It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I don't think i am trying to decide your opinions. I just say that your opinion is motivated by political ideologies.
And your opinion isn't?!?!
Being right wing isn't a crime generally speaking. Being against a specific vaccine isn't a crime either.
I agree, but blindly following said ideology is also unhealthy.
The Gateway Pundit have unashamedly used this for propaganda purposes before any autopsy results have been published and is jumping the gun because of bias and is purely Doom Porn.
Death from any vaccine is always a very slim but real possabilty.
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: Overseeall
her irrational beliefs
Prove she is irrational .
Bet you can't
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I don't think i am trying to decide your opinions. I just say that your opinion is motivated by political ideologies.
And your opinion isn't?!?!
Being right wing isn't a crime generally speaking. Being against a specific vaccine isn't a crime either.
I agree, but blindly following said ideology is also unhealthy.
The Gateway Pundit have unashamedly used this for propaganda purposes before any autopsy results have been published and is jumping the gun because of bias and is purely Doom Porn.
Death from any vaccine is always a very slim but real possabilty.
No, my opinions are not motivated by politics but knowledge.
Yes, if one follows an ideology to argue about vaccines, for example the vaccine ideology that cannot be right.
I don't think the mother of this person who died is motivated ideologically.
originally posted by: Kurokage
originally posted by: Asmodeus3
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
I don't think i am trying to decide your opinions. I just say that your opinion is motivated by political ideologies.
And your opinion isn't?!?!
Being right wing isn't a crime generally speaking. Being against a specific vaccine isn't a crime either.
I agree, but blindly following said ideology is also unhealthy.
The Gateway Pundit have unashamedly used this for propaganda purposes before any autopsy results have been published and is jumping the gun because of bias and is purely Doom Porn.
Death from any vaccine is always a very slim but real possabilty.
No, my opinions are not motivated by politics but knowledge.
Yes, if one follows an ideology to argue about vaccines, for example the vaccine ideology that cannot be right.
I don't think the mother of this person who died is motivated ideologically.
Your opinions are that, just your opinions, nothing more.
The anti-vax ideologists are the ones pushing the death of a young woman for propaganda purposes and with 12.87 billion doses already administered, and 2.03 million more a day, the death rate claims by anti-vax groups would be far more noticable than the claims made.
originally posted by: kittywrangler
a reply to: Overseeall
i find it laughably ignorant when another adult wants to act like they know a child better than their parent(s). a parent being with a child throughout their development certainly qualifies a parent's opinion.
There are qualified and unqualified opinions.
Mine are qualified.
originally posted by: KurokageThere's more biased unqualified propaganda against the vaccine than for it and like I've stated its now more than 12.87 billion people vaxed and the dead aren't laying every where like some posters have commented, I mean it should be 40% of the UK dead by now.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Seriously?!!!!
The latest UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) COVID-19 variant technical briefing, published today, includes updated epidemiological analysis which indicates that Omicron BA.5 has, as expected, become the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in the UK.
An estimated 78.7% of confirmed cases in England are BA.5 which was first identified in April and was designated as a Variant of Concern on 18 May.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3
You really do like to make it personal and you shouldn't if you really are an adult here on ATS.
There are qualified and unqualified opinions.
Mine are qualified.
Thats your claim and nothing more my friend.
And unless you're willing to show the mods your supposed qualifications then anyone elses opinion is just as valid as yours.
There's more biased unqualified propaganda against the vaccine than for it and like I've stated its now more than 12.87 billion people vaxed and the dead aren't laying every where like some posters have commented, I mean it should be 40% of the UK dead by now.
Until the results of the girls autopsy are revealed then it's just anti-vaxers pushing more Doom Porn.
originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: igloo
It is a complex situation and subject, but the amount of Doom Porn propaganda isn't matching the statistics. There is no disputing that 12.87 billion people have been vaccinated and if it was as fatal as some suggest, we'd be seeing dead every where and not just stories of "my Brothers, Uncles, sons best mates Dad died from the vax"
All vaccines have side effects and some are worse than others.
If you take in consideration 12.8 billion people have been vaccinated, then if even 0.01% died from the side effects of the jab, that would still equate to 1,300,000 people and sadly some people have died from it.
originally posted by: baggy7981
Why was a healthy 17-18 year old propagandised/manipulated into taking clot shots?
Factor in pfizer trying to hide their trial data for decades,
originally posted by: Overseeall
originally posted by: kittywrangler
a reply to: Overseeall
i find it laughably ignorant when another adult wants to act like they know a child better than their parent(s). a parent being with a child throughout their development certainly qualifies a parent's opinion.
A parents opinion does not overrule medical diagnostics. Or is that not right?
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: Hecate666
We did, we said that it wasn't credible to count people as having died from covid purely because they had it prior to death.
We said that this was distorting the figures and made reliable data much more difficult to find.
We kick up such a storm about it that many state and national governments were forced to change their reporting methodology.
We successfully lobbied to change the system.
And you... Posted about people glowing in the dark?