Denmark somthing horible is going on.

a reply to: incoserv

Yes business is way up and is getting better for funeral homes but like you say life insurance companies are taking a hammering.A massive problem is forming. www.bitchute.com... These are bottom-line figures.

a reply to: Dalamax

Why do people think that the ruling classes are these super clever people, with complex plans.

Just look at history on why have the ruling classes failed before. They have gotten too comfortable and drowned in their self-flattery and admiration. They have isolated themselves from the world and surrounded themselves with yes-men who praise their every word. Losing the healthy ability for self-criticism also loses the ability to evolve by realizing your mistakes and learning for them.
This has been the pattern throughout history, when dynasties or empires have fallen because hereditary power will weaken after every new and weaker generation.

I bet that they are even happy about the conspiracy theories, describing them as these super smart elites, with complex plans, alien connections etc.
As long as people see them like this, then no one will have the guts to stand up against them.

Agreed.

Surprisingly glorifying chefs and athletes is also a common theme if four horsemen is correct.



a reply to: eitea

SPAM

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: putnam6
a reply to: anonentity

You missed a golden opportunity to title the thread Something is rotten in Denmark.

Is there a place where we can look at the stats independent of Bitchute?

Deaths - Statistics Denmark

I'd guess that the official statistics haven't come in for 2022, yet, but clearly the number of deaths have been rising since before the pandemic and the COVID-19 vaccines.

Although, there is some indication that the excess deaths at the peak of the pandemic are now reducing:

Mortality is declining in Denmark - Statens Serum Institut

You are clearly in a denial if you imply that the fatality rate would have risen anyway in the young and healthy populations because it seems it was much higher even before the pandemic. There is no evidence for it.

If you don't want to be in the state of denial then ask yourself what is different between now and then.

1) Lockdowns
2) Lack of good primary care in some countries
3) Wrong response to the pandemic
4) Vaccines

Clearly 1) and 4) could affect the young and healthy populations quite a lot. The other two are also playing a good role.

I recall that on another thread you were claiming SARS-CoV-2 existed for a long period of time before it became pathogenic and it was with us for several years...But there is no evidence that natural selection happened after zoonosis.

Now you seem to claim that there were some sort of stealth health issues in the population prior to the pandemic.

These are self-defeating claims that have no basis on anything.

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: chr0naut
Well, just about any site would be more reliable than **BITCHUTE**, where there's no motivation or control to prevent the most outrageous of lies from gathering all the attention.

You call it "control to prevent the most outrageous of lies." I call it censorship .

Maybe you are to weak-minded to sift through the bovine feces and work out the facts. If that's the case, I suggest that you log out from the internet and find another source of entertainment.

For myself, I neither need nor want somebody else deciding what is "safe" for me to read, hear or watch. I am intelligent enough to decide for myself.

Your reply is effectively a call for others to censor what you can be exposed to, giving them the power to shape your thoughts. Do you really want that?

This is a much safe piece of work for you to read but it won't propagate in the mainstream where the control of the flow of information for the benefit of the 'good of humanity' happens...


www.medrxiv.org...


Setting: Japan

Participants Vaccinated population was 99 834 543 individuals aged 12 years and older who have been received SARS-CoV-2 vaccine once or twice by 14 February 2022. Reference population was defined persons aged 10 years and older from 2017 to 2019.


Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher risk of myocarditis death, not only in young adults but also in all age groups including the elderly. Considering healthy vaccinee effect, the risk may be 4 times or higher than the apparent risk of myocarditis death. Underreporting should also be considered. Based on this study, risk of myocarditis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may be more serious than that reported previously.


Further conclusions and policy implications

Despite above limitations, this study revealed that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was associated with higher mortality rate from myocarditis, especially in young adults compared with 2017 to 2019 population. But it also revealed that myocarditis death occurs in older persons. If healthy-vaccinee effect is taken into account, the risk increases at least approximately 4 times more than the unadjusted mortality risk. In addition, underreporting deaths after receiving vaccine should be considered. Based on the results of this study, it is necessary to inform public about that the risk of serious myocarditis including death may be far more serious than the risk reported before and that it occurs not only in young persons but also in elderly.

What is safe and what is not safe won't be dictated by politics and by individuals who have zero qualifications and/or zero knowledge and experience in scientific and medical matters. Nobody can decide in principle what others will decide to read, watch, listen to, etc.

a reply to: chr0naut

To call for a corporate or government entity to decide what is truth and what is acceptable for public exposure and consumption is to call for censorship. There's no way around that. In the public forum there will always be those who will deceive. Government and fascist corporate entities are at least as prone to that as anyone else - if not more so. It is the responsibility of the public to intelligently work through that. I reject calls for fascist organisms to determine for me what is truth. Again, I am not so weak-minded as to need Big Brother and its Ministry of Truth to sanitize my information.

And, no, entertainment is not my idea of truth and fact, but if you feel the need to have someone else parse the information that you receive for easy digestion instead of doing the hard work of parsing it yourself, then it is clear that for you it is more about being entertained and distracted than it is about learning, exercising your own mental faculties and being genuinely informed. That is a mark of an enslaved populace with a slave mentality.
:

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
... What is safe and what is not safe won't be dictated by politics and by individuals who have zero qualifications and/or zero knowledge and experience in scientific and medical matters. Nobody can decide in principle what others will decide to read, watch, listen to, etc.

