Audrey Hale manifesto is "too dangerous" for the rest of us to see.

a reply to: greendust

I assume that means the manifesto talks about her/his/its handlers and implicates them.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: greendust

If I had to guess the manifesto probably talks about children in not a good way.

But yet the abortion cult still gets to kill babies.
If what you say is true, I see no difference.

I see what you are saying....
But really think about what I said....
I'm not going to say what I implied.

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: greendust

If I had to guess the manifesto probably talks about children in not a good way.

But yet the abortion cult still gets to kill babies.
If what you say is true, I see no difference.

I see what you are saying....
But really think about what I said....
I'm not going to say what I implied.

Is there any evidence that the nutjob killer was a pedophile?
I am sure it would have already been leaked if that was true.

The FBI aren't releasing the manifesto because thats the best way to ratchet up the pressure in the culture war they are backing. Keep the people guessing and soon they will be at each others throughts.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Allaroundyou

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: greendust

If I had to guess the manifesto probably talks about children in not a good way.

But yet the abortion cult still gets to kill babies.
If what you say is true, I see no difference.

I see what you are saying....
But really think about what I said....
I'm not going to say what I implied.

Is there any evidence that the nutjob killer was a pedophile?
I am sure it would have already been leaked if that was true.

Not that I've seen.
But I would imagine if the nutjob was and wrote about it, that would make sense why the FBI wouldn't release it.
Just imagine the physical violence that would follow if it did contain that kind of speak.

For those of you who feel a nasty déjà vu in this...

Yes.

There is ONLY ONE REASON to deny it's release that makes a convincing proposition...

She named names... specified conversations, quoted people... dates, times... verifiable things.

Not making a moral stand here.

(opinionated supposition follows)

"Too dangerous" is the kind of construct that propagandists use to evoke outrage and passion... to incite talking head chatter (a script they'll gladly supply.) The FBI's statements might as well have come straight from a think tank. Such propaganda might not even be directed at readers as the target... but at a global audience as an 'image of America.'

a reply to: Maxmars

Let's just say that Epstein didn't kill himself, and why hasn't Congress released the list of names on their own "hush money" fund?

I keep thinking in terms of that sort of "too dangerous".

Well, it's interesting to ME how suddenly, Veritas releases this footage specifically about how docs (at least in NY) are taking kids as young as TEN and putting them on puberty blockers and at 14, on opposite-sex hormones. They even name the center where it's happening the most at, and there's this one (Pabis) that's like, "Yeah, I've never done a 10 year old...(exact words - let's HOPE that he's actually talking about transgender surgery, right? gross.) ...but I would, yeah."

But seriously, tho - I wonder how long Veritas has been sitting on this, seeing as how it no longer has O'Keefe in it (Which happened a few months ago, if I remember correctly) but at the same time, THIS *points upward* is ALSO going on at the exact same time, which leads me to believe they actually waited until something like what the OP described happened, then JUMPED on it - which also makes me wonder if there isn't a little, itsy bitsy part of the "right-wing" (*note: I am not politically decided on either, and never will be - I've seen enough to know what a nasty bird of prey looks like, and don't ignore EITHER of it's wings or set of Talons However, I DO agree that this # is sick, and that I think Drag Queen Story Hour is ridiculous, and so is letting "trans kids" hang out with questionable people, simply bc they're trans, and be talking about inappropriate things with them that adults usually WOULDN'T be talking to them about ) that feels a little good to see themselves vindicated by stuff like this, and that in some (not all by any means, but definitely some, as we used to be on the same radio station as ppl like them), it causes disturbing behavior (not in any way violent usually, it's just toxic and hateful and such).

I noticed this issue ramping up a lot a few weeks ago, with a story about another girl who was suing her doctors for cutting off her breasts at 13yo, the underage girl that testified about the YMCA, other "omg i can't believe this!" vids about (obvious) men in drag in the women's bathroom, fondling themselves in front of women/girls, then posting it on porn-type social media sites.... I mean, obviously, it's either a pervert being a pervert, or it's a man who really HATES Trans people that's trying to make them look SO enormously bad, that the ppl will call for them to be treated differently due to their decisions....Just my $.02, I don't have a horse in this race, male or female, or any of the other "50 genders", lol.

a reply to: Darko

YMCA is a wee bit scary.

We're sending our son to camp this summer, and we got the parents' handbook. They carry the same policy that a lot of school districts in Cali do - if the kid comes out or transes there, they will facilitate and *not* tell the parents. It's in the handbook.

I'm not 100% comfortable with this honestly, but he's going to run into it sooner or later. I can't shield him forever. The odds that he gets stuck in it are not great but they are growing all the time at the rate this mess is accelerating.

a reply to: Darko

Oh this is going to get much uglier.


Some states are trying to make it so that they can take your kids and just tell you that they ran away because of "Coming Out".

I said this years ago about how the SARS Corona Virus T-2 was going to be used to take people's children, but luckily that never panned out so now here we are and this whole Trans-Issue seems to be their next attempt to take away people's children.

I think a case could be made that by not releasing this manifesto it discriminates against the Trans-Community.

Ted Kaczynski's Manifesto was released, and no real harm happened.

Timothy McVeigh's manifesto was released, and no real harm happened.

Christopher Dorner's manifesto was released, and no real harm happened.

So how can this "Trans-identified" person cause any harm?

Smells like discrimination to me.

a reply to: greendust

The Manifesto almost certainly vaporizes the "victim tranny narrative" and confirms every known stereotype about trannys, their mental case status, their extreme anger against everyone, their desire for "revenge" against children for not "affirming" their new tranny gender, their homicidal hate of Christians, etc

a reply to: M5xaz

or it could callout a lot of school officials for child abuse and sexual assaults. We don't know what's in the manifesto, but I have another question about this.

How do we know a manifesto really exists? Was it posted anywhere, and if it was why isn't it anywhere to be found now?

Could this "manifesto" be nothing but vaper wear to keep people from spending time looking into actual facts about the case?

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: M5xaz

or it could callout a lot of school officials for child abuse and sexual assaults. We don't know what's in the manifesto, but I have another question about this.

How do we know a manifesto really exists? Was it posted anywhere, and if it was why isn't it anywhere to be found now?

Could this "manifesto" be nothing but vaper wear to keep people from spending time looking into actual facts about the case?

The existence of the manifesto was revealed by police within hours of the shooting

a reply to: M5xaz

but no real evidence of it existing?

a reply to: Guyfriday

Minnesota has passed or is passing legislation to make themselves a sort of sanctuary state for minor transitions. The only requirements they are seeking is that an adult bring the child in from outside the state. The parents need not know. That opens up all kinds of cans of worms.

Obviously they imagine themselves some sort of terminal on an underground railroad funneling oppressed transkids to their liberation and freedom since states all around the Minnesota borders have passed laws making minor medical transitions restricted.

a reply to: ketsuko

The more the states pass these types of laws, and permit these types of behaviors, the more I think we've all found the replacement for Epstein's little business he had going on.

originally posted by: Guyfriday
a reply to: M5xaz

but no real evidence of it existing?

Well, agreed that I would not trust the FBI alone, but apparently both the Nashville Police and the FBI have viewed the document.

www.independent.co.uk...