It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen
So I'm right. You have no point. And, you have nothing to offer to the thread or its subject.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: xuenchen
The real point is you refuse to comment on a simple question
In other words, you have no independent point.
And you're trying to make something of the fact that you don't like my answer to your off topic question.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
and what happens when counterfeit anti-science and counterfeit science gets taught in schools hundreds of years later?
😀bittery jittery
....and what happens when counterfeit anti-science and counterfeit science gets taught in schools hundreds of years later?
...
WHEREAS, a scientific fact is observable and repeatable, and if it does not meet these criteria, it is a
theory that is defined as speculation and is for higher education to explore, debate, and test to ultimately reach
a scientific conclusion of fact or fiction.
...
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION. Section 1. Requirements for science instruction in schools. (1) Science instruction may not include subject matter that is not scientific fact.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
What's your point? What do you think happens after hundreds of years of counterfit science, like Adam & Eve and a 7-day creation story, Noah's Ark and the Great Flood story, the Virgin Birth and the resurrection of Jesus after being dead for 3 days?
Marine archaeologists have found the first evidence of a people who perished in a great flood of the Black Sea that has been linked with the story of Noah's ark.
Using robot underwater vehicles more than 300ft below the sea's surface, they have begun to map a rolling landscape, fed by meandering streams and marked with wattle and daub houses, that was flooded more than 7,000 years ago.
...
...
WHEREAS, a scientific fact is observable and repeatable, and if it does not meet these criteria, it is a
theory that is defined as speculation and is for higher education to explore, debate, and test to ultimately reach
a scientific conclusion of fact or fiction.
...
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: frogs453
And again you completely leave out the context of that section of the bill...
...
WHEREAS, a scientific fact is observable and repeatable, and if it does not meet these criteria, it is a
theory that is defined as speculation and is for higher education to explore, debate, and test to ultimately reach
a scientific conclusion of fact or fiction.
...
SENATE BILL NO. 235
You need to learn to consider the context of a sentence...
If it is not a scientific fact then it is defined as SPECULATION. You know, like your "human induced climate change hoax" which is speculation derived from lies...
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION. Section 1. Requirements for science instruction in schools. (1) Science instruction may not include subject matter that is not scientific fact.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Sookiechacha
How does it feel to be oil and water in the same glass ? 😁
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
Congratulationsfor being an exemplary representation of the danger and ignorance of teaching myth as fact and ignoring the science that disputes it. And thanks for supporting the new right-wing inquisition, making religious ignorance and bigotry great again!