FDA pulls authorization for AstraZeneca’s Covid antibody drug Evusheld

a reply to: ScepticScot

vaers.hhs.gov...

coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk...

a reply to: Grenade

VAERS Data Should Be Interpreted with Caution
• VAERS data are from a passive surveillance system and represent unverified reports of health events
that occur after vaccination. Such data are subject to limitations of under-reporting, simultaneous
administration of multiple vaccine antigens, reporting bias, and lack of incidence rates in
unvaccinated comparison groups.
• When reporting and evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no
cause and effect relationship has been established. The event may have been related to an underlying
disease or condition, to medications being taken concurrently, or may have occurred by chance.
• A report often involves more than one vaccine and may involve more than one reported adverse event.
• In certain cases, VAERS requests additional information from reporters, healthcare providers and
other parties.
• When multiple reports of a single case or event are received, only the first report received is included
in the publicly accessible dataset. Subsequent reports may contain additional or conflicting data, and
there is no assurance that the data provided in the public dataset is the most accurate or current
available.
• A given report may meet more than one criterion for classification as “serious.”
• Accumulations of events reported to a passive surveillance system do not allow incidence rate
calculations due to the generally unknown extent of under-reporting as well as lack of information
on the number of people being vaccinated.

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: tanstaafl
Didn't read the post I answered did you.

Yeppers, I did, too bad your logic is awol (and has been for a long time as far as I can tell)...

And yes with holding potentially life saving medical treatment is a form of child abuse.

a) Vaccines are not medical treatments, they are at best potentially preventative measures, measures that have real. demonstrable risks attached to them.

In my opinion, anyone who jabs newborn babies (or even young children) with unnecessary toxic chemicals is the one engaging in child abuse.

a reply to: Grenade

Also

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS even if they are not sure if the vaccine was the cause. In some situations, reporting to VAERS is required of healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers.

VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

a reply to: ScepticScot

As i said, everything and anything but the vaccines.

a reply to: tanstaafl

Yes your opinion.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: ScepticScot

As i said, everything and anything but the vaccines.

I'm quoting the source you gave.

a reply to: ScepticScot


Given your assertions that these products are safe and effective.

What are the short, medium, and long term effects of these vaccines? The benefit to risk ratio for all age groups?

Do you know them? I will be surprised if you do know the medium and long term effects, unless you have a time machine. What studies show the medium and long terms effects??

You cannot assert what you want if you don't have the facts.

What are they? I suppose you do have a time machine...

a reply to: ScepticScot

What are the short, medium, and long term effects of these products. Do you know them? As you have called them safe and effective.

How can you establish safety and effectiveness if you don't know them or you don't know the benefit to risk ratio for all age groups?

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Grenade

Also

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS even if they are not sure if the vaccine was the cause. In some situations, reporting to VAERS is required of healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers.

VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Grenade

Also

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS even if they are not sure if the vaccine was the cause. In some situations, reporting to VAERS is required of healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers.

VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics.

Sorry that you find alternative opinions so hard to process.

Maybe you need a safe place

Possibly this site, or the internet in general, isn't for you.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Imagine you are trying to give 'lectures' on safety and effectiveness when you don't know the short, medium and long term effects or the benefit to risk ratio for all age groups. At the same time by your own admission you have no knowledge of the matters involved trying to dismiss the serious adverse reactions and deaths by peddling the official narrative of 'safe and effective' and of 'rare' events.

a reply to: Asmodeus3


What qualifications or evidence do have for arguing they are dangerous.

a reply to: ScepticScot

If only we had the raw data available from the RCTs. If only the placebo group had remained unvaccinated.

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3


What qualifications or evidence do have for arguing they are dangerous.

First of all the burned of proof is to those who claim they are safe and effective. So it's all yours by the way.

What are the short, medium, and long term effects of these products. Do you know them? As you have called them safe and effective.

How can you establish safety and effectiveness if you don't know them or you don't know the benefit to risk ratio for all age groups.

I wonder.

In terms of the harms I have recorded plenty in my threads. Deaths caused by vaccines and serious adverse reactions. So they could be potentially dangerous.

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Grenade

Also

VAERS accepts reports of adverse events that occur following vaccination. Anyone, including Healthcare providers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public can submit reports to the system. While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. Vaccine providers are encouraged to report any clinically significant health problem following vaccination to VAERS even if they are not sure if the vaccine was the cause. In some situations, reporting to VAERS is required of healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers.

VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

Stop engaging in vaccine apologetics.

Sorry that you find alternative opinions so hard to process.

Maybe you need a safe place

Possibly this site, or the internet in general, isn't for you.

I am impressed! Me? You have been claiming that this is conspiracy site. So myself and other fellow 'conspiracy' theorists are thriving around here.

The question is then returned to you.

And most importantly

What are the short, medium, and long term effects of these products. Do you know them? As you have called them safe and effective.

How can you establish safety and effectiveness if you don't know them or you don't know the benefit to risk ratio for all age groups.

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: ScepticScot

If only we had the raw data available from the RCTs. If only the placebo group had remained unvaccinated.

You don't need them. All you need is faith in the 'science'

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3


What qualifications or evidence do have for arguing they are dangerous.

First of all the burned of proof is to those who claim they are safe and effective. So it's all yours by the way.

What are the short, medium, and long term effects of these products. Do you know them? As you have called them safe and effective.

How can you establish safety and effectiveness if you don't know them or you don't know the benefit to risk ratio for all age groups.

I wonder.

In terms of the harms I have recorded plenty in my threads. Deaths caused by vaccines and serious adverse reactions. So they could be potentially dangerous.

There is plenty evidence for both safety and effectiveness.

It's possibly the most researched vaccine in history.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

You are the one who keeps telling people to stop posting opinions different from yours.

On a discussion forum...

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: Asmodeus3


What qualifications or evidence do have for arguing they are dangerous.

First of all the burned of proof is to those who claim they are safe and effective. So it's all yours by the way.

What are the short, medium, and long term effects of these products. Do you know them? As you have called them safe and effective.

How can you establish safety and effectiveness if you don't know them or you don't know the benefit to risk ratio for all age groups.

I wonder.

In terms of the harms I have recorded plenty in my threads. Deaths caused by vaccines and serious adverse reactions. So they could be potentially dangerous.

There is plenty evidence for both safety and effectiveness.

It's possibly the most researched vaccine in history.

Wrong .

Its the most Massive FDA Drug trial in the history of humanity , that is that we know of.

But prior to it's emergency release the vaccine was the most under researched Vaccine in history.