Bombshell publication: The mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective but outright dangerous

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Yep, this is the final nails in the coffin of the mRNA injections. They are all risk, and not safe. It's basically like injecting poison, except it's a more sophisticated poison that could kill you much later on.

Of the vaccines available the mrna seem to be an issue for some young people.
ps: my old username could have been Tavistock ?
What do you think lol

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: Asmodeus3

It will take me a while read the entire report, but having been in the field for a number of years, the idea of any vaccine being created at warp speed, especially for what was being labeled a novel disease of which they supposedly had little knowledge, had me running for the exit.

The fact they were pushing it with so little info of disease or vaccine, was highly suspicious to me so I opted out.

I didn't get as much blow back as many, because luck and the Holy Spirit was with me.

I live in Florida, and I had amazing coworkers. Most of them took the vaccine, but they supported my decision not to take it, and not just stood beside me, they fought for me.

So I am not at all surprised there are issues with the vaccine.

All the tech , medical advancements & military tech you see today were being hashed out 30 years prior to us the public seeing it as a very reliable rule .
Why would big pharma release a product that was going to kill 100s of millions of people according to the percentage increase of deaths reported here by bitchute experts or other fringe media sources ?
Big pharma wants to be in your pocket for as many years as possible & knowingly releasing a vaccine that was so dangerous ( according to most here on ATS )
would violate the interests of their investment board.
No country would vaccinate it’s standing military with something that would potentially kill even 2% of it’s members. Currently our US armed forces receive up to 19 shots during boot camp depending on service & deployment.
Do you believe the pentagon would allow SAC nuclear bomber crews , nuclear submarine crews & NORAD personnel be injected with any substance that is as dangerous as reported here on ATS .
YouTube , Bitchute , The View , Hannity etc are not news sources nor is Bret Weinstein or Clayton Morris .
They are all identity & sponsor driven .
Basic logic is all that is needed 90% of the time .
Most people including here on ATS glean all their info from other experts so to say .
For every official expert or paper written about climate , covid , vaccines & war has equal amounts of experts & papers showing the opposite of the prior experts .
Ill ask you a simple question: What government would jeopardize it’s military , medical , power grid , tech , resources & education sectors by administering nefarious vaccines thus killing 20-50% of it’s manpower as reported by all these ridiculous vaccine experts here on ATS ?

Regardless of your rhetorical questions the reality is that the Pharmaceuticals have released a product that haven't gone through the standard checkpoints of safety and as a result these junk products have caused plenty of harm and deaths. Still the medium and king term effects are unknown but what is known is the role of the free spike protein that can travel to all major organs and cause inflammation and deliberating conditions.

You can thank Trump for project warp speed on these vaccines & outside of other’s opinions on vaccines , what credentials do you have to make such medical claims .
There are over a million physicians in America & almost all of them had their families & loved ones vaccinated. How can you explain a huge subset of well above average IQ doctors doing that if there is overwhelming evidence of how destructive the vaccines are ? Im not agreeing or disagreeing with you , but I am saying 100% logic & reasoning are on my side in this salvo back & forth .
Your mind is fascinating to me .

We have gone through this several times with other members. You don't need credentials to observe that this entire campaign is anti-scientific, absurd and ludicrous. What credentials do the vaccine apologists have and the defenders of the official narratives when they were propagating that these products were safe and effective?!

The numbers you are claiming are irrelevant to the conversation. Many physicians did follow the official narratives either because they believed the products were safe and effective or because they were coerced, pressured, intimidated, or even threatened with dismissal if they didn't get 'vaccinated'.

As a result of this absurd campaign, Florida has issued a major health warning trying to ban the mRNA products, Idaho is trying to criminalize their administration, the UK is no longer making it available to anyone under the age of 50. Denmark has done the same thing and other countries and US States are thinking to follow the same route.

No the 100% logic and reasoning is not on your side. This is delusional thinking.

It's better if you make some reading in regards to the harms caused by these products and the deaths associated with them.

Countless millions of doctors & nurse’s worldwide support the vaccine science as safe , compared to a few hundred doctors who disagree. How on earth could you keep a lid on something that would harm a doctor’s own family.
Your logic is interesting to me . Atorvastatin Is the number one prescribed drug in America ( cholesterol drug ) that keeps people from having heart attacks & strokes , so why would big pharma roll out a once or twice a year vaccine for covid that is going to kill potential clients of a long term daily expensive drug like Atorvastatin ?
Logic is a funny animal, it sits right next to you daily looking for attention , but is ignored in exchange for the tv or computer .