The problem that we face is when a critical mass of the population take the attitude of our associate chr0naut and beg for those individuals who have zero qualifications and/or zero knowledge and experience in scientific and medical matters to define for them what is true and what is not. The combination of laziness and fear that induces that slave mentality is a frighteningly powerful drug and unfortunately many have become addicted to it.

ETA: An example of this would be the recently enacted California law that penalizes medical doctors for not following the narrative established by politicians with no medical knowledge. That is what the kind of censorship that these people call for and are ultimately willing to live under.

Again, I reject it!
:

They don’t want there to be enough fighting aged males to be able to rise up.

originally posted by: Xtrozero


You would normally think they would cull the old, sick and weak. The young and strong are your work force.

The old, sick and weak, They are in charge!

originally posted by: mikell
originally posted by: Xtrozero


You would normally think they would cull the old, sick and weak. The young and strong are your work force.

The old, sick and weak, They are in charge!

As someone else has pointed out, their vision for the future is all about automation and artificial intelligence. Look at the self-checkout systems in stores and computer kiosk order systems in fast food restaurants. They want driverless trucking and a driverless shared public transportation system run by AI under complete monitoring and control. There are machines that make pizzas and hamburgers and don't demand hourly wages, don't fail to show up for work.

These all mean less jobs for the working class while the working class would continue to grow and need more jobs. It means less jobs for the "plebes" and the "useless eaters." The only way to resolve the looming crisis of lack of gainful employment is to eliminate as many as possible of the the potentially unemployed.
:

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
... What is safe and what is not safe won't be dictated by politics and by individuals who have zero qualifications and/or zero knowledge and experience in scientific and medical matters. Nobody can decide in principle what others will decide to read, watch, listen to, etc.

The problem that we face is when a critical mass of the population take the attitude of our associate chr0naut and beg for those individuals who have zero qualifications and/or zero knowledge and experience in scientific and medical matters to define for them what is true and what is not. The combination of laziness and fear that induces that slave mentality is a frighteningly powerful drug and unfortunately many have become addicted to it.

ETA: An example of this would be the recently enacted California law that penalizes medical doctors for not following the narrative established by politicians with no medical knowledge. That is what the kind of censorship that these people call for and are ultimately willing to live under.

Again, I reject it!
:

Precisely!

Doctors and physicians should outright reject such laws and must not follow them. No doctor or scientist should ever follow a political narrative.

We also reject the notion of unqualified individuals dictating what is safe to read, watch, and listen to. When I say unqualified I mean people who have no relevance with the subject but trying to enforce their ideologies either off line or online.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Even "qualified" people have no place and no right to tell me what information I can ingest. They are welcome to present a counterargument to any piece of information published and I have the right, the mental capacity, and the will to parse, analyze and decide for myself what to think.

Minitru is not for me!

a reply to: Xtrozero

It’s not necessary to be selective. Indiscriminate culling on a large enough scale will collapse the systems the sick and weak rely on to survive. There will still be enough healthy stock to keep the new trimmed machine running. Any stock that wants to fight will be easier to find and pick out. Fish in a barrel.

originally posted by: incoserv
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Even "qualified" people have no place and no right to tell me what information I can ingest. They are welcome to present a counterargument to any piece of information published and I have the right, the mental capacity, and the will to parse, analyze and decide for myself what to think.

Minitru is not for me!

Agreed.

They can make recommendations which is absolutely fine but imposing their authority and views on others is absolutely unacceptable.

Since you mentioned it, there are those who believe that nobody, apart from the select-few, has the mental capacity and intelligence to take decisions for themselves.

originally posted by: KleenX
a reply to: Xtrozero

It’s not necessary to be selective. Indiscriminate culling on a large enough scale

All straight from the Thanos playbook.

a reply to: teapot

Never seen those movies. But it’s common sense. You just need to break a few systems; “pull the lynch pin”, as it were. I’m just playing the mental exercise game here. I’m just a useless eater so I know nothing.

a reply to: anonentity

The data is coming in fast.

It's happening world-wide I would think.



Good stuff anon, keep at it, it can't be ignored forever.

originally posted by: Antisocialist

Generally speaking, the old, sick and weak aren't the portion of the population that contribute to procreation and future population growth.

You bring up an important issue that no one here is thinking about. We do not need the evil reptilians to reduce our population. We are doing fine all by ourselves. Woman are not having their 2.1 kids per anymore and in most places outside of Africa and some 3rd world counties there has been a population decline for decades. In 50 years China is estimated to be at 600k with a massive old population, not good. The only increase in America and EU for decades has been immigration. Musk just recently said it is the biggest threat to mankind, so there is no need to force depopulation at all. In fact I can see China in 50 years forcing woman to have kids, and then the kids head off to a Goverment facility to live. It will not be a abortion rights issue anymore, it will be not be force women to have kids right that Governments will either force on the population or give such good incentives that woman will not pass it up.

Depopulation?


www.worldometers.info...

The data is indeed coming in fast.

So much for Depopulation?