Family take legal action after son dies following Covid vaccine

www.fbcmb.co.uk...

18 May 2022

A 26-year-old Midlands man who was given the Astra Zeneca Covid vaccine died less than two weeks later after developing blood clots on the brain.

Automotive design graduate Jack Hurn received the first dose of the jab on May 29 2021 after he and his girlfriend were told there was none of the alternative Pfizer vaccine available at the Dudley vaccine centre.

Jack, who was originally from Devon but was living in Redditch, began suffering headaches within days and died on June 11 at Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital after doctors described him as having “catastrophic” blood clots on the brain.

Jack’s devastated family have instructed clinical negligence specialists at Midlands law firm FBC Manby Bowdler, after raising concerns about advice given at the vaccine clinic and the standard of care received in hospital once Jack fell ill.

An inquest was held at the end of May

www.standard.co.uk...

Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine

A week-long inquest at Birmingham Coroner’s Court was told a GP informed Mr Hurn the risk of blood clots on the brain for his age group was one in 250,000, when the latest NHS guidance estimated it to be one in 50,000.

The inquest heard the Coventry University automotive design graduate opted to go ahead with his first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine on May 29 2021, after being told the Revival Fires vaccination hub in Dudley had no stock of the Pfizer jab.

Another very sad story about a young person aged 26 who died as a result of the Astrazeneca vaccine after developing blood clots in his brain.

According to the advice at that time those under the age of 30 should avoid the Astrazeneca vaccine and instead opt for the other ones such as Pfizer's or Moderna's vaccines.

They admit directly that the Astrazeneca vaccine is potentially dangerous for young and healthy people and that's why the vaccine is no longer used in the UK. Instead the advice is to get vaccinated with the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines as they are 'safe and effective'. This is where the irony meter breaks...

In a few words the argument here which is presented in the press, and there are numerous papers that have covered the story, is that the young person died as a result of out-of-date advice. They didn't have anymore of the safe and effective Pfizer vaccine and they had to go with that Astrazeneca one.

They didn't have anymore of the safe and effective Pfizer vaccine and they had to go with that Astrazeneca one.

Nobody HAS to. You can walk out of a clinic for any reason provided your medical needs aren't life threatening.

So AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson's vaccines are not mRNA and AstraZeneca's adverse effects have been widely published and warnings have been put out to the public. I am sorry this family suffered such a tragic event but why did they choose AstraZeneca? My country suspended AstraZeneca use in March 2021 due to problems with this vax, that poor man opted for his first vax in May 2021. EDIT: Oh that was the only type of vax left, but he still could have said "no".

those under the age of 30 should avoid the Astrazeneca vaccine and instead opt for the other ones such as Pfizer's or Moderna's vaccines.

What a perfect example of the proverbial "lesser of two evils".

The dangers of this vaccine are widely known. They have been for a long time!

I will have to stand in for the vaccine supporters:
That is totally normal for a 26 y/o man to have blood clots in his brain and die.
It is just a huge coincidence that it happened just after he got the vaccine.

Sarc.

And as usual the press in the UK tried hard to argue these events are 'rare' when at the same time the Astrazeneca vaccine is no longer used in the UK. Anyone can understand the reasons.

Instead the advice is to get vaccinated with the much safer Pfizer or Moderna vaccines...

If the warnings about a vaccine are out there in the public realm and countries are discontinuing it's use, when does it become an individual's responsibility to inform themselves?

originally posted by: butcherguy
I will have to stand in for the vaccine supporters:
That is totally normal for a 26 y/o man to have blood clots in his brain and die.
It is just a huge coincidence that it happened just after he got the vaccine.

Sarc.

Actually there are those who claim it's just a coincidence in similar cases and especially when there is no conclusion yet by the coroner or medical examiner or no autopsy. It's what we call vaccine apologists in our days.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
www.fbcmb.co.uk...

18 May 2022

A 26-year-old Midlands man who was given the Astra Zeneca Covid vaccine died less than two weeks later after developing blood clots on the brain.

Darwin award is starting to come into mind with all the known side effects at this point. Maybe too soon to say that buuuuuut just sayin

The number of lawsuits coming will be breath taking. There isn't enough money in the world even with fractional reserve currency.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

They didn't have anymore of the safe and effective Pfizer vaccine and they had to go with that Astrazeneca one.

Nobody HAS to. You can walk out of a clinic for any reason provided your medical needs aren't life threatening.

I agree completely.
I find no reason why a young and healthy person will have to be injected with these unknown, untested, and potentially hazardous products, when their chances to get sick and die due to Covid are miniscule.