Your numbers and mathematics are not correct but coming out of your mind. Any link or source to support your assertions? The rest again is a big strawman that you have created in the absence of any food and valid arguments. Stop the vaccine apologetics and the defending of the pharmaceuticals. If you want an answer to your rhetorical questions there are good philosophy departments all over the country that you can ask them the same questions.

Once again, name a medical doctor in America that is NOT beholden to big pharama ?
Do you live in a indigenous tribe in Borneo ?
Big pharma is in lock step with all hospitals & doctors. The burden of proof is in your court & not mine . I don’t believe big pharma is out to harm us , because an alive cow gives milk for years rather than steak for 6 months .
3-0 me .

The burden of proof is on you as you made the claim that 99% of the doctors in the US are controlled by big pharma. Any evidence for this? Or is just your personal opinion?

It is futile to try to defend the pharmaceuticals or apologise on their behalf.

You have come to the conclusion that I believe millions of doctors knowingly poisoned their kids ,family, friends & community members over money!!! Has someone told you that I believe in what you have just said??

We call this a big strawman...

You also conclude that my logic fails based on your strawman. You seriously need better arguments and but just making up and attacking the strawman continuously.

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Yep, this is the final nails in the coffin of the mRNA injections. They are all risk, and not safe. It's basically like injecting poison, except it's a more sophisticated poison that could kill you much later on.

Of the vaccines available the mrna seem to be an issue for some young people.
ps: my old username could have been Tavistock ?
What do you think lol

Not that's not correct. All vaccines that used have caused harms and deaths. The Astrazeneca and J&J for example have been withdrawn from most countries that have used them. The Astrazeneca for example was also withdrawn from the UK which is the country of origin of the vaccine.

In terms of the mRNA 'vaccines'. According to what is written by several scientists online and according to the harms recorded, this must be the most failed medical product in history. To the point that Florida has issued a major health warning and is trying to ban the product, Idaho us trying to criminalise their administration, the UK is no longer making it available to anyone under the age of 50 and Denmark has done the same. Other countries are thinking of similar measures. Far from being a success...

One of my threads that I made sometime ago.

ground.news...

Autopsy Reveals Healthy 36-Year-Old Mother Died from First Dose of Covid Pfizer Vaccine
Summary by Ground News

Dawn Wooldridge received her first dose of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine last June 4. After eleven days following her vaccination, she died unexpectedly. An inquest heard that the unexpected death was likely caused as a result of the vaccination. Dr Sukhvinder Ghataura told the coroner: 'It is more than likely Dawn died in response to the Covid jab' Her husband Ashley was visibly shocked in the coroner's room.

a reply to: SecrettoSociety

In terms of your other assertions in relation to the pharmaceuticals you need to think before claiming that they are not there to harm you or not there to make profit for themselves. They have been convicted several times for deception, fraud, and for harming people with their products and have paid billions of dollars in criminal fines.



ehlinelaw.com...

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

The link above discusses the story of 12 year old Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer for the Pfizer vaccine clinical trials. Her parents signed her up as they probably wanted to see an end to the pandemic and do the their part given that they are both graduates as far as I remember. I don't understand why they didn't sign up themselves by the way.

But now, Maddie is in a wheelchair and needs a feeding tube. She is now disabled, probably for the rest of her life and has debilitating conditions. Given she was a healthy kid before receiving the "life-saving vaccines" ....

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: SecrettoSociety

In terms of your other assertions in relation to the pharmaceuticals you need to think before claiming that they are not there to harm you or not there to make profit for themselves. They have been convicted several times for deception, fraud, and for harming people with their products and have paid billions of dollars in criminal fines.



ehlinelaw.com...

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

The link above discusses the story of 12 year old Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer for the Pfizer vaccine clinical trials. Her parents signed her up as they probably wanted to see an end to the pandemic and do the their part given that they are both graduates as far as I remember. I don't understand why they didn't sign up themselves by the way.

But now, Maddie is in a wheelchair and needs a feeding tube. She is now disabled, probably for the rest of her life and has debilitating conditions. Given she was a healthy kid before receiving the "life-saving vaccines" ....

You do understand that all Covid infections & strains cause heart & lung issues for many people. Right ?

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Pharmacuetical companies have a long history for knowingly supplying medications to the populace that they knew to be harmful, potentially deadly, and or extremely addictive.

It is a given fact that Pharmacuetical companies are money making industries, and they have very little regard for the populace when money is on the line.

