Confidential Pfizer and Government Documents Confirm ADE, Led to Millions Dying Suddenly

It seems we are starting to see outbreaks of very common pathogens, like Strep A. As with AIDS, people tend to die from weakened immune systems that can't fight off viruses or bacteria which are normally not a threat. In previous threads we warned about this VAIDs phenomena and now we are seeing it first hand. The Covid vaccine destroys natural immunity. When your immune system is constantly working to create antibodies for an extinct virus, the damage is multifactorial. First of all, your immune system is desperately using up it's resources to produce antibodies that have almost no effect against the latest variant. This leaves your defenses weakened against almost anything else. Secondly the spike proteins that are created are constantly causing inflammation and tissue damage. Not only is your immune system weakened, your body is attacking itself. It's basically like constantly carpet bombing your immune system and then inviting the enemy in to do even more damage.

One of the documents contained in the latest data dump is ‘reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf’, found on page 11 of the document shows an ‘Important Potential Risk’, and that risk is listed as ‘Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Reporatory Disease (VAERD)’.

The occurrence of these adverse events has had devastating consequences for the individuals who develop them and confidential and official documents prove that ADE and VAED have occurred due to COVID-19 vaccines, leading to a new form of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome and millions of excess deaths around the world.

ADE or VAED can also lead to increased excess deaths, which are deaths that occur above and beyond the expected number of deaths in a population.

This is because ADE and VAED may cause more severe illness and an increased risk of death, leading to a higher number of deaths than would be expected in a population that has not been exposed to the vaccine.

This may explain why, tragically, official Government records confirm that millions of people have mysteriously died suddenly in countries around the globe in the wake of the widespread distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Official reports published by the Governments of the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the UK & most of Europe, confirm 1.8 million excess deaths have been recorded since the mass roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.

SOURCE

www.science.org...


Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine

The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study.

The study demonstrates the power of the human immune system. The research impresses Nussenzweig and other scientists who have reviewed a preprint of the results, posted yesterday on medRxiv. “It’s a textbook example of how natural immunity is really better than vaccination,” says Charlotte Thålin, a physician and immunology researcher at Danderyd Hospital and the Karolinska Institute who studies the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. “To my knowledge, it’s the first time [this] has really been shown in the context of COVID

The power of natural immunity is unquestionable.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Well, it's hard to compete with evolving within an ecosystem rife with microbial lifeforms.

All of this to secure obscene patent profits... sad, sad, sad.

originally posted by: Maxmars
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Well, it's hard to compete with evolving within an ecosystem rife with microbial lifeforms.

All of this to secure obscene patent profits... sad, sad, sad.

We are talking trillions over the course of a decade.

How odd that the document linked in that article seems to have a paragraph that was left/edited out of the image used in the article.

originally posted by: daskakik
How odd that the document linked in that article seems to have a paragraph that was left/edited out of the image used in the article.

That says it's theoretical. Now we see Strep A outbreaks. So why did they try so hard to not release these documents? 75 years?

If only people cared so much about that fact. Always give the benefit of the doubt to the most corrupt company within the most corrupt industry who paid the largest criminal fine in history for faking trial results and paying off doctors. Those guys are fine, but anyone who questions the truth should micromanaged down to the punctuation they use.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Nothing in the production of the vaccine makes sense from a health perspective. FOIA from Australia tends to suggest they are heading for some real problems. This one got a couple of equal signs so i can't just do the pop-up. But it's interesting on what is occurring and how easy it would be to get the manufacturing all wrong. www.youtube.com... with regards to very bad batches.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0
That is a lot more than punctuation but if you don't mind being lied to by those supposedly bringing you the truth, then you are all good.

originally posted by: daskakik
How odd that the document linked in that article seems to have a paragraph that was left/edited out of the image used in the article.

Do you have doubts?
Are you engaging again in vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality? Defending Pfizer again?
How can your even try to defend them when this is a company that has been convicted several times and paid billions of dollars in criminal fines.

I have also created a thread and paid tribute to them: Pfizer: Six scandals to remember.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
That is a lot more than punctuation but if you don't mind being lied to by those supposedly bringing you the truth, then you are all good.

No one is lying except for the gov and big pharma.

a reply to: daskakik

Who is lying now? Who is bringing the truth? Unlikely to be Pfizer when they have been repeatedly convicted and paid billions of dollars in criminal fines.

a reply to: Asmodeus3
You missed the point, as usual.

Questioning one group of liars (the authors of the article in the OP) isn't defending the other group of liars (Pfizer).

a reply to: Asmodeus3
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Obviously the people that published that article with an edited pic and then where dumb enough to link to the unedited original.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Asmodeus3
You missed the point, as usual.

Questioning one group of liars (the authors of the article in the OP) isn't defending the other group of liars (Pfizer).

One is for sure a groups of liars and convicted criminals (Pfizer). For the other one you need a bit of proof other than your opinion.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Asmodeus3
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Obviously the people that published that article and edited that pic and then where dumb enough to link to the unedited original.

I don't think whatever you posted makes any difference and there is no evidence it's not from a revised version.


Attempting to make a mountain out of a molehill or no hill. That's not even the entire article.

An attempt to derail the thread as usual.

a reply to: Asmodeus3
The proof is in the link to that PDF in the article.

Why are you bending over backwards trying to defend them?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Revised means edited.

Even if the authors didn't do the editing, they chose the image to spin things in the direction that appeases your bias confirmation.

ETA: It is at least lying by omission.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Asmodeus3
The proof is in the link to that PDF in the article.

Why are you bending over backwards trying to defend them?

There is no proof of what you are saying but the usual attempt to divert attention and derail the thread.

Defending Pfizer again and engaging in vaccine apologetics?

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Revised means edited.

Even if the authors didn't do the editing, they chose the image to spin things in the direction that appeases your bias confirmation.

ETA: It is at least lying by omission.

Your unsubstantiated opinion only.

a reply to: Asmodeus3
All you have to do is click the link and see for yourself.

There is nothing else I can say. See you around.