CONFIRMED: As Gateway Pundit Reported — FBI Doctored Mar-a-Lago Photo

a reply to: Justoneman

The GSA packs and ships often using NGO contractors.

And like ballots that get "transported" to central count locations, the Trump shipments to MAL could have easily be tampered with for political reasons like we're seeing.

It was known well enough in advance that Trump was going, and they had plenty of time to infiltrate the mover teams.

The Biden Transition Teams were there too. ☠️

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude

Any document that may be attorney-client privileged has been separated. While it would be a little unorthodox to assign a special master (they're usually used in cases where a law firm has been searched and there's documents from multiple clients) nobody was really going to have a problem if one was assigned for attorney-client privilege.

The problem stems from the fact that she is also including a review of all documents for executive privilege based on no sound legal argument. To facilitate this review she is ordering the government to stop their review of the documents.

"Any document that may be attorney-client privileged has been separated"




Says democrats and fbi, who have less than zero credibility in this case after 7 years of fabricating evidence to get Trump.

That is the EXACT job a Special Master is usually appointed for, though it's usually dealing with attorney-client priv.

Sounds like you agreed with Trump all along, hope TDS doesn't explode your brain over that.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

What a special master does is reviews documents that could be attorney-client privileged and decides whether that is the case. They make no judgments beyond that.

So if a special master is appointed for executive privilege, all they're doing is determining what documents are executive privileged. As was established in Thompson v. Trump, which this idiot judge even cites in her decision, former Presidents do not have executive privilege.

So, what exactly do you think this special master will achieve other than delaying the case for months?

Number 1 is that someone other than crooked democrats and fbi gets to see what documents the government has, that REALLY scares them for some reason, which has folks suspecting (with good reason) that democrats and the fbi are fabricating evidence to get Trump again.

I don't know what will happen after that, because I don't know what the special master will find.

Evidently, they seized medical records in the raid. Why did they need that ?

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Read the warrant. Everything contained in a box that also contained classified documents was to be collected. The reason being that it has evidentiary value showing that the classified documents were not handled correctly.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Read the warrant. Everything contained in a box that also contained classified documents was to be collected. The reason being that it has evidentiary value showing that the classified documents were not handled correctly.

Banana Republics are laughing at us now, and rightfully so.

democrats must be so proud.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

For collecting evidence?

a reply to: vNex92

It makes sense to me. They took client-attorney privileged documents and with that they can smear him whether they charge him or not

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

For collecting evidence?

For thinking what happened had anything to do with 'collecting evidence'.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Read the warrant. Everything contained in a box that also contained classified documents was to be collected. The reason being that it has evidentiary value showing that the classified documents were not handled correctly.

Read the ruling.

The judge is convinced that Trump is likely to prevail on his claim of priviledge and threw out that ridiculous democrat claim that priviledge expires at term end.


Has msm informed everyone yet?

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

She can think whatever she wants. The Supreme Court already gave us a pretty good idea of how they'll vote on this matter in Thompson v. Trump.

Thomas and Kavanaugh will definitely side with Trump. Roberts will most likely side with the Liberal Justices. The wildcards will be Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, but only one of them will need to side with the Liberal Justices and all of them ruled against Trump in Thompson v. Trump.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
Evidently, they seized medical records in the raid. Why did they need that ?

Imagine what 30 loons can do in your house over a 9 hour period.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

She can think whatever she wants. The Supreme Court already gave us a pretty good idea of how they'll vote on this matter in Thompson v. Trump.

Thomas and Kavanaugh will definitely side with Trump. Roberts will most likely side with the Liberal Justices. The wildcards will be Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, but only one of them will need to side with the Liberal Justices and all of them ruled against Trump in Thompson v. Trump.

Will comrade O then have to return the fast & furious docs he claimed exec priv on?

What time is the panty raid?

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

A special master does credibility?

Its enough for me that Democrats are against having one. Very gratifying when they are upset, no matter what the reason.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

Judge Cannon is cut from the same cloth as Justice Thomas.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher

You keep confusing executive privilege and restricted access. A President can request that the Archivist not allow public access to certain Presidential records for up to 5 or 12 years depending on the document.

The request has to be made while they are still President and NARA still retains control of those documents.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

Judge Cannon is cut from the same cloth as Justice Thomas.

I honestly don't know much about her, but I just read several of her rulings in detail today and I can see a little resemblance to Thomas in those.

She takes no # from anyone and pushes straight to the actual legal question at hand with a strong disdain for games, grandstanding, or expanding precedent by redefinition.

I'm a fan.

democrats are likely to hater her for decades.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

You keep confusing executive privilege and restricted access. A President can request that the Archivist not allow public access to certain Presidential records for up to 5 or 12 years depending on the document.

The request has to be made while they are still President and NARA still retains control of those documents.

I'm confusing nothing, you are intentionally trying to make this about NARA, when Exec/Attorney Priv and/or declass had already been applied, making NARA completely irrelevant for the documents that democrats were so desperate for.

You did accurately parrot part of the Get Trump team's flimsy legal arguement with zero precedent though, one that Cannon directly rejected, along with their claim that Trump had tried to stall anything during their NARA games, which was a major part of the 'justification' used to get their illegal search warrant in the first place - which could have some pretty big consequences for certain dems & fbi.



Her ruling was absolutely devastating for democrats in many subtle ways that are almost certainly keeping the Get Trump team up all night right now.

No worries though, I'm sure they'll get him next time.

Think back. When you handled or looked at classified documents, what was the first thing you did? Take off the binder clip if it was multi-page or if a single page, the corner was stapled and the cover bent at the corner. Now look at the FBI photo. How many binder clips, clip marks, staple marks or folded corners do you see?...NONE, they look like new cover sheets.
I have worked alongside, generally not with, the FBI on numerous occasions. on the whole, on a one on one basis, the FBI agents and anaylsists were good folks. But get their burocracy involved and there was no trade, simply get, get, get.
At Fort Hood, periodically we'd show the FBI, at their 'request' our work load. They'd go through the files and if it was a slam- dunk, they'd claim the case right then. At the El Paso Intelligence Center, there was on who 'demanded' every come to her desk and report.
But their cafeteria at the academy was good.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: MidnightWatcher

She can think whatever she wants. The Supreme Court already gave us a pretty good idea of how they'll vote on this matter in Thompson v. Trump.

Thomas and Kavanaugh will definitely side with Trump. Roberts will most likely side with the Liberal Justices. The wildcards will be Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, but only one of them will need to side with the Liberal Justices and all of them ruled against Trump in Thompson v. Trump.

DOJ has to appeal it to the majority Trump 11th circuit first.