Unfortunately, doctors of medicine, are the worker bees to the industry. Many are blind to their role in the global game. Others know exactly what is going on and the role they play, and use it to their advantage.

When it comes to medicine, you have to take the good with the bad, because that is all we have at the moment.

There are a few areas where you can still get natural treatment providers, and where medicine men and women, and herbalist, can legally practice, but there are not many. And they are the black sheep of the health care industry.

originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Pharmacuetical companies have a long history for knowingly supplying medications to the populace that they knew to be harmful, potentially deadly, and or extremely addictive.

It is a given fact that Pharmacuetical companies are money making industries, and they have very little regard for the populace when money is on the line.

Unfortunately, doctors of medicine, are the worker bees to the industry. Many are blind to their role in the global game. Others know exactly what is going on and the role they play, and use it to their advantage.

When it comes to medicine, you have to take the good with the bad, because that is all we have at the moment.

There are a few areas where you can still get natural treatment providers, and where medicine men and women, and herbalist, can legally practice, but there are not many. And they are the black sheep of the health care industry.

I am very careful on what medicines I use and I only use them when it is absolutely necessary. Untested, experimental, and potentially hazardous products are rejected outright. In principle I see no reason why children and a large number of young and middle age healthy adults will use a vaccine or a drug hasn't gone through the major safety checkpoints and when at the same time these age groups have very low risk from SARS-CoV-2.

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: SecrettoSociety

In terms of your other assertions in relation to the pharmaceuticals you need to think before claiming that they are not there to harm you or not there to make profit for themselves. They have been convicted several times for deception, fraud, and for harming people with their products and have paid billions of dollars in criminal fines.



ehlinelaw.com...

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

The link above discusses the story of 12 year old Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer for the Pfizer vaccine clinical trials. Her parents signed her up as they probably wanted to see an end to the pandemic and do the their part given that they are both graduates as far as I remember. I don't understand why they didn't sign up themselves by the way.

But now, Maddie is in a wheelchair and needs a feeding tube. She is now disabled, probably for the rest of her life and has debilitating conditions. Given she was a healthy kid before receiving the "life-saving vaccines" ....

You do understand that all Covid infections & strains cause heart & lung issues for many people. Right ?

I didn't see this reply but you seem to try to change the conversation to something else given that you cannot argue against what I have posted i.e harms and deaths from there products.

From another thread but relevant to the deaths due to Covid

So... Danish SSI (equiv. to the CDC) decided to go through the numbers and as it turns out the "official" death toll of 8300, has been adjusted down to under half... 3842.

Huge reduction in the number of deaths due to Covid... 53.7% percentage decrease in this case.

We know that the number deaths due to Covid have been inflated worldwide. We need to see by how much.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: SecrettoSociety

In terms of your other assertions in relation to the pharmaceuticals you need to think before claiming that they are not there to harm you or not there to make profit for themselves. They have been convicted several times for deception, fraud, and for harming people with their products and have paid billions of dollars in criminal fines.



ehlinelaw.com...

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

The link above discusses the story of 12 year old Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer for the Pfizer vaccine clinical trials. Her parents signed her up as they probably wanted to see an end to the pandemic and do the their part given that they are both graduates as far as I remember. I don't understand why they didn't sign up themselves by the way.

But now, Maddie is in a wheelchair and needs a feeding tube. She is now disabled, probably for the rest of her life and has debilitating conditions. Given she was a healthy kid before receiving the "life-saving vaccines" ....

You do understand that all Covid infections & strains cause heart & lung issues for many people. Right ?

I didn't see this reply but you seem to try to change the conversation to something else given that you cannot argue against what I have posted i.e harms and deaths from there products.

From another thread but relevant to the deaths due to Covid

So... Danish SSI (equiv. to the CDC) decided to go through the numbers and as it turns out the "official" death toll of 8300, has been adjusted down to under half... 3842.

Huge reduction in the number of deaths due to Covid... 53.7% percentage decrease in this case.

We know that the number deaths due to Covid have been inflated worldwide. We need to see by how much.

A donut without a hole is a Danish.
Be bop bada bot Be bop bada bop it’s the Factsman

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Your source is a firm of Ambulance chasing lawyers?

Yeah we have them too.

It's 99% of lawyers that give the rest of us a bad name.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Your source is a firm of Ambulance chasing lawyers?

Yeah we have them too.

It's 99% of lawyers that give the rest of us a bad name.

Clearly Pfizer has classified adverse events as non related to the vaccines. Deception and fraud as the very least. The part about the firm has no merits so try better when you want to defend the pharmaceuticals next time..