Off the top of my head the infection fatality rate of the 20-29 age group is 0.003% i.e 3 in 100,000 Infections. And if you have no comorbidities it's probably zero.

a reply to: butcherguy

No, it is "rare", not normal.

From the OPs quote:

"Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine".

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The number of lawsuits coming will be breath taking. There isn't enough money in the world even with fractional reserve currency.

There must be a serious discussion on what one of the Italian Members of the European Parliament said: The greatest medical scandal in history.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Seems like big Pharma rather took against the Astrazenecca version being offered at cost.

Hence the backlash, by big Pharma:


www.bmj.com...


"Financial media in the US “clearly didn’t like the idea of a low cost vaccine, undercutting the market,” Hill told the Financial Times.2 AstraZeneca’s vaccine won regulatory approval the world over, but not in the US."

Interesting?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: butcherguy

No, it is "rare", not normal.

From the OPs quote:

"Birmingham area coroner Emma Brown ruled that Jack Hurn’s death was caused by a rare complication of the AstraZeneca vaccine".

This is the narrative you are referring to. Everything seems to be 'rare' and 'unusual'. But it looks like it isn't so rare given the cases of vaccine injuries and deaths. If it was so rare then the Astrazeneca vaccine would not have been pulled out of the market.

It's time now to withdraw all other vaccines from the market just as Dr Malhotra said who is also from the UK. Actually he argued that the vaccination campaign must be paused given that the risks may outweigh the benefits of vaccination.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Seems like big Pharma rather took against the Astrazenecca version being offered at cost.

Hence the backlash, by big Pharma:


www.bmj.com...


"Financial media in the US “clearly didn’t like the idea of a low cost vaccine, undercutting the market,” Hill told the Financial Times.2 AstraZeneca’s vaccine won regulatory approval the world over, but not in the US."

Interesting?

I have read it and there could be some truth in it. But none of the vaccines should have been released in the general population in the first place. I think this is obvious by now.

Unless they can be used for the elderly and those with compromised immune systems.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

It is not my narrative. It's a quote from the Birmingham Coroner. From the source in this thread.

Has the AZ been pulled from the UK?

I didn't know that?

originally posted by: quintessentone
If the warnings about a vaccine are out there in the public realm and countries are discontinuing it's use, when does it become an individual's responsibility to inform themselves?

I don't think most of those who went to get vaccinated knew the risk to benefit ratio for all age groups and the side effects of each vaccine. Many of them were coerced, pressured, intimidated, and threaten with dismissal by their employers.

There is no informed consent in this case.

The campaign will do down in history as the greatest medical scandal.

Personally, I followed common sense and the basics in immunology. Having been infected and developed superior natural immunity early on the pandemic, I didn't even care about going to get vaccinated. It's irrational to get vaccinated after being infected. You will get an F in Biology if you write a test arguing this.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Asmodeus3

It is not my narrative. It's a quote from the Birmingham Coroner. From the source in this thread.

Has the AZ been pulled from the UK?

I didn't know that?

It's the official narrative. They always say the same and repeat how 'rare' these events are.

www.theguardian.com...

No plans for UK to order more supplies of AstraZeneca Covid vaccine

Many other countries have stopped the roll out. Clearly the vaccine is not safe and effective. Quietly but systematically it has been withdrawn from the market.

www.bbc.com...

AstraZeneca vaccine: Denmark stops rollout completely.

Denmark has ceased giving the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid vaccine amid concerns about rare cases of blood clots, the first European country to do so fully.

Keywords: Rare, success, vaccines, saving lives.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone
If the warnings about a vaccine are out there in the public realm and countries are discontinuing it's use, when does it become an individual's responsibility to inform themselves?

I don't think most of those who went to get vaccinated knew the risk to benefit ratio for all age groups and the side effects of each vaccine. Many of them were coerced, pressured, intimidated, and threaten with dismissal by their employers.

There is no informed consent in this case.

The campaign will do down in history as the greatest medical scandal.

Personally, I followed common sense and the basics in immunology. Having been infected and developed superior natural immunity early on the pandemic, I didn't even care about going to get vaccinated. It's irrational to get vaccinated after being infected. You will get an F in Biology if you write a test arguing this.

Would that not have been constructive dismissal? Which means the company would have had to pay up, big time (with the right lawyer, of course). People had options, isn't it their responsibility to find out for themselves?

The medical professionals claimed from the get go, from all the studies (before the vax was released) that within their cohorts the side effects were 'rare' - we all had access to the information and data. The medical professionals are still claiming most side effects are 'rare' from new and ongoing studies.

It's confusing here on ATS because sources are cherry picked for mRNA vax being the culprit, then now the non-mRNA being the culprit as well.

Is there one vax/viral database where we can find the truth?