originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: Maxmars
WHO is totally corrupted , untrustworthy , dishonest piece of ...
...
That commie WHO director-general has been put to that position by others who know he will do anything ordered.
I'm not really arguing with you here, but I think we should take a moment to recognize something...
You and I both have made characterizations of these organizations, and even more. I think it's for the sake of expedience mostly, because we're
trying to make a point about the impact they have on the world they generally don't participate in.
But the truth is, it's not really the WHO, or even the UN that 'in principle' that actually fails us here. It is the cabals of power and influence
that are allowed to decide exactly which person gets into place there.
All of these "important" super citizens are "appointed" by others. We could speculate that they were appointed to promote and support one agenda or
other; perhaps not to "resist" ongoing plans and policies set in motion by others. Our guesses about why they are there can only be informed by what
they do. But the fact that the WHO exists in itself is not the problem. It's the people who act in its name.
Its similar to the hatred American people face for the foreign policy decisions they never actually make. Non-Americans attribute their displeasure
to the US population regardless of who actually gave offense... People blame the US for wars, corporate abuses, exported social degeneracy, and so
much more; but most of these 'sins' were never "ours" to share.,, just the blame.
If we examine the WHO paying attention to who actually authors policies historically ... we will find that it wasn't always as it is now. By blaming
he WHO as an 'entity' we are falling for the corporate facade, the idea that the individuals involved take no direct responsibility for what they have
done, and what are doing.
Let's not do what "they" do. Let's not pretend that someone didn't "decide" to vilify all things against their agenda as conspiracy theorist,
anti-vaxx, anti-social, evil, unvirtuous, and unscientific. That's their bailiwick. They operate in group identities, they cast aspersions (as
exemplified in the OP) with great ease and the magnification of importance. They are clearly on a path to declare any and all of this dissent as
"violence." At best this strategy belongs to a group represented with in the WHO, at worst a single person. In either case the WHO (the
organization itself) is only the jackal's clothing, not the jackal itself.