political and religious affiliations actually agree it being a real epidemic threat.

Someone on this board actually suggesting because of that, there is noting to see here move along, is interesting if not worrisome...

a reply to: KMeRMoRe

It's more about pushing people to extremes. You're buying into it too.
To them it doesn't matter how you do, you'll move a step further from the center.

The "everyone who isn't with me, is against me" approach, isn't wise in a country based on political oppositions.

The way it seems to me, they now only need the conservatives, which are usually slower to abandon their position, to move to the extremes for their plan to actually work.

Hence all the slurs.
If everyone thinks and says I'm far-right because I have a diffrent opinion , i might as well behave as one... And on we move a little closerto the extreme.

I really hope they fail, but it's not looking good if you take ats as indicator on how conservatives feel and where they'd like things to go.

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Moon68

Just accusations... right!!!
I've heard that before, too many times in combination with that particular topic to be coincidence.

I hope, if you get to have kids, you'll never have to go trough proving a crime was committed to them.
You might find yourself confronted with a network of rabbit holes that "allegedly" make and break presidents all over the globe...

Just accusations!
sure, im not surprised either...
If you've been following conspiracy for some time, you noticed that this is common with all things higher up pedos... Just accusations...

It's one of the themes, where most here no matter their political and religious affiliations actually agree it being a real epidemic threat.

Someone on this board actually suggesting because of that, there is noting to see here move along, is interesting if not worrisome...

1: An emotional outburst instead of addressing the information is something usually reserved for the MudPit.

2: My kids are all grown and my grandkids are well on their way to being also. I have had to deal with abuse/molestation with one of them. It was made easier when the perpetrator admitted to it but tried to shift responsibility by accusing someone else of doing it to them that turned out to be a lie. I would be very careful how you tread on this subject with me.

3: As a lurker here for more than 15 years before finally making an account, I'd say I've been following conspiracy for a while now.

Appealing to emotion without addressing the facts in this case is a disservice. The facts are:

The church discovered that there was a convicted pedophile working for the church. When confronted, the person admitted to it and was let go.

A couple that attended the church found out and confronted church officials. What happened then is up for debate. He said/they said argument.

The couple filed a lawsuit against the church, lobbing many allegations, seeking monetary recompense.

The couple lost in court, then filed an appeal.

The couple lost on appeal and was ordered to pay the legal expenses of the defendant.

Those are the facts of this case. You can agree or disagree with the outcome but nothing in the facts lends credence to the assertation that "the school harbors pedophiles".

a reply to: Moon68

The emotional part you deduced how exactly?
For the exclamation mark?
For the repetitions?
Or maybe.... they weren't even my emotions?

I was underlying your argument to shrug it off, it is a valid argument to do so... It's just... most don't...

Maybe I misjudged you, were you such an amid defendant of the legal system when pizza gate broke?

What about the president of the USA?

originally posted by: Terpene
a reply to: Moon68

The emotional part you deduced how exactly?
For the exclamation mark?
For the repetitions?
Or maybe.... they weren't even my emotions?

I was underlying your argument to shrug it off, it is a valid argument to do so... It's just... most don't...

Maybe I misjudged you, were you such an amid defendant of the legal system when pizza gate broke?

What about the president of the USA?

Deduced by the pleading tone of your post.
Doesn't more exclamation marks mean as increase in the emotional excitation?
If you repeat yourself enough times it becomes true. Right?
If not your emotions, then to whom do they belong?

The only thing I shrugged off was your repeated assertation that the school harbors pedophiles which isn't backed up by any evidence whatsoever.

I don't recall having much of an opinion on "pizza-gate" since it seemed quite "out there" even for a conspiracy enthusiast.

What about President Sniffalot?

a reply to: Moon68

I think there is a chance the info is pertinent to the whole thing.
Why do you think it absolutely isn't?


After learning that the case went nowhere in the last thread, I took extra care to put the word accusations in it, this time.
Is accusations not correctly worded from a legal point of view? I'm not good with the legal vocabulary...

Perhaps.

It could also be expressing extreme regret that it bought into the whole trans crap and that it’s life is a misery that it will express through extreme violence against vulnerable people.

Maybe.

a reply to: Allaroundyou

pic]fu6446dd26.jpg[/pic

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: greendust

If I had to guess the manifesto probably talks about children in not a good way.
That is the only reason I can think of as to why.
I'm sure there could be other reasons. I'm just trying to think of a logical reason for this.

Or maybe the FBI just thinks we are that dangerous as a people.....

pic]fu6446dd26.jpg[/pic]

pic]he6446dd25.jpg[/pic