You Either Keep Getting Your Booster Shots Or Admit You Were Wrong

a reply to: Itisnowagain

They better hurry up then.

Because here in the UK, the booster shots are not on offer any longer, or that's soon to be the case.

Aside from to those deemed susceptible, or at risk, aka the elderly and those that are immunocompromised.

Pretty much the same to similar as the flu shots issued each year to the same group of people.

a reply to: andy06shake

Mantiss2021 and Mrs Sparkles might not live in the UK.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

True but it's us that are conversing right now and not Mantiss2021 or Mrs Sparkles, and we both hail from the UK.

The colour of our day is exactly how i presented it.

The NHS are not handing out vaccines anymore aside from to those they deem at risk.

And thats just the fact of the matter.

a reply to: andy06shake

They better hurry up then.

There's no need to hurry to get every shot they are offered.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Well here in the UK they are not on offer any longer to everyone, or that is about to be the case.

Told you that 3 times now without it appearing to sink in. LoL

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Then it seems to me you freely pick and choose where vaccines are concerned.

Choice after all is a good thing.

Now where junkies are concerned well those are people with a compulsive habit or obsessive dependency on something.

"vaccine junkies" as you put it, would be hitting up mRNA vaccines 4 times a day or thereabouts.

Where are the people doing that?

Medications should be used where applicable far as i can establish.

It's clear from what I have said above that every vaccine or medication should be judged on its own merits and informed consent is vital.

As I said above

Not for SARS-CoV-2, I haven't been vaccinated, as I am not naive or stupid or ignorant. And certainly I am not a vaccine junkie and in general I use medications only when they are absolutely necessary.

As I said everything that was propagated by the establishment turned out to be wrong. From the origin of the virus, to herd immunity, to natural immunity, to asymptomatic spread, to fatality rates, to the safety and effectiveness of these products. And so many others.

The establishment tried to create an ideology out of the vaccines. But the vaccine ideology is a legitimate as the transgender ideology.

Forgot to mention that I have been infected very early in the pandemic and was asymptomatic. Hence my adventures with SARS-CoV-2 started and ended back in April 2020. We all know, or at least those who are not naive and have some basic education (I have more than that by the way), that natural immunity is by far superior to vaccinations and once you have dealt successfully with the primary infection then the shoe is over for the virus and the new variants.

Those who have been infected and developed natural immunity don't need a shot, a second shot, third, fourth, fifth, and so on.

a reply to: andy06shake

The UK is no longer offering the mRNA products to anyone under the age of 50.

In the UK they are trying to exonerate those responsible for the mess by not offering the mRNA products to anyone under the age of 50. In terms of benefit to risk ratio this is the correct decision but it has come late and it doesn't save the game.

The irony is that in the UK they were planning to vaccinate only those over the age of 50 back in the end of 2020 until mysterious forces hijacked science and medicine.

By the way. Your writing style reminds me of someone else here.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

It's clear from what I have said above that every vaccine or medication should be judged on its own merits and informed consent is vital.

Again choice is a fine thing indeed, and the vaccines are a choice.

At least where i hail from that has always been the case.

Nobody forcing you to do anything you do not want to.

Those who have been infected and developed natural immunity don't need a shot, a second shot, third, fourth, fifth, and so on.

I'm apt to place my faith in professional medically trained personnel as opposed to the advice you offer Asmodeus3.

Like i suggest all the same here in the UK there is no fifth shot on offer aside from to those deemed to require such aka the elderly and immunocompromised.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

The UK is no longer offering the mRNA products to anyone under the age of 50.

Indeed.

In the UK they are trying to exonerate those responsible for the mess by not offering the mRNA products to anyone under the age of 50. In terms of benefit to risk ratio this is the correct decision but it has come late and it doesn't save the game.

Bulls@it and anti-vax nonsense.

The irony is that in the UK they were planning to vaccinate only those over the age of 50 back in the end of 2020 until mysterious forces hijacked science and medicine.

And which "mysterious forces" would that be?

By the way. Your writing style reminds me of someone else here.

Amazeballs, and who would that be pray tell?

Because mods can spot duplicate accounts without breaking a sweat as you would realise if you had been here for any length of time.

They get banned on the spot and are not welcomed back.

a reply to: andy06shake

This will be true here soon enough Andy.

Then they will complain about being denied access. I would wager something on it, but I already know it will happen.

a reply to: andy06shake

You won't get a straight answer, just vague allusion to nebulous "maybe risks" and "possible problems"

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: andy06shake

Then they will complain about being denied access. .

Who will?

Who is this 'they'?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Anti-vaxxxers that have nothing but feelings-based rebutals. Once they are told they are not permitted to get the shots, they will throw a fit. I'd bet anything on it.

Some have already admitted their motivations are political. So we know these aren't decisions being made by rational actors.

a reply to: JBurns

Have you listened to the Bret Weinstein interview with Dr Aseem Malhotra?
It's 2 hours long and on YouTube.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Considering it's a 2 hour-long piece, I'm thinking a summary might be in order.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

I haven't, but I assure you I will give an open minded listen.

Is this the one? www.youtube.com...

a reply to: andy06shake
Is Bret Weinstein someone you would listen to and trust?

originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Itisnowagain

I haven't, but I assure you I will give an open minded listen.

Is this the one? www.youtube.com...

I think so.....when I click the link it is covered in a sign in pop up.

Skip to the 17 minute mark after Dr Malhotra speaks about his fathers passing....to miss out on sponsor stuff.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

I don't trust anyone Itisnowagain.

Trust is simply giving a person a finite amount of time to let you down.

The thing is without a modicum of such it's kind of hard to get by, or get anything done, in this world.

If you are apt to punt 2 hour podcast by way of evidence to support your claims, then you should be able to summarise the relevant information you have assimilated.

That is of course provided you have listened to the podcast yourself.

a reply to: andy06shake

It's so amazing that I have watched it more than once.