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

Stop the vaccine apologetics and the defending of the Pharmaceuticals

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: SecrettoSociety

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: SecrettoSociety

In terms of your other assertions in relation to the pharmaceuticals you need to think before claiming that they are not there to harm you or not there to make profit for themselves. They have been convicted several times for deception, fraud, and for harming people with their products and have paid billions of dollars in criminal fines.



ehlinelaw.com...

The US District Court of Texas ordered FDA to release documents of clinical trials of the Covid-19 shots after getting sued by attorneys at Siri & Glimstad. The documents revealed Pfizer classifying adverse events as non-related to the vaccine.

The link above discusses the story of 12 year old Maddie de Garay who was a volunteer for the Pfizer vaccine clinical trials. Her parents signed her up as they probably wanted to see an end to the pandemic and do the their part given that they are both graduates as far as I remember. I don't understand why they didn't sign up themselves by the way.

But now, Maddie is in a wheelchair and needs a feeding tube. She is now disabled, probably for the rest of her life and has debilitating conditions. Given she was a healthy kid before receiving the "life-saving vaccines" ....

You do understand that all Covid infections & strains cause heart & lung issues for many people. Right ?

I didn't see this reply but you seem to try to change the conversation to something else given that you cannot argue against what I have posted i.e harms and deaths from there products.

From another thread but relevant to the deaths due to Covid

So... Danish SSI (equiv. to the CDC) decided to go through the numbers and as it turns out the "official" death toll of 8300, has been adjusted down to under half... 3842.

Huge reduction in the number of deaths due to Covid... 53.7% percentage decrease in this case.

We know that the number deaths due to Covid have been inflated worldwide. We need to see by how much.

A donut without a hole is a Danish.
Be bop bada bot Be bop bada bop it’s the Factsman

Again you have nothing to argue against the facts. At least you admit it.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Once a bleedin' gain.

"Stop the vaccine apologetics and the defending of the Pharmaceuticals"

Where do you get that from my post?

Or any of them?

I am merely questioning your Ambulance chasing lawyer source.

That's neither apologising for vaccines or defending pharmaceuticals.

It's me trying to engage you in an adult and logical debate.

So stop with the automated, repetitive knee jerk reaction.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Once a bleedin' gain.

"Stop the vaccine apologetics and the defending of the Pharmaceuticals"

Where do you get that from my post?

Or any of them?

I am merely questioning your Ambulance chasing lawyer source.

That's neither apologising for vaccines or defending pharmaceuticals.

It's me trying to engage you in an adult and logical debate.

So stop with the automated, repetitive knee jerk reaction.

Perhaps you need to take a look at the publication then that I posted in the opening page.

As a result of this absurd campaign, Florida has issued a major health warning trying to ban the mRNA products, Idaho is trying to criminalize their administration, the UK is no longer making it available to anyone under the age of 50. Denmark has done the same thing and other countries and US States are thinking to follow the same route.

The new development is the 'vaccines' will not be offered to those under the age of 75 as it seems in the UK

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

From the opening page

A worldwide Bayesian causal Impact analysis suggests that COVID-19 gene therapy (mRNA vaccine) causes more COVID-19 cases per million and more non-Covid deaths per million than are associated with COVID-19 [43].

An abundance of studies has shown that the mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous.

I understand that you got vaccinated and you don't want to admit you made a mistake or you don't think you have made a mistake by trusting the 'science'

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Fine.

Bored arguing with the ATS equivalent of the Borg.

Wake me up when the administration of mRNA vaccines is actually criminalised. If it ever will be.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

You understand nothing about me.

Why make this about me?

If you want to get it on, PM me.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Fine.

Bored arguing with the ATS equivalent of the Borg.

Wake me up when the administration of mRNA vaccines is actually criminalised. If it ever will be.

Is not necessary to criminalise the administration of these products. Although Idaho is trying to do it. Proper information and investigations will reveal the danger that comes with their use. It's already done to a certain degree.

The mRNA products for SARS-CoV-2 are not safe and effective.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Ahem. You were cheerleading for it's criminalising?

Now it ain't happening, you are rowing back.

Plain as day.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Ahem. You were cheerleading for it's criminalising?

Now it ain't happening, you are rowing back.

Plain as day.

No you misunderstood me. I said it is not necessary to criminalise their administration. As long as the public understands that these products are not safe and effective then that's more than enough. Some States or Countries may eventually do prohibit their use. I have no issue with this.